Literature DB >> 26719371

The Extended ToxTracker Assay Discriminates Between Induction of DNA Damage, Oxidative Stress, and Protein Misfolding.

Giel Hendriks1, Remco S Derr2, Branislav Misovic2, Bruno Morolli2, Fabienne M G R Calléja2, Harry Vrieling2.   

Abstract

Chemical exposure of cells may damage biomolecules, cellular structures, and organelles thereby jeopardizing cellular homeostasis. A multitude of defense mechanisms have evolved that can recognize specific types of damaged molecules and will initiate distinct cellular programs aiming to remove the damage inflicted and prevent cellular havoc. As a consequence, quantitative assessment of the activity of the cellular stress responses may serve as a sensitive reporter for the induction of specific types of damage. We have previously developed the ToxTracker assay, a mammalian stem cell-based genotoxicity assay employing two green fluorescent protein reporters specific for DNA damage and oxidative stress. We have now expanded the ToxTracker assay with an additional four reporter cell lines to include monitoring of additional stress signaling pathways. This panel of six green fluorescent protein reporters is able to discriminate between different primary reactivity of chemicals being their ability to react with DNA and block DNA replication, induce oxidative stress, activate the unfolded protein response, or cause a general P53-dependent cellular stress response. Extensive validation using the compound library suggested by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) and a large panel of reference chemicals shows that the ToxTracker assay has an outstanding sensitivity and specificity. In addition, we developed Toxplot, a dedicated software tool for automated data analysis and graphical representation of the test results. Rapid and reliable identification by the ToxTracker assay of specific biological reactivity can significantly improve in vitro human hazard assessment of chemicals.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage response; genotoxicity; mechanisms of toxicity; oxidative stress; reporter cell lines

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26719371      PMCID: PMC5009621          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  63 in total

1.  Validation of high-throughput genotoxicity assay screening using γH2AX in-cell western assay on HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Laure Khoury; Daniel Zalko; Marc Audebert
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 2.  Physiological roles of Rho and Rho effectors in mammals.

Authors:  Dean Thumkeo; Sadanori Watanabe; Shuh Narumiya
Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Genotoxicity and endoreduplication inducing activity of the food flavouring eugenol.

Authors:  Alexandra Maralhas; Ana Monteiro; Célia Martins; Michel Kranendonk; António Laires; José Rueff; António S Rodrigues
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 4.  The role of cytochrome P450 enzymes in endogenous signalling pathways and environmental carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Daniel W Nebert; Timothy P Dalton
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Growth arrest and DNA damage-45 alpha (GADD45alpha).

Authors:  A Rosemary Siafakas; Des R Richardson
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 5.085

6.  The lipodystrophy protein seipin is found at endoplasmic reticulum lipid droplet junctions and is important for droplet morphology.

Authors:  Kimberly M Szymanski; Derk Binns; René Bartz; Nick V Grishin; Wei-Ping Li; Anil K Agarwal; Abhimanyu Garg; Richard G W Anderson; Joel M Goodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  An overview of transcriptional regulation in response to toxicological insult.

Authors:  Paul Jennings; Alice Limonciel; Luca Felice; Martin O Leonard
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 8.  The mammalian anti-proliferative BTG/Tob protein family.

Authors:  G Sebastiaan Winkler
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.384

9.  Development of a high-throughput Gaussia luciferase reporter assay for the activation of the GADD45a gene by mutagens, promutagens, clastogens, and aneugens.

Authors:  Chris Hughes; Adam Rabinowitz; Matthew Tate; Louise Birrell; Jodie Allsup; Nicholas Billinton; Richard M Walmsley
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2012-07-10

Review 10.  Replication stress and cancer: it takes two to tango.

Authors:  Emilio Lecona; Oscar Fernández-Capetillo
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.905

View more
  20 in total

1.  In vivo measurements of interindividual differences in DNA glycosylases and APE1 activities.

Authors:  Isaac A Chaim; Zachary D Nagel; Jennifer J Jordan; Patrizia Mazzucato; Le P Ngo; Leona D Samson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Dynamically monitoring cellular γ-H2AX reveals the potential of carcinogenicity evaluation for genotoxic compounds.

