Literature DB >> 31114935

Sequencing XMET genes to promote genotype-guided risk assessment and precision medicine.

Yaqiong Jin1, Geng Chen2, Wenming Xiao3, Huixiao Hong3, Joshua Xu3, Yongli Guo1, Wenzhong Xiao4, Tieliu Shi2, Leming Shi5, Weida Tong3, Baitang Ning6.   

Abstract

High-throughput next generation sequencing (NGS) is a shotgun approach applied in a parallel fashion by which the genome is fragmented and sequenced through small pieces and then analyzed either by aligning to a known reference genome or by de novo assembly without reference genome. This technology has led researchers to conduct an explosion of sequencing related projects in multidisciplinary fields of science. However, due to the limitations of sequencing-based chemistry, length of sequencing reads and the complexity of genes, it is difficult to determine the sequences of some portions of the human genome, leaving gaps in genomic data that frustrate further analysis. Particularly, some complex genes are difficult to be accurately sequenced or mapped because they contain high GC-content and/or low complexity regions, and complicated pseudogenes, such as the genes encoding xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes and transporters (XMETs). The genetic variants in XMET genes are critical to predicate inter-individual variability in drug efficacy, drug safety and susceptibility to environmental toxicity. We summarized and discussed challenges, wet-lab methods, and bioinformatics algorithms in sequencing "complex" XMET genes, which may provide insightful information in the application of NGS technology for implementation in toxicogenomics and pharmacogenomics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  next generation sequencing; pharmacogenomics; precision medicine; toxicogenomics; xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes and transporters

Year:  2019        PMID: 31114935      PMCID: PMC6612563          DOI: 10.1007/s11427-018-9479-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci China Life Sci        ISSN: 1674-7305            Impact factor:   6.038


  99 in total

1.  Simultaneous structural variation discovery among multiple paired-end sequenced genomes.

Authors:  Fereydoun Hormozdiari; Iman Hajirasouliha; Andrew McPherson; Evan E Eichler; S Cenk Sahinalp
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Genetic analysis of PHIP intestinal mutations in MutaMouse.

Authors:  A M Lynch; N J Gooderham; D S Davies; A R Boobis
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 3.  Copy number variants in pharmacogenetic genes.

Authors:  Yijing He; Janelle M Hoskins; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 11.951

4.  A geometric approach for classification and comparison of structural variants.

Authors:  Suzanne Sindi; Elena Helman; Ali Bashir; Benjamin J Raphael
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Comparison of genome sequencing and clinical genotyping for pharmacogenes.

Authors:  W Yang; G Wu; U Broeckel; C A Smith; V Turner; C E Haidar; S Wang; R Carter; S E Karol; G Neale; K R Crews; J J Yang; C G Mullighan; J R Downing; W E Evans; M V Relling
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 6.  Sequencing depth and coverage: key considerations in genomic analyses.

Authors:  David Sims; Ian Sudbery; Nicholas E Ilott; Andreas Heger; Chris P Ponting
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Association between NAT2, CYP1A1, and CYP1A2 genotypes, heterocyclic aromatic amines, and prostate cancer risk: a case control study in Japan.

Authors:  Masahide Koda; Motoki Iwasaki; Yuko Yamano; Xi Lu; Takahiko Katoh
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.674

8.  Assessing the capability of massively parallel sequencing for opportunistic pharmacogenetic screening.

Authors:  David Ng; Celine S Hong; Larry N Singh; Jennifer J Johnston; James C Mullikin; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Association between polymorphism of GSTP1, GSTT1, GSTM1 and CYP2E1 genes and susceptibility to benzene-induced hematotoxicity.

Authors:  Mohamad Amin Nourozi; Masoud Neghab; Javad Tavakkoly Bazzaz; Saharnaz Nejat; Yaser Mansoori; Seyed Jamaleddin Shahtaheri
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Personalized copy number and segmental duplication maps using next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Can Alkan; Jeffrey M Kidd; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Gozde Aksay; Francesca Antonacci; Fereydoun Hormozdiari; Jacob O Kitzman; Carl Baker; Maika Malig; Onur Mutlu; S Cenk Sahinalp; Richard A Gibbs; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-08-30       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  1 in total

1.  DNMIVD: DNA methylation interactive visualization database.

Authors:  Wubin Ding; Jiwei Chen; Guoshuang Feng; Geng Chen; Jun Wu; Yongli Guo; Xin Ni; Tieliu Shi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.