Literature DB >> 27565834

Emerging metrology for high-throughput nanomaterial genotoxicology.

Bryant C Nelson1, Christa W Wright2, Yuko Ibuki3, Maria Moreno-Villanueva4, Hanna L Karlsson5, Giel Hendriks6, Christopher M Sims7, Neenu Singh8, Shareen H Doak9.   

Abstract

The rapid development of the engineered nanomaterial (ENM) manufacturing industry has accelerated the incorporation of ENMs into a wide variety of consumer products across the globe. Unintentionally or not, some of these ENMs may be introduced into the environment or come into contact with humans or other organisms resulting in unexpected biological effects. It is thus prudent to have rapid and robust analytical metrology in place that can be used to critically assess and/or predict the cytotoxicity, as well as the potential genotoxicity of these ENMs. Many of the traditional genotoxicity test methods [e.g. unscheduled DNA synthesis assay, bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test, etc.,] for determining the DNA damaging potential of chemical and biological compounds are not suitable for the evaluation of ENMs, due to a variety of methodological issues ranging from potential assay interferences to problems centered on low sample throughput. Recently, a number of sensitive, high-throughput genotoxicity assays/platforms (CometChip assay, flow cytometry/micronucleus assay, flow cytometry/γ-H2AX assay, automated 'Fluorimetric Detection of Alkaline DNA Unwinding' (FADU) assay, ToxTracker reporter assay) have been developed, based on substantial modifications and enhancements of traditional genotoxicity assays. These new assays have been used for the rapid measurement of DNA damage (strand breaks), chromosomal damage (micronuclei) and for detecting upregulated DNA damage signalling pathways resulting from ENM exposures. In this critical review, we describe and discuss the fundamental measurement principles and measurement endpoints of these new assays, as well as the modes of operation, analytical metrics and potential interferences, as applicable to ENM exposures. An unbiased discussion of the major technical advantages and limitations of each assay for evaluating and predicting the genotoxic potential of ENMs is also provided. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27565834      PMCID: PMC5500194          DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gew037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  155 in total

1.  Copper oxide nanoparticle mediated DNA damage in terrestrial plant models.

Authors:  Donald H Atha; Huanhua Wang; Elijah J Petersen; Danielle Cleveland; R David Holbrook; Pawel Jaruga; Miral Dizdaroglu; Baoshan Xing; Bryant C Nelson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  Implementation of alternative test strategies for the safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  A E Nel
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  A comparative performance test of standard, medium- and high-throughput comet assays.

Authors:  Amaya Azqueta; Kristine B Gutzkow; Catherine C Priestley; Silja Meier; Joanne S Walker; Gunnar Brunborg; Andrew R Collins
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual mammalian cells.

Authors:  O Ostling; K J Johanson
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1984-08-30       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Associations of subjective vitality with DNA damage, cardiovascular risk factors and physical performance.

Authors:  S Maynard; G Keijzers; A-M Hansen; M Osler; D Molbo; L Bendix; P Møller; S Loft; M Moreno-Villanueva; A Bürkle; C P Hvitby; S H Schurman; T Stevnsner; L J Rasmussen; K Avlund; V A Bohr
Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 6.311

6.  High-throughput screening platform for engineered nanoparticle-mediated genotoxicity using CometChip technology.

Authors:  Christa Watson; Jing Ge; Joel Cohen; Georgios Pyrgiotakis; Bevin P Engelward; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  Structural chromosome abnormalities, increased DNA strand breaks and DNA strand break repair deficiency in dermal fibroblasts from old female human donors.

Authors:  Faiza Kalfalah; Sabine Seggewiß; Regina Walter; Julia Tigges; María Moreno-Villanueva; Alexander Bürkle; Sebastian Ohse; Hauke Busch; Melanie Boerries; Barbara Hildebrandt; Brigitte Royer-Pokora; Fritz Boege
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.682

8.  An optimized method for detecting gamma-H2AX in blood cells reveals a significant interindividual variation in the gamma-H2AX response among humans.

