Literature DB >> 26746457

Association of Arrhythmia-Related Genetic Variants With Phenotypes Documented in Electronic Medical Records.

Sara L Van Driest1, Quinn S Wells1, Sarah Stallings1, William S Bush2, Adam Gordon3, Deborah A Nickerson3, Jerry H Kim3, David R Crosslin3, Gail P Jarvik3, David S Carrell4, James D Ralston4, Eric B Larson4, Suzette J Bielinski5, Janet E Olson5, Zi Ye5, Iftikhar J Kullo5, Noura S Abul-Husn6, Stuart A Scott6, Erwin Bottinger6, Berta Almoguera7, John Connolly7, Rosetta Chiavacci7, Hakon Hakonarson8, Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik9, Vivian Pan9, Stephen D Persell9, Maureen Smith9, Rex L Chisholm9, Terrie E Kitchner10, Max M He10, Murray H Brilliant10, John R Wallace11, Kimberly F Doheny12, M Benjamin Shoemaker1, Rongling Li13, Teri A Manolio13, Thomas E Callis14, Daniela Macaya15, Marc S Williams16, David Carey16, Jamie D Kapplinger5, Michael J Ackerman5, Marylyn D Ritchie17, Joshua C Denny1, Dan M Roden1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Large-scale DNA sequencing identifies incidental rare variants in established Mendelian disease genes, but the frequency of related clinical phenotypes in unselected patient populations is not well established. Phenotype data from electronic medical records (EMRs) may provide a resource to assess the clinical relevance of rare variants.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical phenotypes from EMRs for individuals with variants designated as pathogenic by expert review in arrhythmia susceptibility genes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study included 2022 individuals recruited for nonantiarrhythmic drug exposure phenotypes from October 5, 2012, to September 30, 2013, for the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network Pharmacogenomics project from 7 US academic medical centers. Variants in SCN5A and KCNH2, disease genes for long QT and Brugada syndromes, were assessed for potential pathogenicity by 3 laboratories with ion channel expertise and by comparison with the ClinVar database. Relevant phenotypes were determined from EMRs, with data available from 2002 (or earlier for some sites) through September 10, 2014. EXPOSURES: One or more variants designated as pathogenic in SCN5A or KCNH2. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Arrhythmia or electrocardiographic (ECG) phenotypes defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, ECG data, and manual EMR review.
RESULTS: Among 2022 study participants (median age, 61 years [interquartile range, 56-65 years]; 1118 [55%] female; 1491 [74%] white), a total of 122 rare (minor allele frequency <0.5%) nonsynonymous and splice-site variants in 2 arrhythmia susceptibility genes were identified in 223 individuals (11% of the study cohort). Forty-two variants in 63 participants were designated potentially pathogenic by at least 1 laboratory or ClinVar, with low concordance across laboratories (Cohen κ = 0.26). An ICD-9 code for arrhythmia was found in 11 of 63 (17%) variant carriers vs 264 of 1959 (13%) of those without variants (difference, +4%; 95% CI, -5% to +13%; P = .35). In the 1270 (63%) with ECGs, corrected QT intervals were not different in variant carriers vs those without (median, 429 vs 439 milliseconds; difference, -10 milliseconds; 95% CI, -16 to +3 milliseconds; P = .17). After manual review, 22 of 63 participants (35%) with designated variants had any ECG or arrhythmia phenotype, and only 2 had corrected QT interval longer than 500 milliseconds. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among laboratories experienced in genetic testing for cardiac arrhythmia disorders, there was low concordance in designating SCN5A and KCNH2 variants as pathogenic. In an unselected population, the putatively pathogenic genetic variants were not associated with an abnormal phenotype. These findings raise questions about the implications of notifying patients of incidental genetic findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26746457      PMCID: PMC4758131          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.17701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  35 in total

1.  Prevalence of the congenital long-QT syndrome.

Authors:  Peter J Schwartz; Marco Stramba-Badiale; Lia Crotti; Matteo Pedrazzini; Alessandra Besana; Giuliano Bosi; Fulvio Gabbarini; Karine Goulene; Roberto Insolia; Savina Mannarino; Fabio Mosca; Luigi Nespoli; Alessandro Rimini; Enrico Rosati; Patrizia Salice; Carla Spazzolini
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Validation of electronic medical record-based phenotyping algorithms: results and lessons learned from the eMERGE network.

Authors:  Katherine M Newton; Peggy L Peissig; Abel Ngo Kho; Suzette J Bielinski; Richard L Berg; Vidhu Choudhary; Melissa Basford; Christopher G Chute; Iftikhar J Kullo; Rongling Li; Jennifer A Pacheco; Luke V Rasmussen; Leslie Spangler; Joshua C Denny
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  New approaches to molecular diagnosis.

