Literature DB >> 8366680

Influencing behavior of physicians ordering laboratory tests: a literature study.

P Axt-Adam1, J C van der Wouden, E van der Does.   

Abstract

There are various reasons why physicians order laboratory tests. Earlier studies have shown that in many cases test-ordering behavior lacks efficiency, resulting in excessive laboratory utilization. Throughout the years various attempts have been made to improve this situation. This review, based on the literature of the past 20 years, gives a survey of interventions and their effectiveness. Various types of education are discussed: general, cost-control oriented and education by means of guidelines, protocols, decision support systems, and feedback (on test ordering or cost). The discussion addresses the quality and apparent restrictions of the studies, and provides possible causes of the widely varying, but mostly low success rates. The long-term effectiveness of interventions aiming at better laboratory ordering is rather unfavorable.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8366680     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199309000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  36 in total

1.  Analysis of the practice guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners with respect to the use of blood tests.

Authors:  M A van Wijk; A M Bohnen; J van der Lei
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Pathology tests: is the time for demand management ripe at last?

Authors:  G Gopal Rao; M Crook; M L Tillyer
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Data feedback efforts in quality improvement: lessons learned from US hospitals.

Authors:  E H Bradley; E S Holmboe; J A Mattera; S A Roumanis; M J Radford; H M Krumholz
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-02

Review 4.  Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  J Grimshaw; N Freemantle; S Wallace; I Russell; B Hurwitz; I Watt; A Long; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03

5.  Unnecessary repeat requesting of tests: an audit in a government hospital immunology laboratory.

Authors:  J Kwok; B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback.

Authors:  Gro Jamtvedt; Jane M Young; Doris T Kristoffersen; Mary Ann O'Brien; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-12

7.  The impact of structured laboratory routines in computerized medical records in a primary care service setting.

Authors:  Daniel A Vardy; Tzachit Simon; Yehuda Limoni; Oded Kuperman; Ira Rabzon; Arnon Cohen; Leah Cohen; Pesach Shvartzman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  The effect of automated test rejection on repeat requesting.

Authors:  A Sharma; M Salzmann
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Functional Somatic Symptoms.

Authors:  Casper Roenneberg; Heribert Sattel; Rainer Schaefert; Peter Henningsen; Constanze Hausteiner-Wiehle
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  The diluting effect of medical work groups on feedback efficacy in changing physician's practice.

Authors:  C Sicotte; R Pineault; C Tilquin; A P Contandriopoulos
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1996-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.