Literature DB >> 16235395

Transverse verses midline incisions for abdominal surgery.

S R Brown1, P B Goodfellow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The choice of surgical incision in the abdomen is determined by access for surgery. It has been suggested that utilising a transverse or oblique rather than a midline incision may influence other parameters such as recovery and complication rates. However, there is little consensus in the literature as to whether a particular incision confers any advantage.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a midline incision or a transverse incision (including oblique incision) confers any recovery advantage to the patient. SEARCH STRATEGY: Search terms included randomised trials containing combinations of the following: 'abdominal', 'incisions', 'horizontal', 'transverse', 'vertical', 'midline', and 'laparotomy'. SELECTION CRITERIA: All prospective randomised trials comparing midline with transverse incisions for abdominal surgery were included. Caesarian sections were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors assessed the methodological quality of potentially eligible trials and independently extracted data from the included trials. A wide range of outcome measures was considered. MAIN
RESULTS: Due to differences in the method of assessment, the variability of data and the heterogeneity of the participant groups it was difficult to pool some of the outcome data. Despite these limitations, and potentially significant biases related to methodological quality, there was evidence to suggest that a transverse or oblique incision may be less painful and have less impact on pulmonary function than a midline incision, particularly in the early postoperative period. However, there was no difference seen in early or late postoperative complications between a transverse or oblique and a midline incision and recovery times were similar. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Both analgesia use and pulmonary compromise may be reduced with a transverse or oblique incision but this does not seem to be significant clinically as complication rates and recovery times are the same as with midline incision. The methodological and clinical diversity and the potential for bias in the included studies also mean that the results in favour of a transverse or oblique incision, particularly with regard to analgesic use, should be treated with caution. The optimal incision for abdominal surgery still remains the preference of the surgeon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16235395      PMCID: PMC8866010          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005199.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  30 in total

1.  Abdominal incisions: techniques and postoperative complications.

Authors:  J W A Burger; M van 't Riet; J Jeekel
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.360

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised control trials.

Authors:  Sanjay Purkayastha; Henry S Tilney; Panagiotis Georgiou; Thanos Athanasiou; Paris P Tekkis; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Approach to the abdominal aorta: impairment of respiratory function after supraumbilical transverse and midline laparotomy.

Authors:  M Massucci; D Lauri; V Faraglia; F Speziale; F De Santis; M Taurino; F Dotta; A Galantino; R Guerricchio; P Fiorani
Journal:  Ital J Surg Sci       Date:  1989

4.  Left retroperitoneal versus midline transperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) repair.

Authors:  Kamphol Laohapensang; Kittipan Rerkasem; Narain Chotirosniramit
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2005-05

5.  Abdominal incisions--vertical or transverse?

Authors:  H Ellis; P D Coleridge-Smith; A D Joyce
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Midline or transverse laparotomy? A random controlled clinical trial. Part II: Influence on postoperative pulmonary complications.

Authors:  M J Greenall; M Evans; A V Pollock
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Choice of incision and pain following gallbladder surgery.

Authors:  P J Armstrong; R W Burgess
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Prospective randomized study of two laparotomy incisions for gastrectomy: midline incision versus transverse incision.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Inaba; Kota Okinaga; Ryoji Fukushima; Hisae Iinuma; Takashi Ogihara; Fujio Ogawa; Kota Iwasaki; Masanao Tanaka; Hideki Yamada
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Midline versus transverse incision in major abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind equivalence trial (POVATI: ISRCTN60734227).

Authors:  Christoph M Seiler; Andreas Deckert; Markus K Diener; Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Markus A Weigand; Norbert Victor; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Abdominal incisions: transverse vs vertical placement and continuous vs interrupted closure.

Authors:  H H Stone; S J Hoefling; P R Strom; W E Dunlop; T C Fabian
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 0.954

View more
  58 in total

Review 1.  [Approaches to the abdominal cavity and closure of the abdominal wall].

Authors:  Y Dittmar; F Rauchfuss; M Ardelt; U Settmacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  A comparison of short-term outcome after laparoscopic, transverse, and midline right-sided colectomy.

Authors:  E Tanis; A A W van Geloven; W A Bemelman; J Wind
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  [Surgical standards in perioperative treatment].

Authors:  A Richter
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Incidence of abdominal incisional hernia in developing country: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Litian Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

5.  Mass Continuous Suture versus Layered Interrupted Suture in Transverse Abdominal Incision Closure after Liver Resection.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Hong-Ke Zhang; Hao-Yang Zhu; Jian-Wen Lu; Qiang Lu; Yi-Fan Ren; Chang Liu; Jian Dong; Zhao-Qing Du; Xue-Min Liu; Zheng Wu; Yi Lv; Xu-Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  [A survey of perioperative therapy for elective colon resection in Germany, 2006].

Authors:  T Hasenberg; P Rittler; S Post; K W Jauch; M Senkal; C Spies; W Schwenk; E Shang
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Open versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in the elderly population.

Authors:  Aaron J Quyn; Osama Moussa; Fergus Millar; David M Smith; Robert Jc Steele
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-06-27

8.  Surgery: A midline or transverse abdominal incision?

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 46.802

9.  Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies.

Authors:  Philipp Kirchhoff; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2010-03-25

Review 10.  Perioperative management in distal pancreatectomy: results of a survey in 23 European participating centres of the DISPACT trial and a review of literature.

Authors:  Helge Bruns; Nuh N Rahbari; Thorsten Löffler; Markus K Diener; Christoph M Seiler; Matthias Glanemann; Giovanni Butturini; Christoph Schuhmacher; Inga Rossion; Markus W Büchler; Tido Junghans
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-07-26       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.