| Literature DB >> 26716017 |
Cosme Alvarado-Esquivel1, Luis Francisco Sánchez-Anguiano2, Jesús Hernández-Tinoco2, Emilio Arreola-Cháidez3, Juan López3, Karla Itzel Salcido-Meraz3, Sergio Estrada-Martínez2, José Antonio Navarrete-Flores2, Alma Rosa Pérez-Álamos2, Marcia Hernández-Ochoa3, Elizabeth Rábago-Sánchez4, Oliver Liesenfeld5.
Abstract
Through an age- and sex-matched case-control study, we sought to determine whether female sex workers have an increased risk of Toxoplasma gondii exposure and to determine the sociodemographic, work, clinical, and behavioral characteristics of these workers associated with T. gondii exposure. Female workers (n = 136) and controls (n = 272) were examined with enzyme-linked immunoassays (EIA) for the presence of anti-Toxoplasma IgG and IgM antibodies. IgM positive sera were additionally tested with enzyme linked-fluorescence immunoassay (ELFA). Anti-T. gondii IgG antibodies were found in 21 (15.44%) of 136 cases and in 10 (3.67%) of 272 controls (OR = 4.05; 95% CI: 1.84-8.89; P = 0.0001). Anti-T. gondii IgG levels higher than 150 IU/ml were found in 13 (9.6%) of 136 cases and in 8 (2.9%) of 272 controls (P = 0.007). Anti-T. gondii IgM antibodies were found in two cases and in six controls by EIA, but all were negative by ELFA. T. gondii seropositivity was associated with being born out of Durango State (OR = 10.47; 95% CI: 2.9-36.8; P < 0.01), injuries during sex work (OR = 6.30; 95% CI: 1.1-33.7; P = 0.03), and soil contact (OR = 4.11; 95% CI: 1.2-14.0; P = 0.02). This is the first report of an association of T. gondii infection and female sex workers.Entities:
Keywords: Toxoplasma gondii; case-control study; female sex workers; risk factors; seroprevalence
Year: 2015 PMID: 26716017 PMCID: PMC4681356 DOI: 10.1556/1886.2015.00039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) ISSN: 2062-509X
Sociodemographic characteristics of female sex workers and prevalence of T. gondii infection
| Characteristics | No. | Prevalence of | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | |||
| Age groups (years) | ||||
| 30 or less | 51 | 8 | 15.7 | 0.99 |
| 31–50 | 71 | 11 | 15.5 | |
| >50 | 14 | 2 | 14.3 | |
| Birth place | ||||
| Durango State | 113 | 9 | 8.0 | <0.0001 |
| Other Mexican State | 23 | 12 | 52.2 | |
| Residence place | ||||
| Durango State | 135 | 20 | 14.8 | 0.15 |
| Other Mexican State | 1 | 1 | 100.0 | |
| Residence area | ||||
| Urban | 126 | 21 | 16.7 | 0.37 |
| Suburban | 9 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Rural | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Educational level | ||||
| No education | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.68 |
| 1 to 6 years | 39 | 8 | 20.5 | |
| 7–12 years | 87 | 12 | 13.8 | |
| >12 years | 7 | 1 | 14.3 | |
| Socioeconomic level | ||||
| Low | 28 | 7 | 25.0 | 0.11 |
| Medium | 108 | 14 | 13.0 | |
Correlation of T. gondii infection and work characteristics of female sex workers
| Characteristics | No. | Prevalence of | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | |||
| Duration in the activity | ||||
| Less than 5 years | 13 | 1 | 7.7 | 0.66 |
| 5 to 10 years | 21 | 4 | 19.0 | |