Authors:  Bruce R Korf; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Spectrum and prevalence of cardiac sodium channel variants among black, white, Asian, and Hispanic individuals: implications for arrhythmogenic susceptibility and Brugada/long QT syndrome genetic testing.

Authors:  Michael J Ackerman; Igor Splawski; Jonathan C Makielski; David J Tester; Melissa L Will; Katherine W Timothy; Mark T Keating; Gregg Jones; Monica Chadha; Christopher R Burrow; J Claiborne Stephens; Chuanbo Xu; Richard Judson; Mark E Curran
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Cost-effectiveness of neonatal ECG screening for the long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Silvana Quaglini; Carla Rognoni; Carla Spazzolini; Silvia G Priori; Savina Mannarino; Peter J Schwartz
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Genomic structure of three long QT syndrome genes: KVLQT1, HERG, and KCNE1.

Authors:  I Splawski; J Shen; K W Timothy; G M Vincent; M H Lehmann; M T Keating
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 5.736

7.  Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Gerard T Berry; Leslie G Biesecker; David P Dimmock; James P Evans; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri R Hegde; Sarah Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Ian Krantz; Amy L McGuire; David T Miller; Michael F Murray; Robert L Nussbaum; Sharon E Plon; Heidi L Rehm; Howard J Jacob
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Incidental findings in clinical genomics: a clarification.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype.

Authors:  Melissa J Landrum; Jennifer M Lee; George R Riley; Wonhee Jang; Wendy S Rubinstein; Deanna M Church; Donna R Maglott
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Design and anticipated outcomes of the eMERGE-PGx project: a multicenter pilot for preemptive pharmacogenomics in electronic health record systems.

Authors:  L J Rasmussen-Torvik; S C Stallings; A S Gordon; B Almoguera; M A Basford; S J Bielinski; A Brautbar; M H Brilliant; D S Carrell; J J Connolly; D R Crosslin; K F Doheny; C J Gallego; O Gottesman; D S Kim; K A Leppig; R Li; S Lin; S Manzi; A R Mejia; J A Pacheco; V Pan; J Pathak; C L Perry; J F Peterson; C A Prows; J Ralston; L V Rasmussen; M D Ritchie; S Sadhasivam; S A Scott; M Smith; A Vega; A A Vinks; S Volpi; W A Wolf; E Bottinger; R L Chisholm; C G Chute; J L Haines; J B Harley; B Keating; I A Holm; I J Kullo; G P Jarvik; E B Larson; T Manolio; C A McCarty; D A Nickerson; S E Scherer; M S Williams; D M Roden; J C Denny
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  71 in total

1.  Variability in assigning pathogenicity to incidental findings: insights from LDLR sequence linked to the electronic health record in 1013 individuals.

Authors:  Maya S Safarova; Eric W Klee; Linnea M Baudhuin; Erin M Winkler; Michelle L Kluge; Suzette J Bielinski; Janet E Olson; Iftikhar J Kullo
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Which Results to Return: Subjective Judgments in Selecting Medically Actionable Genes.

Authors:  Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; John M Conley; Arlene M Davis; Anya E R Prince; R Jean Cadigan
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 3.  Precision medicine in cardiology.

Authors:  Elliott M Antman; Joseph Loscalzo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Deep learning for cardiovascular medicine: a practical primer.

Authors:  Chayakrit Krittanawong; Kipp W Johnson; Robert S Rosenson; Zhen Wang; Mehmet Aydar; Usman Baber; James K Min; W H Wilson Tang; Jonathan L Halperin; Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Analyzing and Reanalyzing the Genome: Findings from the MedSeq Project.

Authors:  Kalotina Machini; Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy; Danielle R Azzariti; Himanshu Sharma; Peter Rossetti; Lisa Mahanta; Laura Hutchinson; Heather McLaughlin; Robert C Green; Matthew Lebo; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Precision medicine with electronic medical records: from the patients and for the patients.

Authors:  Losiana Nayak; Indrani Ray; Rajat K De
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

7.  Deep Mutational Scan of an SCN5A Voltage Sensor.

Authors:  Andrew M Glazer; Brett M Kroncke; Kenneth A Matreyek; Tao Yang; Yuko Wada; Tiffany Shields; Joe-Elie Salem; Douglas M Fowler; Dan M Roden
Journal:  Circ Genom Precis Med       Date:  2020-01-12

Review 8.  Opportunities and challenges in developing risk prediction models with electronic health records data: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin A Goldstein; Ann Marie Navar; Michael J Pencina; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Growing Pains in Cardiovascular Genetics.

Authors:  Dan M Roden
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  From Genotype to Phenotype.

Authors:  Michael Mackley; Karen McGuire; Jenny Taylor; Hugh Watkins; Elizabeth Ormondroyd
Journal:  Circ Genom Precis Med       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.