Literature DB >> 26724173

Chest wall thickness and decompression failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anatomic locations in needle thoracostomy.

Danuel V Laan1, Trang Diem N Vu2, Cornelius A Thiels3, T K Pandian4, Henry J Schiller5, M Hassan Murad6, Johnathon M Aho7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Current Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines recommend decompression for thoracic tension physiology using a 5-cm angiocatheter at the second intercostal space (ICS) on the midclavicular line (MCL). High failure rates occur. Through systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to determine the chest wall thickness (CWT) of the 2nd ICS-MCL, the 4th/5th ICS at the anterior axillary line (AAL), the 4th/5th ICS mid axillary line (MAL) and needle thoracostomy failure rates using the currently recommended 5-cm angiocatheter.
METHODS: A comprehensive search of several databases from their inception to July 24, 2014 was conducted. The search was limited to the English language, and all study populations were included. Studies were appraised by two independent reviewers according to a priori defined PRISMA inclusion and exclusion criteria. Continuous outcomes (CWT) were evaluated using weighted mean difference and binary outcomes (failure with 5-cm needle) were assessed using incidence rate. Outcomes were pooled using the random-effects model.
RESULTS: The search resulted in 34,652 studies of which 15 were included for CWT analysis, 13 for NT effectiveness. Mean CWT was 42.79 mm (95% CI, 38.78-46.81) at 2nd ICS-MCL, 39.85 mm (95% CI, 28.70-51.00) at MAL, and 34.33 mm (95% CI, 28.20-40.47) at AAL (P=.08). Mean failure rate was 38% (95% CI, 24-54) at 2nd ICS-MCL, 31% (95% CI, 10-64) at MAL, and 13% (95% CI, 8-22) at AAL (P=.01).
CONCLUSION: Evidence from observational studies suggests that the 4th/5th ICS-AAL has the lowest predicted failure rate of needle decompression in multiple populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3 SR/MA with up to two negative criteria. STUDY TYPE: Therapeutic.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Needle decompression; Needle decompression location; Needle thoracostomy; Optimal positioning; Tension pneumothorax

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26724173      PMCID: PMC4976926          DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  23 in total

1.  Life threatening haemorrhage after anterior needle aspiration of pneumothoraces. A role for lateral needle aspiration in emergency decompression of spontaneous pneumothorax.

Authors:  R Rawlins; K M Brown; C S Carr; C R Cameron
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Radiologic assessment of potential sites for needle decompression of a tension pneumothorax.

Authors:  David B Wax; Andrew B Leibowitz
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Chest wall thickness in military personnel: implications for needle thoracentesis in tension pneumothorax.

Authors:  H Theodore Harcke; Lisa A Pearse; Angela D Levy; John M Getz; Stephen R Robinson
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  Needle thoracostomy for tension pneumothorax: failure predicted by chest computed tomography.

Authors:  Robert L Stevens; Angel A Rochester; Jonathan Busko; Thomas Blackwell; Daniel Schwartz; Anne Argenta; Ronald F Sing
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.077

5.  Needle thoracocentesis in tension pneumothorax: insufficient cannula length and potential failure.

Authors:  S Britten; S H Palmer; T M Snow
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Sufficient catheter length for pneumothorax needle decompression: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brian M Clemency; Christopher T Tanski; Michael Rosenberg; Paul R May; Joseph D Consiglio; Heather A Lindstrom
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.040

7.  Measure of chest wall thickness in French soldiers: which technique to use for needle decompression of tension pneumothorax at the front?

Authors:  Antoine Lamblin; Jean Turc; Olivier Bylicki; Damien Lohéas; Jean-Yves Martinez; Clément Derkenne; Pierre-François Wey; Pascal Précloux
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Needle thoracostomy: implications of computed tomography chest wall thickness.

Authors:  Melissa L Givens; Karen Ayotte; Craig Manifold
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Determination of the appropriate catheter length and place for needle thoracostomy by using computed tomography scans of pneumothorax patients.

Authors:  Haldun Akoglu; Ebru Unal Akoglu; Serdar Evman; Tayfun Akoglu; Arzu Denizbasi Altinok; Ozlem Guneysel; Ozge Ecmel Onur; Serkan Emre Eroglu
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Needle thoracostomy in the treatment of a tension pneumothorax in trauma patients: what size needle?

Authors:  Imme Zengerink; Peter R Brink; Kevin B Laupland; Earl L Raber; Dave Zygun; John B Kortbeek
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-01
View more
  10 in total

1.  Needle Decompression of Tension Pneumothorax with Colorimetric Capnography.

Authors:  Nimesh D Naik; Matthew C Hernandez; Jeff R Anderson; Erika K Ross; Martin D Zielinski; Johnathon M Aho
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Visually guided tube thoracostomy insertion comparison to standard of care in a large animal model.

Authors:  Matthew C Hernandez; David Vogelsang; Jeff R Anderson; Cornelius A Thiels; Gregory Beilman; Martin D Zielinski; Johnathon M Aho
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Determining optimal needle size for decompression of tension pneumothorax in children - a CT-based study.

Authors:  Georg Leonhard; Daniel Overhoff; Lucas Wessel; Tim Viergutz; Marcus Rudolph; Michael Schöler; Holger Haubenreisser; Tom Terboven
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  A novel optical technology based on 690 nm and 850 nm wavelengths to assist needle thoracostomy.

Authors:  Chien-Ching Lee; Chia-Chun Chuang; Chin-Li Lu; Bo-Cheng Lai; Edmund Cheung So; Bor-Shyh Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Emergent needle thoracostomy in prehospital trauma patients: a review of procedural execution through computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Michael M Neeki; Christina Cheung; Fanglong Dong; Nam Pham; Dylan Shafer; Arianna Neeki; Keeyon Hajjafar; Rodney Borger; Brandon Woodward; Louis Tran
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2021-08-27

6.  Paramedic Understanding of Tension Pneumothorax and Needle Thoracostomy (NT) Site Selection.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Lubin; Joshua Knapp; Maude L Kettenmann
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-19

Review 7.  [Cardiac arrest under special circumstances].

Authors:  Carsten Lott; Anatolij Truhlář; Anette Alfonzo; Alessandro Barelli; Violeta González-Salvado; Jochen Hinkelbein; Jerry P Nolan; Peter Paal; Gavin D Perkins; Karl-Christian Thies; Joyce Yeung; David A Zideman; Jasmeet Soar
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 0.826

8.  Evaluation of the position of the needle tip during thoracentesis: Experimental study.

Authors:  Masafumi Shimoda; Kozo Morimoto; Yoshiaki Tanaka; Kozo Yoshimori; Ken Ohta
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Chinese expert consensus on echelons treatment of thoracic injury in modern warfare.

Authors:  Zhao-Wen Zong; Zhi-Nong Wang; Si-Xu Chen; Hao Qin; Lian-Yang Zhang; Yue Shen; Lei Yang; Wen-Qiong Du; Can Chen; Xin Zhong; Lin Zhang; Jiang-Tao Huo; Li-Ping Kuai; Li-Xin Shu; Guo-Fu Du; Yu-Feng Zhao
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2018-10-04

10.  Risk Values of Weight and Body Mass Index for Chest Wall Thickness in Patients Requiring Needle Thoracostomy Decompression.

Authors:  Chia-Hung Hsu; Tzu-Yin Lin; Ju-Chi Ou; Jiann Ruey Ong; Hon-Ping Ma
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 1.112

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.