Literature DB >> 26715661

RAD Capture (Rapture): Flexible and Efficient Sequence-Based Genotyping.

Omar A Ali1, Sean M O'Rourke1, Stephen J Amish2, Mariah H Meek3, Gordon Luikart4, Carson Jeffres5, Michael R Miller6.   

Abstract

Massively parallel sequencing has revolutionized many areas of biology, but sequencing large amounts of DNA in many individuals is cost-prohibitive and unnecessary for many studies. Genomic complexity reduction techniques such as sequence capture and restriction enzyme-based methods enable the analysis of many more individuals per unit cost. Despite their utility, current complexity reduction methods have limitations, especially when large numbers of individuals are analyzed. Here we develop a much improved restriction site-associated DNA (RAD) sequencing protocol and a new method called Rapture ( R: AD c APTURE: ). The new RAD protocol improves versatility by separating RAD tag isolation and sequencing library preparation into two distinct steps. This protocol also recovers more unique (nonclonal) RAD fragments, which improves both standard RAD and Rapture analysis. Rapture then uses an in-solution capture of chosen RAD tags to target sequencing reads to desired loci. Rapture combines the benefits of both RAD and sequence capture, i.e., very inexpensive and rapid library preparation for many individuals as well as high specificity in the number and location of genomic loci analyzed. Our results demonstrate that Rapture is a rapid and flexible technology capable of analyzing a very large number of individuals with minimal sequencing and library preparation cost. The methods presented here should improve the efficiency of genetic analysis for many aspects of agricultural, environmental, and biomedical science.
Copyright © 2016 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genotyping; massively parallel sequencing; population genetics; rainbow trout; restriction-site associated DNA (RAD); sequence capture

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26715661      PMCID: PMC4788223          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.183665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  33 in total

Review 1.  Next-generation sequencing technologies for environmental DNA research.

Authors:  Shadi Shokralla; Jennifer L Spall; Joel F Gibson; Mehrdad Hajibabaei
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 2.  Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  John W Davey; Paul A Hohenlohe; Paul D Etter; Jason Q Boone; Julian M Catchen; Mark L Blaxter
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data.

Authors:  Heng Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  The real cost of sequencing: higher than you think!

Authors:  Andrea Sboner; Xinmeng Jasmine Mu; Dov Greenbaum; Raymond K Auerbach; Mark B Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 5.  Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Rasmus Nielsen; Joshua S Paul; Anders Albrechtsen; Yun S Song
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing.

Authors:  Gonçalo R Abecasis; David Altshuler; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Richard M Durbin; Richard A Gibbs; Matt E Hurles; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  The expanding scope of DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Jay Shendure; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  A conserved haplotype controls parallel adaptation in geographically distant salmonid populations.

Authors:  Michael R Miller; Joseph P Brunelli; Paul A Wheeler; Sixin Liu; Caird E Rexroad; Yniv Palti; Chris Q Doe; Gary H Thorgaard
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Local de novo assembly of RAD paired-end contigs using short sequencing reads.

Authors:  Paul D Etter; Jessica L Preston; Susan Bassham; William A Cresko; Eric A Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Exome-wide DNA capture and next generation sequencing in domestic and wild species.

Authors:  Ted Cosart; Albano Beja-Pereira; Shanyuan Chen; Sarah B Ng; Jay Shendure; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  85 in total

1.  Anthropogenic habitat alteration leads to rapid loss of adaptive variation and restoration potential in wild salmon populations.

Authors:  Tasha Q Thompson; M Renee Bellinger; Sean M O'Rourke; Daniel J Prince; Alexander E Stevenson; Antonia T Rodrigues; Matthew R Sloat; Camilla F Speller; Dongya Y Yang; Virginia L Butler; Michael A Banks; Michael R Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Precipitation and vegetation shape patterns of genomic and craniometric variation in the central African rodent Praomys misonnei.

Authors:  Katy Morgan; Jean-François Mboumba; Stephan Ntie; Patrick Mickala; Courtney A Miller; Ying Zhen; Ryan J Harrigan; Vinh Le Underwood; Kristen Ruegg; Eric B Fokam; Geraud C Tasse Taboue; Paul R Sesink Clee; Trevon Fuller; Thomas B Smith; Nicola M Anthony
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Disease swamps molecular signatures of genetic-environmental associations to abiotic factors in Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) populations.

Authors:  Alexandra K Fraik; Mark J Margres; Brendan Epstein; Soraia Barbosa; Menna Jones; Sarah Hendricks; Barbara Schönfeld; Amanda R Stahlke; Anne Veillet; Rodrigo Hamede; Hamish McCallum; Elisa Lopez-Contreras; Samantha J Kallinen; Paul A Hohenlohe; Joanna L Kelley; Andrew Storfer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Deriving genotypes from RAD-seq short-read data using Stacks.

Authors:  Nicolas C Rochette; Julian M Catchen
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  A profusion of confusion in NGS methods naming.

Authors:  James Hadfield; Jacques Retief
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  A targeted genotyping-by-sequencing tool (Rapture) for genomics-assisted breeding in oat.

Authors:  Wubishet A Bekele; Asuka Itaya; Brian Boyle; Weikai Yan; Jennifer Mitchell Fetch; Nicholas A Tinker
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 7.  Harnessing the power of RADseq for ecological and evolutionary genomics.

Authors:  Kimberly R Andrews; Jeffrey M Good; Michael R Miller; Gordon Luikart; Paul A Hohenlohe
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Two centuries of monarch butterfly collections reveal contrasting effects of range expansion and migration loss on wing traits.

Authors:  Micah G Freedman; Hugh Dingle; Sharon Y Strauss; Santiago R Ramírez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A bioinformatic pipeline for identifying informative SNP panels for parentage assignment from RADseq data.

Authors:  Kimberly R Andrews; Jennifer R Adams; E Frances Cassirer; Raina K Plowright; Colby Gardner; Maggie Dwire; Paul A Hohenlohe; Lisette P Waits
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 7.090

10.  Capturing Darwin's dream.

Authors:  Travis C Glenn; Brant C Faircloth
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.