| Literature DB >> 26742960 |
Soriane de Souza-Cruz1,2, Marilú Barbieri Victória3,4, Andréa Monteiro Tarragô5,6, Allyson Guimarães da Costa7,8,9, João Paulo Diniz Pimentel10, Ericka Florêncio Pires11, Lorene de Paula Araújo12, Jordana Grazziela Coelho-dos-Reis13,14, Matheus de Souza Gomes15, Laurence Rodrigues Amaral16, Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho17,18, Olindo Assis Martins-Filho19,20, Flamir da Silva Victória21,22, Adriana Malheiro23,24.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study, we have evaluated the immunological status of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients aiming at identifying putative biomarkers associated with distinct degrees of liver fibrosis. Peripheral blood and tissue T-cells as well as cytokine levels were quantified by flow cytometry.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26742960 PMCID: PMC4705620 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-015-0610-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Study population
| Characteristics | Non-infected Controls ( | HCV Patients ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 40.3 ± 9.1 | 50 ± 8.9 | |
| Male/Female | 20/8 | 10/08 | |
| Liver Fibrosis Score | F1-2 | NA | 11 |
| F3-4 | NA | 7 | |
Fig. 1Virological and liver damage (ALT) assessment in HCV patients according to the fibrosis score. a HCV viral load and (b) serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were determined in serum HCV patients () categorized into subgroups referred as F1-2 () and F3-4 () and compared to uninfected controls (). The results are expressed as mean ± SE viral copies/mL and mean ± SE IU/L, respectively. Significant differences at P < 0.05 between HCV versus NI or F1-2 versus F3-4 are highlighted by connecting lines. Differences between HCV subgroups (F1-2 or F3-4) in comparison to NI are highlighted by “*”. NA = Non Applicable
Fig. 2Peripheral Blood Biomarkers in HCV patients according to the fibrosis score. a Frequency of circulating T-cell subsets (CD4+, CD8+, Treg and CD4+/CD8+ ratio) in HCV patients () categorized into subgroups referred as F1-2 () and F3-4 () as compared to uninfected controls (). b Levels of serum cytokines (IL-6, TNF, IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10 and IL-17). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation for the percentage of gated lymphocytes for circulating T-cell subsets or serum concentration (MFI) for cytokines. Statistical analyses were performed by the Mann–Whitney test for comparisons between groups. Significant differences at P < 0.05 between HCV versus NI or F1-2 versus F3-4 are represented by connecting lines. Differences between HCV subgroups (F1-2 or F3-4) in comparison to NI are highlighted by “*”
Fig. 3Hepatic Tissue Biomarkers in HCV patients according to the fibrosis score. a Frequency of intrahepatic T-cell subsets (CD4+, CD8+, Treg and CD4+/CD8+ ratio) in HCV patients () categorized into subgroups referred as F1-2 () and F3-4 (). b Levels of tissue cytokines (IL-6, TNF, IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10 and IL-17) secreted by mononuclear cells cultured in vitro for 12 h in RPMI (1x106cells/mL) at 37 °C, 5 % CO2. Data are expressed as scattering of individual percentage of intra-hepatic T-cell subsets within gated lymphocytes or tissue for cytokine concentration (MFI). The median values of each biomarker was calculated for the HCV group and used as a cut off to segregate subjects presenting high (continuous lined rectangle) or low (dashed lined rectangle) biomarker levels. The Chi-square test was used to compare the frequency of subjects presenting high or low biomarker levels between the HCV subgroups (F1-2 versus F3-4). The frequencies of subjects presenting high or low biomarker levels in the F1-2 versus F3-4 subgroups are provided in the figure. In all cases, significant differences at P < 0.05 were found between F1-2 versus F3-4
Fig. 4“Cytokine signatures” in HCV patients according to the fibrosis score. The ascendant frequency of subjects with “high” serum cytokine levels was assembled for (a) HCV patients () and uninfected controls () as well as (b) for the HCV patients categorized into subgroups referred as F1-2 () and F3-4 (). Relevant elements in the cytokine signature that emerge above the 50th percentile (cut-off line) were highlighted by *. Additional analyses were carried out to identify relevant elements in the cytokine signature able to differentiate clinical groups (HCV versus NI or F1-2 versus and F3-4) and the elements in the cytokine signature of each group that emerge above the 50th percentile were highlight by grayscale background rectangles
Fig. 5“Cytokine Networks” in HCV patients according to the fibrosis score. Customized biomarker network layouts were built to identify the relevant association between proinflammatory IL-6, TNF, IL-2 and IFN-γ cytokines (black circles), modulatory IL-10 axis (light gray circle) and additional IL-4 and IL-17 axes (dark gray circles), using a clustered distribution of nodes. Significant Spearmam’s correlations at P < 0.05 were represented by connecting edges to highlight positive [strong (r ≥ 0.68; thick continuous line) or moderate (0.36 ≥ r ≤ 0.67; thin continuous line)] and negative [strong (r ≤ −0.68; thick dashed line) or moderate (−0.36 ≥ r ≤ −0.67; thin dashed line)] as proposed by Taylor [18]. The overall statistic analysis of the network node neighborhood connections point out for an almost linear-chain pattern in the NI groups with a clear shift towards a more imbricate profile in HCV patients. A persistent IL17/IL-4 loop was observed in all HCV subgroups with differential neighborhood connections for the IL-10 node in HCV patients according to the fibrosis score
Fig. 6Computational bioinformatics analysis of serum cytokine levels in HCV patients according to the fibrosis score. Machine learning data mining was represented by heatmaps (a and b) and decision-trees (c and d) of z-score-normalized events. The heatmap computational method was applied to pre-process the serum cytokine data, in addition to identifying the attributes matching those across samples and clusters of individuals. a Serum cytokine attributes showed clear ability to cluster HCV patients, with up-regulated levels, apart from non-infected individuals, with basal levels of serum cytokines. b Heatmap analysis showed low performance to segregate the HCV patients according to their liver fibrosis scores. c Decision tree analysis provided the identification of “root” (TNF) and “secondary” (IL-10) attributes with high accuracy to categorize HCV patients aside from non-infected individuals. d Decision tree analysis showed moderate global performance of “root” (IFN-γ) and “secondary” (TNF) attributes to cluster HCV patients according to their liver fibrosis score