| Literature DB >> 33125400 |
Ednelza da Silva Graça Amoras1, Samara Tatielle Monteiro Gomes1, Maria Alice Freitas Queiroz1, Mauro Sergio Moura de Araújo1, Marialva Tereza Ferreira de Araújo2, Simone Regina Souza da Silva Conde2,3, Ricardo Ishak1, Antonio Carlos Rosário Vallinoto1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Liver fibrosis is a result of continuous damage to the liver combined with accumulation of the extracellular matrix and is characteristic of most chronic liver diseases such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33125400 PMCID: PMC7598451 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241199
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical, biochemical, and histopathological information on the study population.
| Variables | Chronic hepatitis C | Normal control |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects ( | 45 | 8 |
| Gender (F/M) (%) | 21/24 (46.7/53.3) | 4/4 (50.0/50.0) |
| Age (mean) | 47.8 | 39.8 |
| ALT (IU/L) Median | 79.0 | 27.5 |
| AST (IU/L) Median | 66.3 | 21.0 |
| GGT (IU/L) Median | 65.9 | 29.0 |
| Fibrosis Scores | ||
| F0 (%) | 6 (13.3) | 8 (100.0) |
| F1 (%) | 20 (44.4) | - |
| F2 (%) | 8 (17.8) | - |
| F3 (%) | 5 (11.2) | - |
| F4 (%) | 6 (13.3) | - |
| Level of Inflammation | ||
| A0 (%) | 6 (13.3) | 8 (100.0) |
| A1 (%) | 24 (53.3) | - |
| A2 (%) | 15 (33.4) | - |
ALT: Alanine aminotransferase (ref.: 14 to 55 IU/L); AST: Aspartate aminotransferase (ref.: 14 to 32 IU/L); GGT: Gamma-glutamyl transferase (ref.: < 50 IU/L)
aFibrosis scores: F0, absence of fibrosis; F1, portal fibrosis without septa; F2, portal fibrosis with rare septa; F3, numerous septa without cirrhosis; and F4, cirrhosis.
bInflammatory activity: A0, absent; A1, minimum; and A2, moderate.
Clinical, biochemical and histopathological data according to hepatic changes (METAVIR) in the study population.
| Variables | Liver fibrosis score—METAVIR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F0-F1 | F2 | F3-F4 | CT | |
| (n = 26) | (n = 8) | (n = 11) | (n = 8) | |
| Liver enzymes | ||||
| ALT (IU/L) Median | 67.0 | 122.3 | 85.3 | 27.0 |
| AST (IU/L) Median | 53.2 | 77.5 | 83.2 | 21.0 |
| GGT (IU/L) Median | 50.0 | 92.0 | 128.0 | 29.0 |
| Inflammatory activity | ||||
| A0 | 6 (26.00) | 0 | 0 | 8 (100) |
| A1 | 16 (61.60) | 2 (25.00) | 6 (54.50) | 0 |
| A2 | 4 (15.40) | 6 (75.00) | 5 (45.50) | 0 |
ALT: Alanine aminotransferase (ref.: 14 to 55 IU/L); AST: Aspartate aminotransferase (ref.: 14 to 32 IU/L); GGT: Gamma-glutamyl transferase (ref.: < 50 IU/L)
aFibrosis scores: F0, absence of fibrosis; F1, portal fibrosis without septa; F2, portal fibrosis with rare septa; F3, numerous septa without cirrhosis; and F4, cirrhosis.
bInflammatory activity: A0, absent; A1, minimum; and A2, moderate.
Fig 1IL10 mRNA and plasma IL-10 levels according to the clinical condition of the liver.
A-C: Intrahepatic IL10 expression between the HCV and control (CT) patients with different fibrosis scores and with different necroinflammatory activity levels (A: Mann-Whitney test; B and C: Kruskal-Wallis test). D-F: Plasma IL-10 concentrations between HCV and CT patients with different fibrosis scores and be with different necroinflammatory activity scores (D: Mann-Whitney test; E and F: Kruskal-Wallis test).
Fig 2HCV viral load according to the clinical condition of the liver.
A-B: Comparison of the median plasma viral load in chronic viral hepatitis patients with different fibrosis scores and with necroinflammatory activity scores (METAVIR) in the liver. Kruskal-Wallis test.
Fig 3Analysis of IL10 mRNA levels according to the clinical condition of the liver and viral load represented by heatmaps.
A-B: Intrahepatic IL10 expression showed a clear ability to cluster patients with low plasma ALT, AST and GGT concentrations and different METAVIR scores. C: Viral load was able to cluster patients with high plasma concentrations of liver enzymes, but intrahepatic IL10 expression was not able to cluster chronic liver disease patients with different liver fibrosis scores (METAVIR).
Fig 4Interaction networks between IL10 mRNA levels and the analyzed biomarkers.
Interaction networks between the analyzed biomarkers. Correlation values were categorized and are represented by connecting lines (edges). The r values were used to categorize strong positive correlations (r ≥ 0.68, dark solid), moderate positive correlations (0.36 ≤ r ≤ 0.67; light solid line) and negative correlations (-0.37 ≥ r; dashed line). Spearman's correlation analysis was used.
Fig 5TGFβ1 mRNA level according to the clinical condition of the liver and its correlation with the IL10 mRNA level.
A-C: Intrahepatic TGFβ1 expression between HCV and CT patients (Mann-Whitney test) and between patients with different fibrosis scores and with different necroinflammatory activity levels (Kruskal-Wallis test). D: Spearman's correlation analysis between TGFB1 and IL10 mRNA levels.