Candice Chen1, Stephen Petterson2, Robert Phillips3, Andrew Bazemore2, Fitzhugh Mullan4. 1. Department of Health Policy, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC2Dr Chen is now with the Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland. 2. Robert Graham Center, Washington, DC. 3. American Board of Family Medicine, Washington, DC. 4. Department of Health Policy, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Graduate medical education training may imprint young physicians with skills and experiences, but few studies have evaluated imprinting on physician spending patterns. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between spending patterns in the region of a physician's graduate medical education training and subsequent mean Medicare spending per beneficiary. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Secondary multilevel multivariable analysis of 2011 Medicare claims data (Part A hospital and Part B physician) for a random, nationally representative sample of family medicine and internal medicine physicians completing residency between 1992 and 2010 with Medicare patient panels of 40 or more patients (2851 physicians providing care to 491,948 Medicare beneficiaries). EXPOSURES: Locations of practice and residency training were matched with Dartmouth Atlas Hospital Referral Region (HRR) files. Training and practice HRRs were categorized into low-, average-, and high-spending groups, with approximately equal distribution of beneficiary numbers. There were 674 physicians in low-spending training and low-spending practice HRRs, 180 in average-spending training/low-spending practice, 178 in high-spending training/low-spending practice, 253 in low-spending training/average-spending practice, 417 in average-spending training/average-spending practice, 210 in high-spending training/average-spending practice, 97 in low-spending training/high-spending practice, 275 in average-spending training/high-spending practice, and 567 in high-spending training/high-spending practice. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mean physician spending per Medicare beneficiary. RESULTS: For physicians practicing in high-spending regions, those trained in high-spending regions had a mean spending per beneficiary per year $1926 higher (95% CI, $889-$2963) than those trained in low-spending regions. For practice in average-spending HRRs, mean spending was $897 higher (95% CI, $71-$1723) for physicians trained in high- vs low-spending regions. For practice in low-spending HRRs, the difference across training HRR levels was not significant ($533; 95% CI, -$46 to $1112). After controlling for patient, community, and physician characteristics, there was a 7% difference (95% CI, 2%-12%) in patient expenditures between low- and high-spending training HRRs. Across all practice HRRs, this corresponded to an estimated $522 difference (95% CI, $146-$919) between low- and high-spending training regions. For physicians 1 to 7 years in practice, there was a 29% difference ($2434; 95% CI, $1004-$4111) in spending between those trained in low- and high-spending regions; however, after 16 to 19 years, there was no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among general internists and family physicians who completed residency training between 1992 and 2010, the spending patterns in the HRR in which their residency program was located were associated with expenditures for subsequent care they provided as practicing physicians for Medicare beneficiaries. Interventions during residency training may have the potential to help control future health care spending.
IMPORTANCE: Graduate medical education training may imprint young physicians with skills and experiences, but few studies have evaluated imprinting on physician spending patterns. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between spending patterns in the region of a physician's graduate medical education training and subsequent mean Medicare spending per beneficiary. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Secondary multilevel multivariable analysis of 2011 Medicare claims data (Part A hospital and Part B physician) for a random, nationally representative sample of family medicine and internal medicine physicians completing residency between 1992 and 2010 with Medicare patient panels of 40 or more patients (2851 physicians providing care to 491,948 Medicare beneficiaries). EXPOSURES: Locations of practice and residency training were matched with Dartmouth Atlas Hospital Referral Region (HRR) files. Training and practice HRRs were categorized into low-, average-, and high-spending groups, with approximately equal distribution of beneficiary numbers. There were 674 physicians in low-spending training and low-spending practice HRRs, 180 in average-spending training/low-spending practice, 178 in high-spending training/low-spending practice, 253 in low-spending training/average-spending practice, 417 in average-spending training/average-spending practice, 210 in high-spending training/average-spending practice, 97 in low-spending training/high-spending practice, 275 in average-spending training/high-spending practice, and 567 in high-spending training/high-spending practice. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mean physician spending per Medicare beneficiary. RESULTS: For physicians practicing in high-spending regions, those trained in high-spending regions had a mean spending per beneficiary per year $1926 higher (95% CI, $889-$2963) than those trained in low-spending regions. For practice in average-spending HRRs, mean spending was $897 higher (95% CI, $71-$1723) for physicians trained in high- vs low-spending regions. For practice in low-spending HRRs, the difference across training HRR levels was not significant ($533; 95% CI, -$46 to $1112). After controlling for patient, community, and physician characteristics, there was a 7% difference (95% CI, 2%-12%) in patient expenditures between low- and high-spending training HRRs. Across all practice HRRs, this corresponded to an estimated $522 difference (95% CI, $146-$919) between low- and high-spending training regions. For physicians 1 to 7 years in practice, there was a 29% difference ($2434; 95% CI, $1004-$4111) in spending between those trained in low- and high-spending regions; however, after 16 to 19 years, there was no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among general internists and family physicians who completed residency training between 1992 and 2010, the spending patterns in the HRR in which their residency program was located were associated with expenditures for subsequent care they provided as practicing physicians for Medicare beneficiaries. Interventions during residency training may have the potential to help control future health care spending.
Authors: C Jessica Dine; Lisa M Bellini; Gretchen Diemer; Allison Ferris; Ashish Rana; Gina Simoncini; William Surkis; Charles Rothschild; David A Asch; Judy A Shea; Andrew J Epstein Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2015-12
Authors: Andrea N Leep Hunderfund; Stephanie R Starr; Liselotte N Dyrbye; Elizabeth G Baxley; Jed D Gonzalo; Bonnie M Miller; Paul George; Helen K Morgan; Bradley L Allen; Ari Hoffman; Tonya L Fancher; Jay Mandrekar; Darcy A Reed Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Carrie H Colla; Nancy E Morden; Thomas D Sequist; Alexander J Mainor; Zhonghe Li; Meredith B Rosenthal Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-02-19 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Eric Young; Chad Stickrath; Monica C McNulty; Aaron J Calderon; Elizabeth Chapman; Jed D Gonzalo; Ethan F Kuperman; Max Lopez; Christopher J Smith; Joseph R Sweigart; Cecelia N Theobald; Robert E Burke Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 5.128