Authors:  Ismail Hassan Ismail; Tabasum Imran Wadhra; Ola Hammarsten
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Predictive value of in vitro assays depends on the mechanism of toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Wan-Seob Cho; Rodger Duffin; Mark Bradley; Ian L Megson; William MacNee; Jong Kwon Lee; Jayoung Jeong; Ken Donaldson
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 10.  Emergence of micronuclei as a genomic biomarker.

Authors:  Robin Sabharwal; Parul Verma; Mohammed Asif Syed; Tamanna Sharma; Santosh Kumar Subudhi; Saumyakanta Mohanty; Shivangi Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Redox-active nanomaterials for nanomedicine applications.

Authors:  Christopher M Sims; Shannon K Hanna; Daniel A Heller; Christopher P Horoszko; Monique E Johnson; Antonio R Montoro Bustos; Vytas Reipa; Kathryn R Riley; Bryant C Nelson
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 7.790

Review 2.  Applications of CometChip for Environmental Health Studies.

Authors:  Christy Chao; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  The in vitro ToxTracker and Aneugen Clastogen Evaluation extension assay as a tool in the assessment of relative genotoxic potential of e-liquids and their aerosols.

Authors:  Lukasz Czekala; Fiona Chapman; Liam Simms; Kathryn Rudd; Edgar Trelles Sticken; Roman Wieczorek; Lisa Maria Bode; Jutta Pani; Nynke Moelijker; Remco Derr; Inger Brandsma; Giel Hendriks; Matthew Stevenson; Tanvir Walele
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 4.  Risk Assessment and Risk Minimization in Nanomedicine: A Need for Predictive, Alternative, and 3Rs Strategies.

Authors:  Lisa Accomasso; Caterina Cristallini; Claudia Giachino
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 5.  Advantages of evaluating γH2AX induction in non-clinical drug development.

Authors:  Shigeki Motoyama; Akira Takeiri; Kenji Tanaka; Asako Harada; Kaori Matsuzaki; Junko Taketo; Saori Matsuo; Etsuko Fujii; Masayuki Mishima
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2018-05-14

6.  ToxTracker Reporter Cell Lines as a Tool for Mechanism-Based (geno)Toxicity Screening of Nanoparticles-Metals, Oxides and Quantum Dots.

Authors:  Sarah McCarrick; Francesca Cappellini; Amanda Kessler; Nynke Moelijker; Remco Derr; Jonas Hedberg; Susanna Wold; Eva Blomberg; Inger Odnevall Wallinder; Giel Hendriks; Hanna L Karlsson
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 5.076

7.  Micronuclei Detection by Flow Cytometry as a High-Throughput Approach for the Genotoxicity Testing of Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Alba García-Rodríguez; Liliya Kazantseva; Laura Vila; Laura Rubio; Antonia Velázquez; María José Ramírez; Ricard Marcos; Alba Hernández
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 8.  The Hitchhiker's Guide to Human Therapeutic Nanoparticle Development.

Authors:  Thelvia I Ramos; Carlos A Villacis-Aguirre; Katherine V López-Aguilar; Leandro Santiago Padilla; Claudia Altamirano; Jorge R Toledo; Nelson Santiago Vispo
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.321

9.  Adverse Outcome Pathway Development for Assessment of Lung Carcinogenicity by Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Penny Nymark; Hanna L Karlsson; Sabina Halappanavar; Ulla Vogel
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2021-04-29

10.  Genotoxic and mutagenic properties of Ni and NiO nanoparticles investigated by comet assay, γ-H2AX staining, Hprt mutation assay and ToxTracker reporter cell lines.

Authors:  Emma Åkerlund; Francesca Cappellini; Sebastiano Di Bucchianico; Shafiqul Islam; Sara Skoglund; Remco Derr; Inger Odnevall Wallinder; Giel Hendriks; Hanna L Karlsson
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.