Literature DB >> 15547534

A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening.

Roni Levy1, Bibi Kanengiser, Boris Furman, Alon Ben Arie, Dov Brown, Zion J Hagay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of cervical ripening with 2 Foley catheter balloon volumes. STUDY
DESIGN: Pregnant women admitted for induction of labor with a term singleton gestation were randomly assigned for cervical ripening by a balloon inflated with 30 mL or 80 mL of sterile saline.
RESULTS: Two hundred and three women were included in the analysis. Ripening of the cervix with the larger balloon volume was associated with a significantly higher rate of post-ripening dilatation of 3 cm or more (76.0% vs 52.4%, P < .001). In primiparous women, the larger balloon volume resulted in a significantly higher rate of deliveries by 24 hours (71.4% vs 49%, P < .05), and a significantly less requirement of augmentation with oxytocin (69.3% vs 90.4%, P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Ripening of the unfavorable cervix in primiparous women with a Foley catheter balloon inflated with 80 mL provided effective more dilatation, faster labor, and decreased need for oxytocin than with a balloon inflated with 30 mL of sterile saline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15547534     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  10 in total

1.  Labor induction utilizing the Foley balloon: a randomized trial comparing standard placement versus immediate removal.

Authors:  K J Sharma; B H Grubbs; P M Mullin; N Opper; R H Lee
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 2.  The Renaissance of Transcervical Balloon Catheters for Cervical Ripening and Labour Induction.

Authors:  W Rath; S Kehl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Cervical ripening with the balloon catheter and the risk of subsequent preterm birth.

Authors:  N Zafran; G Garmi; S Zuarez-Easton; Z Nachum; R Salim
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Hygroscopic dilators vs balloon catheter ripening of the cervix for induction of labor in nulliparous women at term: Retrospective study.

Authors:  Ryosuke Shindo; Shigeru Aoki; Naohiro Yonemoto; Yuriko Yamamoto; Junko Kasai; Michi Kasai; Etsuko Miyagi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lixia Zhu; Cong Zhang; Fang Cao; Qin Liu; Xing Gu; Jianhao Xu; Jianqing Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiyao Liu; Yu Wang; Fan Zhang; Xiaoni Zhong; Rong Ou; Xin Luo; Hongbo Qi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 7.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18

8.  Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor at Term: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ning Gu; Tong Ru; Zhiqun Wang; Yimin Dai; Mingming Zheng; Biyun Xu; Yali Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of vaginal misoprostol with foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor.

Authors:  Fatemeh Vahid Roudsari; Sedigheh Ayati; Marzieh Ghasemi; Maliheh Hasanzadeh Mofrad; Mohamad Taghi Shakeri; Farnoush Farshidi; Masoud Shahabian
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.696

10.  Double balloon catheters: A promising tool for induction of labor in multiparous women with unfavorable cervices

Authors:  Fırat Tülek; Ali Gemici; Feride Söylemez
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2018-09-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.