Authors:  Minmin Qu; Hua Xu; Wuju Li; Jia Chen; Yajiao Zhang; Bin Xu; Zhi Li; Tao Liu; Lei Guo; Jianwei Xie
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  In Silico Approaches In Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Current Status and Future Needs.

Authors:  Raymond R Tice; Arianna Bassan; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Marc A Beal; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Jeffrey Birmingham; Alessandro Brigo; Frank Bringezu; Lidia Ceriani; Ian Crooks; Kevin Cross; Rosalie Elespuru; David M Faulkner; Marie C Fortin; Paul Fowler; Markus Frericks; Helga H J Gerets; Gloria D Jahnke; David R Jones; Naomi L Kruhlak; Elena Lo Piparo; Juan Lopez-Belmonte; Amarjit Luniwal; Alice Luu; Federica Madia; Serena Manganelli; Balasubramanian Manickam; Jordi Mestres; Amy L Mihalchik-Burhans; Louise Neilson; Arun Pandiri; Manuela Pavan; Cynthia V Rider; John P Rooney; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Karen H Watanabe-Sailor; Angela T White; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-23

Review 4.  Emerging metrology for high-throughput nanomaterial genotoxicology.

Authors:  Bryant C Nelson; Christa W Wright; Yuko Ibuki; Maria Moreno-Villanueva; Hanna L Karlsson; Giel Hendriks; Christopher M Sims; Neenu Singh; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Integration of data across toxicity endpoints for improved safety assessment of chemicals: the example of carcinogenicity assessment.

Authors:  Federica Madia; Gelsomina Pillo; Andrew Worth; Raffaella Corvi; Pilar Prieto
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  The in vitro ToxTracker and Aneugen Clastogen Evaluation extension assay as a tool in the assessment of relative genotoxic potential of e-liquids and their aerosols.

Authors:  Lukasz Czekala; Fiona Chapman; Liam Simms; Kathryn Rudd; Edgar Trelles Sticken; Roman Wieczorek; Lisa Maria Bode; Jutta Pani; Nynke Moelijker; Remco Derr; Inger Brandsma; Giel Hendriks; Matthew Stevenson; Tanvir Walele
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Moving forward in carcinogenicity assessment: Report of an EURL ECVAM/ESTIV workshop.

Authors:  Raffaella Corvi; Federica Madia; Kathryn Z Guyton; Peter Kasper; Ruthann Rudel; Annamaria Colacci; Jos Kleinjans; Paul Jennings
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Chemical carcinogen safety testing: OECD expert group international consensus on the development of an integrated approach for the testing and assessment of chemical non-genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Miriam N Jacobs; Annamaria Colacci; Raffaella Corvi; Monica Vaccari; M Cecilia Aguila; Marco Corvaro; Nathalie Delrue; Daniel Desaulniers; Norman Ertych; Abigail Jacobs; Mirjam Luijten; Federica Madia; Akiyoshi Nishikawa; Kumiko Ogawa; Kiyomi Ohmori; Martin Paparella; Anoop Kumar Sharma; Paule Vasseur
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  A Next-Generation Risk Assessment Case Study for Coumarin in Cosmetic Products.

Authors:  Maria T Baltazar; Sophie Cable; Paul L Carmichael; Richard Cubberley; Tom Cull; Mona Delagrange; Matthew P Dent; Sarah Hatherell; Jade Houghton; Predrag Kukic; Hequn Li; Mi-Young Lee; Sophie Malcomber; Alistair M Middleton; Thomas E Moxon; Alexis V Nathanail; Beate Nicol; Ruth Pendlington; Georgia Reynolds; Joe Reynolds; Andrew White; Carl Westmoreland
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Genotoxic and mutagenic properties of Ni and NiO nanoparticles investigated by comet assay, γ-H2AX staining, Hprt mutation assay and ToxTracker reporter cell lines.

Authors:  Emma Åkerlund; Francesca Cappellini; Sebastiano Di Bucchianico; Shafiqul Islam; Sara Skoglund; Remco Derr; Inger Odnevall Wallinder; Giel Hendriks; Hanna L Karlsson
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.