OBJECTIVE: Common chronic diseases such as hypertension are costly and difficult to manage. Our ultimate goal is to use data from electronic health records to predict the risk and timing of deterioration in hypertension control. Towards this goal, this work predicts the transition points at which hypertension is brought into, as well as pushed out of, control. METHOD: In a cohort of 1294 patients with hypertension enrolled in a chronic disease management program at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, patients are modeled as an array of features derived from the clinical domain over time, which are distilled into a core set using an information gain criteria regarding their predictive performance. A model for transition point prediction was then computed using a random forest classifier. RESULTS: The most predictive features for transitions in hypertension control status included hypertension assessment patterns, comorbid diagnoses, procedures and medication history. The final random forest model achieved a c-statistic of 0.836 (95% CI 0.830 to 0.842) and an accuracy of 0.773 (95% CI 0.766 to 0.780). CONCLUSIONS: This study achieved accurate prediction of transition points of hypertension control status, an important first step in the long-term goal of developing personalized hypertension management plans.
OBJECTIVE: Common chronic diseases such as hypertension are costly and difficult to manage. Our ultimate goal is to use data from electronic health records to predict the risk and timing of deterioration in hypertension control. Towards this goal, this work predicts the transition points at which hypertension is brought into, as well as pushed out of, control. METHOD: In a cohort of 1294 patients with hypertension enrolled in a chronic disease management program at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, patients are modeled as an array of features derived from the clinical domain over time, which are distilled into a core set using an information gain criteria regarding their predictive performance. A model for transition point prediction was then computed using a random forest classifier. RESULTS: The most predictive features for transitions in hypertension control status included hypertension assessment patterns, comorbid diagnoses, procedures and medication history. The final random forest model achieved a c-statistic of 0.836 (95% CI 0.830 to 0.842) and an accuracy of 0.773 (95% CI 0.766 to 0.780). CONCLUSIONS: This study achieved accurate prediction of transition points of hypertension control status, an important first step in the long-term goal of developing personalized hypertension management plans.
Authors: Robert J Carroll; Will K Thompson; Anne E Eyler; Arthur M Mandelin; Tianxi Cai; Raquel M Zink; Jennifer A Pacheco; Chad S Boomershine; Thomas A Lasko; Hua Xu; Elizabeth W Karlson; Raul G Perez; Vivian S Gainer; Shawn N Murphy; Eric M Ruderman; Richard M Pope; Robert M Plenge; Abel Ngo Kho; Katherine P Liao; Joshua C Denny Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Alison J Deary; Anne L Schumann; Helen Murfet; Stephen F Haydock; Roger S-Y Foo; Morris J Brown Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Carl J Pepine; Eileen M Handberg; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Ronald G Marks; Peter Kowey; Franz H Messerli; Giuseppe Mancia; José L Cangiano; David Garcia-Barreto; Matyas Keltai; Serap Erdine; Heather A Bristol; H Robert Kolb; George L Bakris; Jerome D Cohen; William W Parmley Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-12-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Benjamin A Goldstein; Ann Marie Navar; Michael J Pencina; John P A Ioannidis Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Rebecca A Hubbard; Eric Johnson; Jessica Chubak; Karen J Wernli; Aruna Kamineni; Andy Bogart; Carolyn M Rutter Journal: Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol Date: 2016-06-03
Authors: Nir Nissim; Mary Regina Boland; Nicholas P Tatonetti; Yuval Elovici; George Hripcsak; Yuval Shahar; Robert Moskovitch Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Chayakrit Krittanawong; Andrew S Bomback; Usman Baber; Sripal Bangalore; Franz H Messerli; W H Wilson Tang Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2018-07-06 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: Lincoln Sheets; Gregory F Petroski; Yan Zhuang; Michael A Phinney; Bin Ge; Jerry C Parker; Chi-Ren Shyu Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Robert Chen; Jimeng Sun; Robert S Dittus; Daniel Fabbri; Jacqueline Kirby; Cheryl L Laffer; Candace D McNaughton; Bradley Malin Journal: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 5.772
Authors: Robert Moskovitch; Hyunmi Choi; George Hripcsak; Nicholas Tatonetti Journal: IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 3.710