Literature DB >> 26718557

Effects of sensory augmentation on postural control and gait symmetry of transfemoral amputees: a case description.

Anna Pagel1,2, Alejandro Hernandez Arieta3, Robert Riener4,5, Heike Vallery4,6.   

Abstract

Despite recent advances in leg prosthetics, transfemoral amputees still experience limitations in postural control and gait symmetry. It has been hypothesized that artificial sensory information might improve the integration of the prosthesis into the human sensory-motor control loops and, thus, reduce these limitations. In three transfemoral amputees, we investigated the effect of Electrotactile Moving Sensation for Sensory Augmentation (EMSSA) without training and present preliminary findings. Experimental conditions included standing with open/closed eyes on stable/unstable ground as well as treadmill walking. For standing conditions, spatiotemporal posturographic measures and sample entropy were derived from the center of pressure. For walking conditions, step length and stance duration were calculated. Conditions without feedback showed effects congruent with findings in the literature, e.g., asymmetric weight bearing and step length, and validated the collected data. During standing, with EMSSA a tendency to influence postural control in a negative way was found: Postural control was less effective and less efficient and the prosthetic leg was less involved. Sample entropy tended to decrease, suggesting that EMSSA demanded increased attention. During walking, with EMSSA no persistent positive effect was found. This contrasts the positive subjective assessment and the positive effect on one subject's step length.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrotactile stimulation; Neural prosthesis; Postural control; Prosthetic limb; Sensory augmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26718557     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-015-1432-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  31 in total

1.  Antagonistic active knee prosthesis. A metabolic cost of walking comparison with a variable-damping prosthetic knee.

Authors:  Ernesto C Martinez-Villalpando; Luke Mooney; Grant Elliott; Hugh Herr
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

2.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems.

Authors:  K A Kaczmarek; J G Webster; P Bach-y-Rita; W J Tompkins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Balance control on a moving platform in unilateral lower limb amputees.

Authors:  A H Vrieling; H G van Keeken; T Schoppen; E Otten; A L Hof; J P K Halbertsma; K Postema
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Postural changes after sustained neck muscle contraction in persons with a lower leg amputation.

Authors:  Cyril Duclos; Régine Roll; Anne Kavounoudias; Jean-Philippe Mongeau; Jean-Pierre Roll; Robert Forget
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 2.368

5.  Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults.

Authors:  T E Prieto; J B Myklebust; R G Hoffmann; E G Lovett; B M Myklebust
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Stair ascent with an innovative microprocessor-controlled exoprosthetic knee joint.

Authors:  Malte Bellmann; Thomas Schmalz; Eva Ludwigs; Siegmar Blumentritt
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.411

7.  Utilization of a lower extremity ambulatory feedback system to reduce gait asymmetry in transtibial amputation gait.

Authors:  L Yang; P S Dyer; R J Carson; J B Webster; K Bo Foreman; S J M Bamberg
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Balance confidence among people with lower-limb amputations.

Authors:  William C Miller; Mark Speechley; A Barry Deathe
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-09

9.  Afferent sensory feedback for lower extremity prosthesis.

Authors:  F W Clippinger; A V Seaber; J H McElhaney; J M Harrelson; G M Maxwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Entropy of balance--some recent results.

Authors:  Frank G Borg; Gerd Laxåback
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  5 in total

1.  Resistance training using a novel robotic walker for over-ground gait rehabilitation: a preliminary study on healthy subjects.

Authors:  Kyung-Ryoul Mun; Brandon Bao Sheng Yeo; Zhao Guo; Soon Cheol Chung; Haoyong Yu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Questionnaire results of user experiences with wearable exoskeletons and their preferences for sensory feedback.

Authors:  Heidi Muijzer-Witteveen; Nienke Sibum; Rosanne van Dijsseldonk; Noël Keijsers; Edwin van Asseldonk
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Cognitive benefits of using non-invasive compared to implantable neural feedback.

Authors:  Lauren Chee; Giacomo Valle; Greta Preatoni; Chiara Basla; Michele Marazzi; Stanisa Raspopovic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Biofeedback Systems for Gait Rehabilitation of Individuals with Lower-Limb Amputation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rafael Escamilla-Nunez; Alexandria Michelini; Jan Andrysek
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  A Multimodal Sensory Apparatus for Robotic Prosthetic Feet Combining Optoelectronic Pressure Transducers and IMU.

Authors:  Tommaso Fiumalbi; Elena Martini; Vito Papapicco; Filippo Dell'Agnello; Alessandro Mazzarini; Andrea Baldoni; Emanuele Gruppioni; Simona Crea; Nicola Vitiello
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.