Literature DB >> 17028868

The Oxford phase III unicompartmental knee replacement in patients less than 60 years of age.

Nanne P Kort1, Jos J A M van Raay, Jim J van Horn.   

Abstract

Treatment of younger patients with medial unicompartmental disease of the knee joint remains a challenging therapeutic dilemma. With the refinement of implant design, fixation and the minimally invasive techniques employed with unicompartmental knee replacement, indications have expanded to include its use in young patients. A prospective cohort of 46 unicompartmental knee procedures were performed with a 2-year minimum and 6-year maximum follow-up, using the Oxford phase III unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, in the younger patient group (age 60 or younger). We conclude that the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is an important option for the treatment of medial compartment disease for patients 60 years or younger. Obesity can cause technical difficulties, increased risk of complications and early failure of this prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17028868     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0204-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  29 in total

1.  Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series.

Authors:  U C Svärd; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

2.  Does body weight influence outcome after total knee arthroplasty? A 1-year analysis.

Authors:  R G Deshmukh; J H Hayes; I M Pinder
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  Surgical options for the middle-aged patient with osteoarthritis of the knee joint.

Authors:  A D Hanssen; M J Stuart; R D Scott; G R Scuderi
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2001

4.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term success in middle-age and obese patients.

Authors:  Owen B Tabor; Owen B Tabor; Matthew Bernard; Jim Y Wan
Journal:  J Surg Orthop Adv       Date:  2005

Review 5.  Mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  David W Murray
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 6.  Surgical treatment. Osteotomy and unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  R W Jackson
Journal:  Am J Knee Surg       Date:  1998

7.  Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation.

Authors:  S Ahlbäck
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1968

8.  The radiolucent line beneath the tibial components of the Oxford meniscal knee.

Authors:  S B Tibrewal; K A Grant; J W Goodfellow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1984-08

9.  Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Thomas H Mallory; Joanne B Adams; Kari L Groseth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Mini-invasive knee unicompartmental arthroplasty: bone-sparing technique.

Authors:  John A Repicci
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2003
View more
  20 in total

1.  Overstuffed medial compartment after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Kerens; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Survival analysis and functional outcome of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement up to 11 years follow up at a District General Hospital.

Authors:  M Edmondson; A Atrey; D East; N Ellens; K Miles; R Goddard; H Apthorp; A Butler-Manuel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-05-18

3.  The immediate effect of navigation on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ralf E Rosenberger; Christian Fink; Sebastian Quirbach; Rene Attal; Katja Tecklenburg; Christian Hoser
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  No radiographic difference between patient-specific guiding and conventional Oxford UKA surgery.

Authors:  Bart Kerens; Martijn G M Schotanus; Bert Boonen; Nanne P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients aged less than 65.

Authors:  Annette W-Dahl; Otto Robertsson; Lars Lidgren; Lisa Miller; David Davidson; Stephen Graves
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Minimum thickness of all-poly tibial component unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years does not increase revision rate for aseptic loosening.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Ibrahim Akkawi; Francesco Iacono; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Michele Gagliardi; Marco Nitri; Alberto Grassi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Simone Bignozzi; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review of literature.

Authors:  Bernardino Saccomanni
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Promising short-term clinical results of the cementless Oxford phase III medial unicondylar knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Karin B van Dorp; Stefan Jm Breugem; Daniël J Bruijn; Marcel Jm Driessen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-04-18

10.  Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in young patients.

Authors:  Marcus R Streit; Julia Streit; Tilman Walker; Thomas Bruckner; J Philippe Kretzer; Volker Ewerbeck; Christian Merle; Peter R Aldinger; Tobias Gotterbarm
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.