Literature DB >> 34510228

Dynamically monitoring cellular γ-H2AX reveals the potential of carcinogenicity evaluation for genotoxic compounds.

Minmin Qu1, Hua Xu2, Wuju Li3, Jia Chen1, Yajiao Zhang1, Bin Xu1, Zhi Li1, Tao Liu3, Lei Guo1, Jianwei Xie4.   

Abstract

Amongst all toxicological endpoints, carcinogenicity might pose the greatest concern. Genetic damage has been considered an important underlying mechanism for the carcinogenicity of chemical substances. The demand for in vitro genotoxic tests as alternative approaches is growing rapidly with the implementation of new regulations for compounds. However, currently available in vitro genotoxicity tests are often limited by relatively high false positive rates. Moreover, few studies have explored carcinogenicity potential by in vitro genotoxicity testing due to the shortage of suitable toxicological biomarkers to link gene damage with cancer risk. γ-H2AX is a recently acknowledged attractive endpoint (biomarker) for evaluating DNA damage and can simultaneously reflect the DNA damage response and repair of cells. We previously reported an ultrasensitive and reliable method, namely stable-isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS), for detecting cellular γ-H2AX and evaluating genotoxic chemicals. More importantly, our method can dynamically monitor the specific processes of genotoxic compounds affecting DNA damage and repair reflected by the amount of γ-H2AX. To clarify the possibility of using this method to assess the potential carcinogenicity of genotoxic chemicals, we applied it to a set of 69 model compounds recommended by the European Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM), with already-characterized genotoxic potential. Compared to conventional in vitro genotoxicity assays, including the Ames test, the γ-H2AX assay by MS has high accuracy (94-96%) due to high sensitivity and specificity (88% and 100%, respectively). The dynamic profiles of model compounds after exposure in HepG2 cells were explored, and a mathematical approach was employed to simulate and quantitatively model the DNA repair kinetics of genotoxic carcinogens (GCs) based on γ-H2AX time-effect curves up to 8 h. Two crucial parameters, i.e., k (rate of γ-H2AX decay) and t50 (time required for γ-H2AX from maximum decrease to half) estimated by the least squares method, were achieved. An open web server to help researchers calculate these two key parameters and profile simulated curves of the tested compound is available online ( http://ccb1.bmi.ac.cn:81/shiny-server/sample-apps/prediction1/ ). We detected a positive association between carcinogenic levels and k and t50 values of γ-H2AX in tested GCs, validating the potential of using this MS-based γ-H2AX in vitro assay to help preliminarily evaluate carcinogenicity and assess genotoxicity. This approach may be used alone or integrated into an existing battery of in vitro genetic toxicity tests.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carcinogenicity; Genotoxic carcinogens; Genotoxicity; Mass spectrometry; γ-H2AX

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34510228     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-021-03156-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  36 in total

Review 1.  The hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  D Hanahan; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-01-07       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Aneuploidy: a report of an ECETOC task force.

Authors:  M J Aardema; S Albertini; P Arni; L M Henderson; M Kirsch-Volders; J M Mackay; A M Sarrif; D A Stringer; R D Taalman
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  GADD45a-GFP GreenScreen HC assay results for the ECVAM recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of new genotoxicity tests.

Authors:  Louise Birrell; Paul Cahill; Chris Hughes; Matthew Tate; Richard M Walmsley
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  The Extended ToxTracker Assay Discriminates Between Induction of DNA Damage, Oxidative Stress, and Protein Misfolding.

Authors:  Giel Hendriks; Remco S Derr; Branislav Misovic; Bruno Morolli; Fabienne M G R Calléja; Harry Vrieling
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  Consideration of both genotoxic and nongenotoxic mechanisms in predicting carcinogenic potential.

Authors:  B E Butterworth
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Use of the γH2AX assay for assessing the genotoxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in human cell lines.

Authors:  M Audebert; A Riu; C Jacques; A Hillenweck; E L Jamin; D Zalko; J-P Cravedi
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 7.  Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance.

Authors:  L Galluzzi; L Senovilla; I Vitale; J Michels; I Martins; O Kepp; M Castedo; G Kroemer
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Phase I and II enzyme characterization of two sources of HepG2 cell lines.

Authors:  N J Hewitt; P Hewitt
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.908

9.  Development of a high-throughput Gaussia luciferase reporter assay for the activation of the GADD45a gene by mutagens, promutagens, clastogens, and aneugens.

Authors:  Chris Hughes; Adam Rabinowitz; Matthew Tate; Louise Birrell; Jodie Allsup; Nicholas Billinton; Richard M Walmsley
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2012-07-10

Review 10.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.