Literature DB >> 28238448

Visually guided tube thoracostomy insertion comparison to standard of care in a large animal model.

Matthew C Hernandez1, David Vogelsang2, Jeff R Anderson3, Cornelius A Thiels4, Gregory Beilman5, Martin D Zielinski6, Johnathon M Aho7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tube thoracostomy (TT) is a lifesaving procedure for a variety of thoracic pathologies. The most commonly utilized method for placement involves open dissection and blind insertion. Image guided placement is commonly utilized but is limited by an inability to see distal placement location. Unfortunately, TT is not without complications. We aim to demonstrate the feasibility of a disposable device to allow for visually directed TT placement compared to the standard of care in a large animal model.
METHODS: Three swine were sequentially orotracheally intubated and anesthetized. TT was conducted utilizing a novel visualization device, tube thoracostomy visual trocar (TTVT) and standard of care (open technique). Position of the TT in the chest cavity were recorded using direct thoracoscopic inspection and radiographic imaging with the operator blinded to results. Complications were evaluated using a validated complication grading system. Standard descriptive statistical analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Thirty TT were placed, 15 using TTVT technique, 15 using standard of care open technique. All of the TT placed using TTVT were without complication and in optimal position. Conversely, 27% of TT placed using standard of care open technique resulted in complications. Necropsy revealed no injury to intrathoracic organs.
CONCLUSION: Visual directed TT placement using TTVT is feasible and non-inferior to the standard of care in a large animal model. This improvement in instrumentation has the potential to greatly improve the safety of TT. Further study in humans is required. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chest tube; Trauma; Tube thoracostomy; Visual guidance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28238448      PMCID: PMC5427288          DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  21 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound-guided catheterization of the radial artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ariel L Shiloh; Richard H Savel; Laura M Paulin; Lewis A Eisen
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Chest wall thickness and decompression failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anatomic locations in needle thoracostomy.

Authors:  Danuel V Laan; Trang Diem N Vu; Cornelius A Thiels; T K Pandian; Henry J Schiller; M Hassan Murad; Johnathon M Aho
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-12-13       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 3.  Tube Thoracostomy: A Structured Review of Case Reports and a Standardized Format for Reporting Complications.

Authors:  Johnathon M Aho; Raaj K Ruparel; Phillip G Rowse; Rushin D Brahmbhatt; Donald Jenkins; Mariela Rivera
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  A technique for visual confirmation of intrathoracic placement of tube thoracostomy using a fiberoptic laryngoscope in a cadaver.

Authors:  J M Aho; R K Ruparel; H J Schiller
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Diagnosis of malpositioned chest tubes after emergency tube thoracostomy: is computed tomography more accurate than chest radiograph?

Authors:  Kun-Eng Lim; Shy-Chang Tai; Chang-Yi Chan; Yuan-Yu Hsu; Wen-Chang Hsu; Being-Chann Lin; Keong-Tiong Lee
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.605

6.  An audit of the complications of intercostal chest drain insertion in a high volume trauma service in South Africa.

Authors:  V Y Kong; G V Oosthuizen; B Sartorius; C Keene; D L Clarke
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Complications of tube thoracostomy placement in the emergency department.

Authors:  Kinjal N Sethuraman; David Duong; Supriya Mehta; Tara Director; Darcey Crawford; Jill St George; Niels K Rathlev
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  Tube thoracostomy: Increased angle of insertion is associated with complications.

Authors:  Matthew C Hernandez; Danuel V Laan; Stacey L Zimmerman; Nimesh D Naik; Henry J Schiller; Johnathon M Aho
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.313

9.  The spectrum of visceral injuries secondary to misplaced intercostal chest drains: experience from a high volume trauma service in South Africa.

Authors:  Victor Y Kong; Damian L Clarke
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Ultrasound guidance versus the landmark technique for the placement of central venous catheters in the emergency department.

Authors:  Adam H Miller; Brett A Roth; Trevor J Mills; Jay R Woody; Charles E Longmoor; Barbara Foster
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.451

View more
  2 in total

1.  Tube Thoracostomy Complications: More to Learn: Reply.

Authors:  Matthew C Hernandez; Martin D Zielinski; Johnathon M Aho
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  External Validation of a Tube Thoracostomy Complication Classification System.

Authors:  Yoginee Sritharen; Matthew C Hernandez; Nadeem N Haddad; Victor Kong; Damian Clarke; Martin D Zielinski; Johnathon M Aho
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.352

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.