Jessica R White1, Vjollca Berisha1, Kathryn Lane2, Henri Ménager3, Aaron Gettel1, Carol R Braun4. 1. 1 Office of Epidemiology, Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA. 2. 2 Bureau of Environmental Surveillance and Policy, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Long Island City, NY, USA. 3. 3 Environmental Public Health Tracking Program, Bureau of Epidemiology and Public Health Informatics, Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Topeka, KS, USA. 4. 4 Bureau of Environmental Epidemiology, Missouri Department of Health & Senior Services, Jefferson City, MO, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated a novel syndromic surveillance query, developed by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) Heat Syndrome Workgroup, for identifying heat-related illness cases in near real time, using emergency department and inpatient hospital data from Maricopa County, Arizona, in 2015. METHODS: The Maricopa County Department of Public Health applied 2 queries for heat-related illness to area hospital data transmitted to the National Syndromic Surveillance Program BioSense Platform: the BioSense "heat, excessive" query and the novel CSTE query. We reviewed the line lists generated by each query and used the diagnosis code and chief complaint text fields to find probable cases of heat-related illness. For each query, we calculated positive predictive values (PPVs) for heat-related illness. RESULTS: The CSTE query identified 674 records, of which 591 were categorized as probable heat-related illness, demonstrating a PPV of 88% for heat-related illness. The BioSense query identified 791 patient records, of which 589 were probable heat-related illness, demonstrating a PPV of 74% for heat-related illness. The PPV was substantially higher for the CSTE novel and BioSense queries during the heat season (May 1 to September 30; 92% and 85%, respectively) than during the cooler seasons (55% and 29%, respectively). CONCLUSION: A novel query for heat-related illness that combined diagnosis codes, chief complaint text terms, and exclusion criteria had a high PPV for heat-related illness, particularly during the heat season. Public health departments can use this query to meet local needs; however, use of this novel query to substantially improve public health heat-related illness prevention remains to be seen.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated a novel syndromic surveillance query, developed by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) Heat Syndrome Workgroup, for identifying heat-related illness cases in near real time, using emergency department and inpatient hospital data from Maricopa County, Arizona, in 2015. METHODS: The Maricopa County Department of Public Health applied 2 queries for heat-related illness to area hospital data transmitted to the National Syndromic Surveillance Program BioSense Platform: the BioSense "heat, excessive" query and the novel CSTE query. We reviewed the line lists generated by each query and used the diagnosis code and chief complaint text fields to find probable cases of heat-related illness. For each query, we calculated positive predictive values (PPVs) for heat-related illness. RESULTS: The CSTE query identified 674 records, of which 591 were categorized as probable heat-related illness, demonstrating a PPV of 88% for heat-related illness. The BioSense query identified 791 patient records, of which 589 were probable heat-related illness, demonstrating a PPV of 74% for heat-related illness. The PPV was substantially higher for the CSTE novel and BioSense queries during the heat season (May 1 to September 30; 92% and 85%, respectively) than during the cooler seasons (55% and 29%, respectively). CONCLUSION: A novel query for heat-related illness that combined diagnosis codes, chief complaint text terms, and exclusion criteria had a high PPV for heat-related illness, particularly during the heat season. Public health departments can use this query to meet local needs; however, use of this novel query to substantially improve public health heat-related illness prevention remains to be seen.
Authors: Joseph Lombardo; Howard Burkom; Eugene Elbert; Steven Magruder; Sheryl Happel Lewis; Wayne Loschen; James Sari; Carol Sniegoski; Richard Wojcik; Julie Pavlin Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Robert Chen; Jimeng Sun; Robert S Dittus; Daniel Fabbri; Jacqueline Kirby; Cheryl L Laffer; Candace D McNaughton; Bradley Malin Journal: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 5.772
Authors: Diana B Petitti; David M Hondula; Shuo Yang; Sharon L Harlan; Gerardo Chowell Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 9.031