| More than 10 years | 102 | 16 | 15.7 | |
| Condom use | ||||
| Up to 50% of times | 33 | 2 | 6.1 | 0.08 |
| More than 50% of times | 103 | 19 | 18.4 | |
| Condom breakage | ||||
| Never | 51 | 11 | 21.6 | 0.68 |
| Occasionally (1–5/10 times) | 63 | 9 | 14.3 | |
| Almost always (6–9/10 times) | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Always | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Oral sex | ||||
| Yes | 88 | 15 | 17.0 | 0.48 |
| No | 48 | 6 | 12.5 | |
| Anal sex | ||||
| Yes | 12 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.21 |
| No | 124 | 21 | 16.9 | |
| Mean number of clients a week | ||||
| Up to 20 | 114 | 13 | 11.4 | 0.003 |
| More than 20 | 22 | 8 | 36.4 | |
| Number of clients in life | ||||
| Less than 100 | 68 | 7 | 10.3 | 0.17 |
| 100–500 | 34 | 6 | 17.6 | |
| More than 500 | 33 | 8 | 24.2 | |
| Sex work in other Mexican states | ||||
| Yes | 41 | 7 | 17.1 | 0.72 |
| No | 95 | 14 | 14.7 | |
| Sex work abroad | ||||
| Yes | 2 | 1 | 50.0 | 0.28 |
| No | 134 | 20 | 14.9 | |
| Injuries during sex work | ||||
| Yes | 9 | 4 | 44.4 | 0.03 |
| No | 127 | 17 | 13.4 | |
| Sexually transmitted diseases | ||||
| Yes | 36 | 9 | 25.0 | 0.06 |
| No | 99 | 12 | 12.0 | |
Bivariate analysis of selected putative risk factors for infection with Toxoplasma gondii in female sex workers
| Characteristics | Subjects tested | Prevalence of | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | No. | % | ||
| Cats at home | ||||
| Yes | 53 | 11 | 20.8 | 0.17 |
| No | 83 | 10 | 12.0 | |
| Birds at home | ||||
| Yes | 40 | 9 | 22.5 | 0.14 |
| No | 96 | 12 | 12.5 | |
| Pork meat consumption | ||||
| Yes | 114 | 20 | 17.5 | 0.19 |
| No | 22 | 1 | 4.5 | |
| Pigeon meat consumption | ||||
| Yes | 5 | 2 | 40.0 | 0.17 |
| No | 131 | 19 | 14.5 | |
| Rabbit meat consumption | ||||
| Yes | 17 | 5 | 29.4 | 0.08 |
| No | 119 | 16 | 13.4 | |
| Squirrel meat consumption | ||||
| Yes | 7 | 3 | 42.9 | 0.07 |
| No | 129 | 18 | 14.0 | |
| Horse meat consumption | ||||
| Yes | 8 | 3 | 37.5 | 0.10 |
| No | 128 | 18 | 14.1 | |
| Opossum meat consumption | ||||
| Yes | 1 | 1 | 100.0 | 0.15 |
| No | 135 | 20 | 14.8 | |
| Armadillo meat consumption | ||||
| Yes | 3 | 2 | 66.7 | 0.06 |
| No | 133 | 19 | 14.3 | |
| Iguana meat consumption | ||||
| Yes | 4 | 3 | 75.0 | 0.01 |
| No | 132 | 18 | 13.6 | |
| Chorizo consumption | ||||
| Yes | 122 | 17 | 13.9 | 0.23 |
| No | 14 | 4 | 28.6 | |
| Beef intestines consumption | ||||
| Yes | 84 | 9 | 10.7 | 0.05 |
| No | 52 | 12 | 23.1 | |
| Unwashed raw vegetables | ||||
| Yes | 7 | 2 | 28.6 | 0.29 |
| No | 129 | 19 | 14.7 | |
| Soil contact | ||||
| Yes | 34 | 9 | 26.5 | 0.04 |
| No | 102 | 12 | 11.8 | |
Multivariate analysis of selected characteristics of female sex workers and their association with T. gondii infection
| Characteristics | Odds ratio | 95% Confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Born out of Durango State | 10.47 | 2.9–36.8 | <0.01 |
| More than 20 clients per week | 2.76 | 0.6–11.0 | 0.14 |
| Injuries during sex work | 6.30 | 1.1–33.7 | 0.03 |
| Iguana meat consumption | 7.83 | 0.2–218.6 | 0.22 |
| Soil contact | 4.11 | 1.2–14.0 | 0.02 |