Literature DB >> 15219711

Pavlovian autoshaping procedures increase plasma corticosterone and levels of norepinephrine and serotonin in prefrontal cortex in rats.

Arthur Tomie1, Aidaluz D Tirado, Lung Yu, Larissa A Pohorecky.   

Abstract

Pavlovian autoshaping procedures provide for pairings of a small object conditioned stimulus (CS) with a rewarding substance unconditioned stimulus (US), resulting in the acquisition of complex sequences of CS-directed skeletal-motor responses or autoshaping conditioned responses (CRs). Autoshaping procedures induce higher post-session levels of corticosterone than in controls receiving CS and US randomly, and the enhanced post-session corticosterone levels have been attributed to the appetitive or arousal-inducing effects of autoshaping procedures. Enhanced corticosterone release can be induced by aversive stimulation or stressful situations, where it is often accompanied by higher levels of norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin (5-HT) in prefrontal cortex (PFC) but not in striatum (ST). Effects of autoshaping procedures on post-session corticosterone levels, NE contents in PFC, and 5-HT contents in PFC and ST were investigated in male Long-Evans rats. Post-session blood samples revealed higher corticosterone levels in the CS-US Paired group (n = 46) than in the CS-US Random control group (n = 21), and brain samples revealed higher levels of PFC NE and 5-HT in CS-US Paired group. Striatal 5-HT levels were unaltered by the autoshaping procedures. Autoshaping procedures provide for appetitive stimulation and induce an arousal-like state, as well as simultaneous stress-like changes in plasma corticosterone and monoamine levels in PFC. Autoshaping, therefore, may be useful for the study of endocrine and central processes associated with appetitive conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15219711     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  16 in total

Review 1.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  Initial uncertainty in Pavlovian reward prediction persistently elevates incentive salience and extends sign-tracking to normally unattractive cues.

Authors:  Mike J F Robinson; Patrick Anselme; Adam M Fischer; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Environmental enrichment reduces attribution of incentive salience to a food-associated stimulus.

Authors:  Joshua S Beckmann; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Adrenergic manipulation inhibits pavlovian conditioned approach behaviors.

Authors:  Kyle Z Pasquariello; Marina Han; Cagla Unal; Paul J Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Role of prefrontal 5-HT in the strain-dependent variation in sign-tracking behavior of C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice.

Authors:  P Campus; A Accoto; M Maiolati; C Latagliata; C Orsini
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Novelty seeking, incentive salience and acquisition of cocaine self-administration in the rat.

Authors:  Joshua S Beckmann; Julie A Marusich; Cassandra D Gipson; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  A glucocorticoid receptor antagonist reduces sign-tracking behavior in male Japanese quail.

Authors:  Beth Ann Rice; Shannon E Eaton; Mark A Prendergast; Chana K Akins
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Roles of nucleus accumbens and basolateral amygdala in autoshaped lever pressing.

Authors:  Stephen E Chang; Daniel S Wheeler; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Reward uncertainty enhances incentive salience attribution as sign-tracking.

Authors:  Patrick Anselme; Mike J F Robinson; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Behavioral characteristics and neurobiological substrates shared by Pavlovian sign-tracking and drug abuse.

Authors:  Arthur Tomie; Kathryn L Grimes; Larissa A Pohorecky
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.