OBJECTIVES: Although the costs associated with whole-genome and whole-exome next-generation sequencing continue to decline, they remain prohibitively expensive for large-scale studies of genetic variation. As an alternative, custom-target sequencing has become a common methodology on the basis of its favorable balance between cost, throughput, and deep coverage. METHODS: We have developed PGRNseq, a custom-capture panel of 84 genes with associations to pharmacogenetic phenotypes, as a tool to explore the relationship between drug response and genetic variation, both common and rare. We utilized a set of 32 diverse HapMap trios and two clinical cohorts to assess platform performance, accuracy, and ability to discover novel variation. RESULTS: We found that PGRNseq generates ultra-deep coverage data (mean=496x) that are over 99.8% concordant with orthogonal datasets. In addition, in our testing sets, PGRNseq identified many novel, rare variants of interest, underscoring its value in both research and clinical settings. CONCLUSION: PGRNseq is an ideal platform for carrying out sequencing-based analyses of pharmacogenetic variation in large cohorts. In addition, the high accuracy associated with genotypes from PGRNseq highlight its utility as a clinical test.
OBJECTIVES: Although the costs associated with whole-genome and whole-exome next-generation sequencing continue to decline, they remain prohibitively expensive for large-scale studies of genetic variation. As an alternative, custom-target sequencing has become a common methodology on the basis of its favorable balance between cost, throughput, and deep coverage. METHODS: We have developed PGRNseq, a custom-capture panel of 84 genes with associations to pharmacogenetic phenotypes, as a tool to explore the relationship between drug response and genetic variation, both common and rare. We utilized a set of 32 diverse HapMap trios and two clinical cohorts to assess platform performance, accuracy, and ability to discover novel variation. RESULTS: We found that PGRNseq generates ultra-deep coverage data (mean=496x) that are over 99.8% concordant with orthogonal datasets. In addition, in our testing sets, PGRNseq identified many novel, rare variants of interest, underscoring its value in both research and clinical settings. CONCLUSION:PGRNseq is an ideal platform for carrying out sequencing-based analyses of pharmacogenetic variation in large cohorts. In addition, the high accuracy associated with genotypes from PGRNseq highlight its utility as a clinical test.
Authors: Laura B Ramsey; Gitte H Bruun; Wenjian Yang; Lisa R Treviño; Selina Vattathil; Paul Scheet; Cheng Cheng; Gary L Rosner; Kathleen M Giacomini; Yiping Fan; Alex Sparreboom; Torben S Mikkelsen; Thomas J Corydon; Ching-Hon Pui; William E Evans; Mary V Relling Journal: Genome Res Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Daniel S Budnitz; Daniel A Pollock; Kelly N Weidenbach; Aaron B Mendelsohn; Thomas J Schroeder; Joseph L Annest Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-10-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Feng Wang; Hui Wang; Han-Fang Tuan; Duy H Nguyen; Vincent Sun; Vafa Keser; Sara J Bowne; Lori S Sullivan; Hongrong Luo; Ling Zhao; Xia Wang; Jacques E Zaneveld; Jason S Salvo; Sorath Siddiqui; Louise Mao; Dianna K Wheaton; David G Birch; Kari E Branham; John R Heckenlively; Cindy Wen; Ken Flagg; Henry Ferreyra; Jacqueline Pei; Ayesha Khan; Huanan Ren; Keqing Wang; Irma Lopez; Raheel Qamar; Juan C Zenteno; Raul Ayala-Ramirez; Beatriz Buentello-Volante; Qing Fu; David A Simpson; Yumei Li; Ruifang Sui; Giuliana Silvestri; Stephen P Daiger; Robert K Koenekoop; Kang Zhang; Rui