Literature DB >> 31802146

A targeted genotyping-by-sequencing tool (Rapture) for genomics-assisted breeding in oat.

Wubishet A Bekele1, Asuka Itaya1, Brian Boyle2, Weikai Yan1, Jennifer Mitchell Fetch3, Nicholas A Tinker4.   

Abstract

We adapted and tested a Rapture assay as an enhancement of genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in oat (Avena sativa). This assay was based on an additional bait-based capture of specific DNA fragments representing approximately 10,000 loci within the enzyme-based complexity reduction provided by GBS. By increasing the specificity of GBS to include only those fragments that provided effective polymorphic markers, it was possible to achieve deeper sequence coverage of target markers, while simultaneously sequencing a greater number of samples on a single unit of next-generation sequencing. The Rapture assay consistently out-performed the GBS assay when filtering markers at 80% completeness or greater, even though the total number of reads per sample was only 25% that of GBS. The reduced sequencing cost per sample for Rapture more than compensated for the increased cost of the capture reaction. Thus, Rapture generated a more repeatable set of marker data at a cost per sample that was approximately 40% less than GBS. Additional advantages of Rapture included accurate identification of heterozygotes, and the possibility to increase the depth or length of sequence reads with less impact on the cost per sample. We tested Rapture for genomic selection and diversity analysis and concluded that it is an effective alternative to GBS or other SNP assays. We recommend the use of Rapture in oat and the development of similar assays in other crops with large complex genomes.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31802146     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-019-03496-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  17 in total

1.  RAD Capture (Rapture): Flexible and Efficient Sequence-Based Genotyping.

Authors:  Omar A Ali; Sean M O'Rourke; Stephen J Amish; Mariah H Meek; Gordon Luikart; Carson Jeffres; Michael R Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Rapid and cost-effective polymorphism identification and genotyping using restriction site associated DNA (RAD) markers.

Authors:  Michael R Miller; Joseph P Dunham; Angel Amores; William A Cresko; Eric A Johnson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  A Consensus Map in Cultivated Hexaploid Oat Reveals Conserved Grass Synteny with Substantial Subgenome Rearrangement.

Authors:  Ashley S Chaffin; Yung-Fen Huang; Scott Smith; Wubishet A Bekele; Ebrahiem Babiker; Belaghihalli N Gnanesh; Bradley J Foresman; Steven G Blanchard; Jeremy J Jay; Robert W Reid; Charlene P Wight; Shiaoman Chao; Rebekah Oliver; Emir Islamovic; Frederic L Kolb; Curt McCartney; Jennifer W Mitchell Fetch; Aaron D Beattie; Åsmund Bjørnstad; J Michael Bonman; Tim Langdon; Catherine J Howarth; Cory R Brouwer; Eric N Jellen; Kathy Esvelt Klos; Jesse A Poland; Tzung-Fu Hsieh; Ryan Brown; Eric Jackson; Jessica A Schlueter; Nicholas A Tinker
Journal:  Plant Genome       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Development of high-density genetic maps for barley and wheat using a novel two-enzyme genotyping-by-sequencing approach.

Authors:  Jesse A Poland; Patrick J Brown; Mark E Sorrells; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sequence-based genotyping for marker discovery and co-dominant scoring in germplasm and populations.

Authors:  Hoa T Truong; A Marcos Ramos; Feyruz Yalcin; Marjo de Ruiter; Hein J A van der Poel; Koen H J Huvenaars; René C J Hogers; Leonora J G van Enckevort; Antoine Janssen; Nathalie J van Orsouw; Michiel J T van Eijk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Haplotag: Software for Haplotype-Based Genotyping-by-Sequencing Analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas A Tinker; Wubishet A Bekele; Jiro Hattori
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  LinkImpute: Fast and Accurate Genotype Imputation for Nonmodel Organisms.

Authors:  Daniel Money; Kyle Gardner; Zoë Migicovsky; Heidi Schwaninger; Gan-Yuan Zhong; Sean Myles
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  A Whole Genome DArTseq and SNP Analysis for Genetic Diversity Assessment in Durum Wheat from Central Fertile Crescent.

Authors:  Faheem Shehzad Baloch; Ahmad Alsaleh; Muhammad Qasim Shahid; Vahdettin Çiftçi; Luis E Sáenz de Miera; Muhammad Aasim; Muhammad Azhar Nadeem; Husnu Aktaş; Hakan Özkan; Rüştü Hatipoğlu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Optimising Genomic Selection in Wheat: Effect of Marker Density, Population Size and Population Structure on Prediction Accuracy.

Authors:  Adam Norman; Julian Taylor; James Edwards; Haydn Kuchel
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Comparing Pool-seq, Rapture, and GBS genotyping for inferring weak population structure: The American lobster (Homarus americanus) as a case study.

Authors:  Yann Dorant; Laura Benestan; Quentin Rougemont; Eric Normandeau; Brian Boyle; Rémy Rochette; Louis Bernatchez
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-05-26       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Breeding oat for resistance to the crown rust pathogen Puccinia coronata f. sp. avenae: achievements and prospects.

Authors:  R F Park; W H P Boshoff; A L Cabral; J Chong; J A Martinelli; M S McMullen; J W Mitchell Fetch; E Paczos-Grzęda; E Prats; J Roake; S Sowa; L Ziems; D Singh
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 5.699

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.