OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to devise a machine learning framework to assist care coordination programs in prognostic stratification to design and deliver personalized care plans and to allocate financial and medical resources effectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is based on a de-identified cohort of 2,521 hypertension patients from a chronic care coordination program at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Patients were modeled as vectors of features derived from electronic health records (EHRs) over a six-year period. We applied a stepwise regression to identify risk factors associated with a decrease in mean arterial pressure of at least 2 mmHg after program enrollment. The resulting features were subsequently validated via a logistic regression classifier. Finally, risk factors were applied to group the patients through model-based clustering. RESULTS: We identified a set of predictive features that consisted of a mix of demographic, medication, and diagnostic concepts. Logistic regression over these features yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.71 (95% CI: [0.67, 0.76]). Based on these features, four clinically meaningful groups are identified through clustering - two of which represented patients with more severe disease profiles, while the remaining represented patients with mild disease profiles. DISCUSSION: Patients with hypertension can exhibit significant variation in their blood pressure control status and responsiveness to therapy. Yet this work shows that a clustering analysis can generate more homogeneous patient groups, which may aid clinicians in designing and implementing customized care programs. CONCLUSION: The study shows that predictive modeling and clustering using EHR data can be beneficial for providing a systematic, generalized approach for care providers to tailor their management approach based upon patient-level factors.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to devise a machine learning framework to assist care coordination programs in prognostic stratification to design and deliver personalized care plans and to allocate financial and medical resources effectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is based on a de-identified cohort of 2,521 hypertensionpatients from a chronic care coordination program at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Patients were modeled as vectors of features derived from electronic health records (EHRs) over a six-year period. We applied a stepwise regression to identify risk factors associated with a decrease in mean arterial pressure of at least 2 mmHg after program enrollment. The resulting features were subsequently validated via a logistic regression classifier. Finally, risk factors were applied to group the patients through model-based clustering. RESULTS: We identified a set of predictive features that consisted of a mix of demographic, medication, and diagnostic concepts. Logistic regression over these features yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.71 (95% CI: [0.67, 0.76]). Based on these features, four clinically meaningful groups are identified through clustering - two of which represented patients with more severe disease profiles, while the remaining represented patients with mild disease profiles. DISCUSSION: Patients with hypertension can exhibit significant variation in their blood pressure control status and responsiveness to therapy. Yet this work shows that a clustering analysis can generate more homogeneous patient groups, which may aid clinicians in designing and implementing customized care programs. CONCLUSION: The study shows that predictive modeling and clustering using EHR data can be beneficial for providing a systematic, generalized approach for care providers to tailor their management approach based upon patient-level factors.
Authors: Jimeng Sun; Candace D McNaughton; Ping Zhang; Adam Perer; Aris Gkoulalas-Divanis; Joshua C Denny; Jacqueline Kirby; Thomas Lasko; Alexander Saip; Bradley A Malin Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Wayne J Katon; Elizabeth H B Lin; Michael Von Korff; Paul Ciechanowski; Evette J Ludman; Bessie Young; Do Peterson; Carolyn M Rutter; Mary McGregor; David McCulloch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-12-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kevin L Thomas; Bimal R Shah; Sharon Elliot-Bynum; Kristin D Thomas; Katrina Damon; Nancy M Allen LaPointe; Sarah Calhoun; Laine Thomas; Khadijah Breathett; Robin Mathews; Monique Anderson; Robert M Califf; Eric D Peterson Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2014-10-28
Authors: Joyce C Ho; Joydeep Ghosh; Steve R Steinhubl; Walter F Stewart; Joshua C Denny; Bradley A Malin; Jimeng Sun Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Joshua C Denny; Lisa Bastarache; Marylyn D Ritchie; Robert J Carroll; Raquel Zink; Jonathan D Mosley; Julie R Field; Jill M Pulley; Andrea H Ramirez; Erica Bowton; Melissa A Basford; David S Carrell; Peggy L Peissig; Abel N Kho; Jennifer A Pacheco; Luke V Rasmussen; David R Crosslin; Paul K Crane; Jyotishman Pathak; Suzette J Bielinski; Sarah A Pendergrass; Hua Xu; Lucia A Hindorff; Rongling Li; Teri A Manolio; Christopher G Chute; Rex L Chisholm; Eric B Larson; Gail P Jarvik; Murray H Brilliant; Catherine A McCarty; Iftikhar J Kullo; Jonathan L Haines; Dana C Crawford; Daniel R Masys; Dan M Roden Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Jessica R White; Vjollca Berisha; Kathryn Lane; Henri Ménager; Aaron Gettel; Carol R Braun Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2017 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Kévin Cardoso de Sá; Márcio Garcia Martins; Cristiano André da Costa; Jorge Luis Victoria Barbosa; Rodrigo da Rosa Righi Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 4.460