Literature DB >> 23271515

A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates.

Claudia R Albornoz1, Peter B Bach, Babak J Mehrara, Joseph J Disa, Andrea L Pusic, Colleen M McCarthy, Peter G Cordeiro, Evan Matros.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite its benefits in body image, self-esteem, sexuality, and quality of life, historically fewer than 25 percent of patients undergo immediate breast reconstruction. After passage of the Women Health and Cancer Rights Act, studies failed to demonstrate changes in reconstructive rates. A recent single-year report suggests significant shifts in U.S. breast reconstruction patterns. The authors' goal was to assess long-term trends in rates and types of immediate reconstruction.
METHODS: A serial cross-sectional study of immediate breast reconstruction trends was performed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 1998 to 2008. Data on mastectomies, reconstructive method (autologous/implant), and sociodemographic/hospital predictors were obtained.
RESULTS: Immediate breast reconstruction rates increased on average 5 percent per year, from 20.8 percent to 37.8 percent (p < 0.01). Autologous reconstruction rates were unchanged. Implant use increased by an average of 11 percent per year (p < 0.01), surpassing autologous methods as the leading reconstructive modality after 2002. The strongest predictors of implant use were procedures performed after 2002, bilateral mastectomies, patients operated on in Midwest/West regions, and Medicare recipients. In contrast to bilateral mastectomies, which increased by 17 percent per year (p < 0.01), unilateral mastectomies decreased by 2 percent per year (p < 0.01). Bilateral mastectomy defects had significantly higher reconstruction rates than unilateral counterparts (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The significant rise in immediate reconstruction rates in the United States correlates closely to a 203 percent expansion in implant use. Although the reason for the increase in implant use is multifactorial, changes in mastectomy patterns, such as increased use of bilateral mastectomies, are one important contributor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23271515     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729cde

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  203 in total

1.  Elective Revisions after Breast Reconstruction: Results from the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; Sophocles H Voineskos; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Paravertebral Blocks Reduce Narcotic Use Without Affecting Perfusion in Patients Undergoing Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Odom; Nili Mehta; Rajiv P Parikh; Ryan Guffey; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Evolution and update on current devices for prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Kristina O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

Review 4.  Current strategies with 2-staged prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Christin Harless; Steven R Jacobson
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

5.  Visualized pre- and subpectoral implant placement for immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Diana L Dyrberg; Camilla Bille; Gudjon L Gunnarsson; Jens A Sørensen; Jørn B Thomsen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-10

6.  Immediate Reconstruction of the Radiated Breast: Recent Trends Contrary to Traditional Standards.

Authors:  Shailesh Agarwal; Kelley M Kidwell; Aaron Farberg; Jeffrey H Kozlow; Kevin C Chung; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Met and Unmet Expectations for Breast Reconstruction in Early Posttreatment Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Laurie E Steffen; Aimee Johnson; Beverly J Levine; Deborah K Mayer; Nancy E Avis
Journal:  Plast Surg Nurs       Date:  2017 Oct/Dec

8.  Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Jing Jiang; Adeyiza O Momoh; Amy Alderman; Sharon H Giordano; Thomas A Buchholz; Steven J Kronowitz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Remodeling Characteristics and Collagen Distributions of Biologic Scaffold Materials Biopsied From Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Sites.

Authors:  Jaime A Cavallo; Noopur Gangopadhyay; Jason Dudas; Andres A Roma; Mateusz S Jasielec; Jack Baty; Sara Baalman; Margaret M Frisella; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn; Brent D Matthews; Corey R Deeken
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.539

10.  Acellular dermal matrix reduces capsule formation in two-stage breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Karan Chopra; Bryan Buckingham; Jamil Matthews; Jennifer Sabino; Kashyap K Tadisina; Ronald P Silverman; Nelson H Goldberg; Sheri Slezak; Devinder P Singh
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.