AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopically-assisted right hemicolectomy (LRH) and open right hemicolectomy (ORH) in elderly patients. Patients and methods-Results. Seventy-five patients underwent right hemicolectomy for cancer during the study period, with 41 patients aged ≥ 70 years old. Twenty-four patients underwent ORH and seventeen patients had a LRH (58% vs 42%).We found no differences between ORH and LRH in terms of mean operative time :89,5 minutes in open vs 80 minutes in laparoscopic group and return of bowel function (2,76 vs 2,54 days). Also the length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups (8,5 days in ORH vs 7 days in LRH - p 0,06). Postoperative morbidity was higher in ORH (25% vs 5%) though not statistically significant and the incidence of anastomotic leakage was similar between the two groups (8% vs 5%). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic RH in an elderly population is feasible and safe. However, we found no evidence to suggest that it is better than open RH and think that the decision regarding the method of operation should reflect surgeon expertise, patient co-morbidities and the necessity to perform extended resections.
AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopically-assisted right hemicolectomy (LRH) and open right hemicolectomy (ORH) in elderly patients. Patients and methods-Results. Seventy-five patients underwent right hemicolectomy for cancer during the study period, with 41 patients aged ≥ 70 years old. Twenty-four patients underwent ORH and seventeen patients had a LRH (58% vs 42%).We found no differences between ORH and LRH in terms of mean operative time :89,5 minutes in open vs 80 minutes in laparoscopic group and return of bowel function (2,76 vs 2,54 days). Also the length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups (8,5 days in ORH vs 7 days in LRH - p 0,06). Postoperative morbidity was higher in ORH (25% vs 5%) though not statistically significant and the incidence of anastomotic leakage was similar between the two groups (8% vs 5%). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic RH in an elderly population is feasible and safe. However, we found no evidence to suggest that it is better than open RH and think that the decision regarding the method of operation should reflect surgeon expertise, patient co-morbidities and the necessity to perform extended resections.
Authors: Andrea Vignali; Saverio Di Palo; Andrea Tamburini; Giovanni Radaelli; Elena Orsenigo; Carlo Staudacher Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: A A F A Veenhof; M H G M van der Pas; D L van der Peet; H J Bonjer; W J H J Meijerink; M A Cuesta; A F Engel Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: Peter J Hewett; Randall A Allardyce; Philip F Bagshaw; Christopher M Frampton; Francis A Frizelle; Nicholas A Rieger; J Shona Smith; Michael J Solomon; Jacqueline H Stephens; Andrew R L Stevenson Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 12.969