Literature DB >> 16086219

Laparoscopic vs. open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study.

Andrea Vignali1, Saverio Di Palo, Andrea Tamburini, Giovanni Radaelli, Elena Orsenigo, Carlo Staudacher.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define any benefits in terms of early outcome for laparoscopic colectomy in patients over 80 years old compared with open colectomy.
METHODS: Sixty-one patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer were matched to 61 open colectomy patients for gender, age, year of surgery, site of cancer, and comorbidity on admission. Independence status on admission and at discharge from the hospital was also evaluated.
RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation) age was 82.3 (3.5) years in the laparoscopy group and 83.1 (3.3) years in the open group. Conversion rate was 6.1 percent. Operative time was 49 minutes longer in the laparoscopy group (P = 0.001). The overall mortality rate was 2.4 percent. The morbidity rate was 21.5 percent in the laparoscopy group and 31.1 percent in the open group (P = 0.30). Patients in the laparoscopy group had a faster recovery of bowel function (P = 0.01) and a significant reduction of the mean length of hospital stay (9.8 vs. 12.9 days for the open group, P = 0.001). Laparoscopy allowed a better preservation of postoperative independence status compared with the that of the open group (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in octogenarians is safe and beneficial including preservation of postoperative independence and a reduction of length of hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16086219     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0147-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  47 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in the elderly population.

Authors:  Katherine Grailey; Sheraz R Markar; Alan Karthikesalingam; Rima Aboud; Paul Ziprin; Omar Faiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of short, long-term surgical outcomes and mid-term health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer: a case-matched control study.

Authors:  Shoichi Fujii; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Yasushi Ichikawa; Shigeru Yamagishi; Kazuteru Watanabe; Kenji Tatsumi; Jun Watanabe; Hirokazu Suwa; Takashi Oshima; Chikara Kunisaki; Shigeo Ohki; Itaru Endo; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Incidence and risk factors of postoperative delirium in elderly patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuyoshi Tei; Masaki Wakasugi; Kentaro Kishi; Masahiro Tanemura; Hiroki Akamatsu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Laparoscopic colectomy is safe and leads to a significantly shorter hospital stay for octogenarians.

Authors:  Lei Lian; Matthew Kalady; Daniel Geisler; Ravi Pokala Kiran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched control study.

Authors:  A Vignali; S Di Palo; P De Nardi; G Radaelli; E Orsenigo; C Staudacher
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Considerations on the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a view from the bottom.

Authors:  S Leong; R A Cahill; B J Mehigan; R B Stephens
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Laparoscopy for benign colorectal diseases.

Authors:  Thomas Shin; Janice F Rafferty
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

8.  Short-term outcomes of open versus laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takeshi Nishikawa; Soichiro Ishihara; Keisuke Hata; Koji Murono; Koji Yasuda; Kensuke Otani; Toshiaki Tanaka; Tomomichi Kiyomatsu; Kazushige Kawai; Hiroaki Nozawa; Hironori Yamaguchi; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer in the elderly: comparison with open surgery for patients 80 years and older.

Authors:  In Gyu Kwon; In Cho; Ali Guner; Hyoung-il Kim; Sung Hoon Noh; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Safety of robotic general surgery in elderly patients.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; Pietro Addeo; Francesco M Bianco; Subhashini Ayloo; Enrique F Elli; Pier C Giulianotti
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.