Literature DB >> 33984171

Review of Evidence-Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction.

Nicole Carlson1, Jessica Ellis2, Katie Page3, Alexis Dunn Amore1, Julia Phillippi4.   

Abstract

Induction of labor is increasingly a common component of the intrapartum care. Knowledge of the current evidence on methods of labor induction is an essential component of shared decision-making to determine which induction method meets an individual's health needs and personal preferences. This article provides a review of the current research evidence on labor induction methods, including cervical ripening techniques, and contraction stimulation techniques. Current evidence about expected duration of labor following induction, use of the Bishop score to guide induction, and guidance on the use of combination methods for labor induction are reviewed.
© 2021 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  first stage of labor; intrapartum care, induction, amniotomy, transcervical catheter, oxytocin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33984171      PMCID: PMC8363560          DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.891


  67 in total

1.  Trends in maternal morbidity before and during pregnancy in California.

Authors:  Moshe Fridman; Lisa M Korst; Jessica Chow; Elizabeth Lawton; Connie Mitchell; Kimberly D Gregory
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  ACOG Committee Opinion No 579: Definition of term pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Misoprostol combined with cervical single or double balloon catheters versus misoprostol alone for labor induction of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Lía Ornat; Vanesa Alonso-Ventura; Juan Bueno-Notivol; Peter Chedraui; Faustino R Pérez-López
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2019-02-10

4.  Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Katheryne L Downes; Michal A Elovitz; Samuel Parry; Mary D Sammel; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Discontinuation of intravenous oxytocin in the active phase of induced labour.

Authors:  Sidsel Boie; Julie Glavind; Adeline V Velu; Ben Willem J Mol; Niels Uldbjerg; Irene de Graaf; Jim G Thornton; Pinar Bor; Jannet Jh Bakker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-20

Review 6.  Current pharmacotherapy options for labor induction.

Authors:  J Seth Hawkins; Deborah A Wing
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.889

7.  Oxytocin augmentation of dysfunctional labor. IV. Oxytocin pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J Seitchik; J Amico; A G Robinson; M Castillo
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-10-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Hospital-Level Variation in the Frequency of Cesarean Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Who Undergo Labor Induction.

Authors:  Elliott K Main; Shen-Chih Chang; Yvonne W Cheng; Melissa G Rosenstein; David C Lagrew
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  High-dose compared with low-dose oxytocin for induction of labour of nulliparous women at term.

Authors:  Natasha Prichard; Anthea Lindquist; Richard Hiscock; Sophie Ruff; Stephen Tong; Fiona C Brownfoot
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-09-26

10.  Maternal obesity and labour complications following induction of labour in prolonged pregnancy.

Authors:  S Arrowsmith; S Wray; S Quenby
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 6.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.