Chen Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Colin C Pritchard; Christina Smith; Stephen J Salipante; Ming K Lee; Anne M Thornton; Alex S Nord; Cassandra Gulden; Sonia S Kupfer; Elizabeth M Swisher; Robin L Bennett; Akiva P Novetsky; Gail P Jarvik; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Paul J Goodfellow; Mary-Claire King; Jonathan F Tait; Tom Walsh Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean Journal: Nature Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Kelly E Caudle; Teri E Klein; James M Hoffman; Daniel J Muller; Michelle Whirl-Carrillo; Li Gong; Ellen M McDonagh; Katrin Sangkuhl; Caroline F Thorn; Matthias Schwab; Jose A G Agundez; Robert R Freimuth; Vojtech Huser; Ming Ta Michael Lee; Otito F Iwuchukwu; Kristine R Crews; Stuart A Scott; Mia Wadelius; Jesse J Swen; Rachel F Tyndale; C Michael Stein; Dan Roden; Mary V Relling; Marc S Williams; Samuel G Johnson Journal: Curr Drug Metab Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Maya S Safarova; Eric W Klee; Linnea M Baudhuin; Erin M Winkler; Michelle L Kluge; Suzette J Bielinski; Janet E Olson; Iftikhar J Kullo Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Suzette J Bielinski; Jennifer L St Sauver; Janet E Olson; Nicholas B Larson; John L Black; Steven E Scherer; Matthew E Bernard; Eric Boerwinkle; Bijan J Borah; Pedro J Caraballo; Timothy B Curry; HarshaVardhan Doddapaneni; Christine M Formea; Robert R Freimuth; Richard A Gibbs; Jyothsna Giri; Matthew A Hathcock; Jianhong Hu; Debra J Jacobson; Leila A Jones; Sara Kalla; Tyler H Koep; Viktoriya Korchina; Christie L Kovar; Sandra Lee; Hongfang Liu; Eric T Matey; Michaela E McGree; Tammy M McAllister; Ann M Moyer; Donna M Muzny; Wayne T Nicholson; Lance J Oyen; Xiang Qin; Ritika Raj; Véronique L Roger; Carolyn R Rohrer Vitek; Jason L Ross; Richard R Sharp; Paul Y Takahashi; Eric Venner; Kimberly Walker; Liwei Wang; Qiaoyan Wang; Jessica A Wright; Tsung-Jung Wu; Liewei Wang; Richard M Weinshilboum Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Berta Almoguera; Kimberly F Doheny; Robert R Freimuth; Adam S Gordon; Hakon Hakonarson; Jared B Hawkins; Ammar Husami; Lynn C Ivacic; Iftikhar J Kullo; Michael D Linderman; Teri A Manolio; Aniwaa Owusu Obeng; Renata Pellegrino; Cynthia A Prows; Marylyn D Ritchie; Maureen E Smith; Sarah C Stallings; Wendy A Wolf; Kejian Zhang; Stuart A Scott Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: In-Hee Lee; Jose A Negron; Carles Hernandez-Ferrer; William Jefferson Alvarez; Kenneth D Mandl; Sek Won Kong Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Julie-Anne Tanner; Andy Z Zhu; Katrina G Claw; Bhagwat Prasad; Viktoriya Korchina; Jianhong Hu; HarshaVardhan Doddapaneni; Donna M Muzny; Erin G Schuetz; Caryn Lerman; Kenneth E Thummel; Steven E Scherer; Rachel F Tyndale Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Sara L Van Driest; Quinn S Wells; Sarah Stallings; William S Bush; Adam Gordon; Deborah A Nickerson; Jerry H Kim; David R Crosslin; Gail P Jarvik; David S Carrell; James D Ralston; Eric B Larson; Suzette J Bielinski; Janet E Olson; Zi Ye; Iftikhar J Kullo; Noura S Abul-Husn; Stuart A Scott; Erwin Bottinger; Berta Almoguera; John Connolly; Rosetta Chiavacci; Hakon Hakonarson; Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Vivian Pan; Stephen D Persell; Maureen Smith; Rex L Chisholm; Terrie E Kitchner; Max M He; Murray H Brilliant; John R Wallace; Kimberly F Doheny; M Benjamin Shoemaker; Rongling Li; Teri A Manolio; Thomas E Callis; Daniela Macaya; Marc S Williams; David Carey; Jamie D Kapplinger; Michael J Ackerman; Marylyn D Ritchie; Joshua C Denny; Dan M Roden Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 56.272