Literature DB >> 26728892

Role of prefrontal 5-HT in the strain-dependent variation in sign-tracking behavior of C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice.

P Campus1, A Accoto1, M Maiolati1, C Latagliata2, C Orsini3,4,5.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: The expression of sign-tracking (ST) phenotype over goal-tracking (GT) phenotype has been associated to different aspects of impulsive behavior, and depletions of brain serotonin (5-HT) have been shown to selectively increase impulsive action as well as ST.
OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed at testing the relationship between reduced brain 5-HT availability and expression of ST phenotype in a genetic model of individual variation in brain 5-HT functionality. Inbred DBA/2J (DBA) mice are homozygous for the allelic variant of the TPH-2 gene causing lower brain 5-HT function in comparison with C57BL/6J (C57) inbred mice. MATERIALS: Young adult (10 weeks) and adult (14 weeks) C57 and DBA mice were trained in a Pavlovian conditioned approach (PCA) paradigm. Lever-directed (ST) and magazine-directed (GT) responses were measured in 12 daily conditioning sessions. In a second experiment, effect of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) 5-HT depletion by the neurotoxin 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT) was assessed on acquisition of ST phenotype in adult C57 mice, according to their higher 5-HT functionality compared to DBA mice.
RESULTS: Young adult mice of both strains developed ST phenotype, but only adult DBA mice developed ST phenotype. 5-HT depletion in the mPFC of adult C57 mice completely changed their phenotype, as shown by their increased ST.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that ST phenotype can be the expression of a transitory late developmental stage and that genetic factors determine persistence of this phenotype in adulthood. These findings also support a role of 5-HT transmission in PFC in constraining development of ST phenotype.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoshaping; Development; Goal tracking; Inbred strain; Individual differences; Pavlovian approach; Serotonin; Sign tracking

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26728892     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-015-4192-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  49 in total

1.  Measuring anxiety- and locomotion-related behaviours in mice: a new way of using old tests.

Authors:  Leanne M Fraser; Richard E Brown; Ahmed Hussin; Mara Fontana; Ashley Whittaker; Timothy P O'Leary; Lauren Lederle; Andrew Holmes; André Ramos
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Stanley J Watson; Terry E Robinson; Huda Akil
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Activity and impulsive action are controlled by different genetic and environmental factors.

Authors:  M Loos; S van der Sluis; Z Bochdanovits; I J van Zutphen; T Pattij; O Stiedl; A B Smit; S Spijker
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.449

Review 4.  Developmental trajectories during adolescence in males and females: a cross-species understanding of underlying brain changes.

Authors:  Heather C Brenhouse; Susan L Andersen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Impact of strain and D-amphetamine on impulsivity (delay discounting) in inbred mice.

Authors:  Christa M Helms; Jamie M Reeves; Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Tryptophan hydroxylase-2 (TPH2) in disorders of cognitive control and emotion regulation: a perspective.

Authors:  Jonas Waider; Naozumi Araragi; Lise Gutknecht; Klaus-Peter Lesch
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 4.905

7.  Sign- versus goal-tracking: effects of conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distance.

Authors:  F J Silva; K M Silva; J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Prefrontal/amygdalar system determines stress coping behavior through 5-HT/GABA connection.

Authors:  Diego Andolina; Dario Maran; Alessandro Valzania; David Conversi; Stefano Puglisi-Allegra
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Pavlovian autoshaping procedures increase plasma corticosterone and levels of norepinephrine and serotonin in prefrontal cortex in rats.

Authors:  Arthur Tomie; Aidaluz D Tirado; Lung Yu; Larissa A Pohorecky
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Quantifying individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to reward cues.

Authors:  Paul J Meyer; Vedran Lovic; Benjamin T Saunders; Lindsay M Yager; Shelly B Flagel; Jonathan D Morrow; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Chronic Stress Prevents Cortico-Accumbens Cue Encoding and Alters Conditioned Approach.

Authors:  Mitchell G Spring; Aaron Caccamise; Elizabeth A Panther; Bethany M Windsor; Karan R Soni; Jayme R McReynolds; Daniel S Wheeler; John R Mantsch; Robert A Wheeler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Modeling human methamphetamine use patterns in mice: chronic and binge methamphetamine exposure, reward function and neurochemistry.

Authors:  James P Kesby; Ariel Chang; Athina Markou; Svetlana Semenova
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.280

3.  From skinner box to daily life: Sign-tracker phenotype co-segregates with impulsivity, compulsivity, and addiction tendencies in humans.

Authors:  Martino Schettino; Ilenia Ceccarelli; Mika Tarvainen; Marialuisa Martelli; Cristina Orsini; Cristina Ottaviani
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.526

4.  Interactions Between Experience, Genotype and Sex in the Development of Individual Coping Strategies.

Authors:  Rossella Ventura; Simona Cabib; Lucy Babicola; Diego Andolina; Matteo Di Segni; Cristina Orsini
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 5.  Mapping sign-tracking and goal-tracking onto human behaviors.

Authors:  Janna M Colaizzi; Shelly B Flagel; Michelle A Joyner; Ashley N Gearhardt; Jennifer L Stewart; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  The paraventricular thalamus is a critical mediator of top-down control of cue-motivated behavior in rats.

Authors:  Paolo Campus; Ignacio R Covelo; Youngsoo Kim; Aram Parsegian; Brittany N Kuhn; Sofia A Lopez; John F Neumaier; Susan M Ferguson; Leah C Solberg Woods; Martin Sarter; Shelly B Flagel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Neurobiological Basis of Individual Variation in Stimulus-Reward Learning.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2017-01-05

8.  Sex-dependent impact of early-life stress and adult immobilization in the attribution of incentive salience in rats.

Authors:  Silvia Fuentes; Javier Carrasco; Abigail Hatto; Juan Navarro; Antonio Armario; Manel Monsonet; Jordi Ortiz; Roser Nadal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sex differences in nicotine-enhanced Pavlovian conditioned approach in rats.

Authors:  Sierra J Stringfield; Aric C Madayag; Charlotte A Boettiger; Donita L Robinson
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 5.027

10.  Sign and goal tracker rats process differently the incentive salience of a conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  Almudena Serrano-Barroso; Juan Pedro Vargas; Estrella Diaz; Patricio O'Donnell; Juan Carlos López
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.