Literature DB >> 31737189

Experimental factors are associated with fetal fraction in size selection noninvasive prenatal testing.

Longwei Qiao1,2, Jun Mao1,2, Minjuan Liu1,2, Yinghua Liu1,2, Xiaoyan Song1,2, Hui Tang1,2, Qing Zhang1,2, Hong Li1,2, Yaojuan Lu3, Yuting Liang4, Ting Wang1,2.   

Abstract

Every year, 4-6 million pregnant women undergo noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), which is used worldwide for fetal aneuploidy screening. Adequate fetal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is the critically important factor to ensure high sensitivity and specificity. In this study, we sought to increase the fetal fraction by adjusting experimental factors in the size selection for NIPT. CfDNA was extracted from 1495 pregnant women at 12-26 weeks of gestation for sequencing of shorter cfDNA NIPT (< 140 bp). Multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between experimental factors and fetal fraction. Nomograms for the likelihood of high fetal fraction (> 20%) were constructed according to significant factors in multivariable regression models. Our results suggested that cfDNA and library concentrations were negatively correlated with fetal fraction, and uniquely mapped reads were positively correlated with fetal fraction. Lower cfDNA and library concentrations, shorter cfDNA fragments, and higher uniquely mapped reads may be more conducive to obtaining higher fetal fractions. Furthermore, we constructed easy-to-use nomograms incorporating the maternal, fetal characteristics and experimental factors to precisely predict the probability of high fetal fraction with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.773 (95% confidence interval: 0.749-0.797). Collectively, our maternal plasma cfDNA-based nomograms consider experimental factors that can be adjusted and may improve a laboratory's ability to obtain higher fetal cfDNA concentrations. AJTR
Copyright © 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Noninvasive prenatal testing; experimental factors; fetal fraction

Year:  2019        PMID: 31737189      PMCID: PMC6834515     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transl Res            Impact factor:   4.060


  29 in total

1.  Maternal plasma DNA sequencing reveals the genome-wide genetic and mutational profile of the fetus.

Authors:  Y M Dennis Lo; K C Allen Chan; Hao Sun; Eric Z Chen; Peiyong Jiang; Fiona M F Lun; Yama W Zheng; Tak Y Leung; Tze K Lau; Charles R Cantor; Rossa W K Chiu
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Sequencing of short cfDNA fragments in NIPT improves fetal fraction with higher maternal BMI and early gestational age.

Authors:  Longwei Qiao; Qin Zhang; Yuting Liang; Ang Gao; Yang Ding; Nannan Zhao; Wei Zhang; Hong Li; Yaojuan Lu; Ting Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Classification of factors involved in nonreportable results of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and prediction of success rate of second NIPT.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Suzumori; Akihiko Sekizawa; Eri Takeda; Osamu Samura; Aiko Sasaki; Rina Akaishi; Seiji Wada; Haruka Hamanoue; Fumiki Hirahara; Hiroko Kuriki; Hideaki Sawai; Hiroaki Nakamura; Takahiro Yamada; Kiyonori Miura; Hideaki Masuzaki; Takahiro Yamashita; Yoshimasa Kamei; Akira Namba; Jun Murotsuki; Tomohiro Tanemoto; Akimune Fukushima; Kazufumi Haino; Shinya Tairaku; Keiichi Matsubara; Kazutoshi Maeda; Takashi Kaji; Masanobu Ogawa; Hisao Osada; Haruki Nishizawa; Yoko Okamoto; Takeshi Kanagawa; Aiko Kakigano; Masayuki Endo; Michihiro Kitagawa; Masaki Ogawa; Shunichiro Izumi; Yukiko Katagiri; Naoki Takeshita; Yasuyo Kasai; Katsuhiko Naruse; Reiko Neki; Hisashi Masuyama; Maki Hyodo; Yukie Kawano; Takashi Ohba; Kiyotake Ichizuka; Takeshi Nagamatsu; Atsushi Watanabe; Naomi Nishikawa; Naoki Hamajima; Nahoko Shirato; Junko Yotsumoto; Miyuki Nishiyama; Keiko Koide; Tatsuko Hirose; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  The association between anticoagulation therapy, maternal characteristics, and a failed cfDNA test due to a low fetal fraction.

Authors:  Whitney Burns; Nathanael Koelper; Andrea Barberio; Mary Deagostino-Kelly; Michael Mennuti; Mary D Sammel; Lorraine Dugoff
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Cell-free fetal DNA testing in singleton IVF conceptions.

Authors:  Timothy J Lee; Daniel L Rolnik; Melody A Menezes; Andrew C McLennan; Fabricio da Silva Costa
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  The Long and Short of Circulating Cell-Free DNA and the Ins and Outs of Molecular Diagnostics.

Authors:  Peiyong Jiang; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Quantity versus quality: optimal methods for cell-free DNA isolation from plasma of pregnant women.

Authors:  Carolina J Jorgez; Dianne D Dang; Joe Leigh Simpson; Dorothy E Lewis; Farideh Z Bischoff
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Performance of Streck cfDNA Blood Collection Tubes for Liquid Biopsy Testing.

Authors:  Inga Medina Diaz; Annette Nocon; Daniel H Mehnert; Johannes Fredebohm; Frank Diehl; Frank Holtrup
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An enrichment method to increase cell-free fetal DNA fraction and significantly reduce false negatives and test failures for non-invasive prenatal screening: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Ping Hu; Dong Liang; Yangyi Chen; Ying Lin; Fengchang Qiao; Hang Li; Ting Wang; Chunfang Peng; Donghong Luo; Hailiang Liu; Zhengfeng Xu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Size-tagged preferred ends in maternal plasma DNA shed light on the production mechanism and show utility in noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Kun Sun; Peiyong Jiang; Ada I C Wong; Yvonne K Y Cheng; Suk Hang Cheng; Haiqiang Zhang; K C Allen Chan; Tak Y Leung; Rossa W K Chiu; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  Lipid Metabolism Affects Fetal Fraction and Screen Failures in Non-invasive Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Jun Cao; Longwei Qiao; Jieyu Jin; Sheng Zhang; Ping Chen; Haoyu Tang; Zheng Yu; Jingye Shi; Ting Wang; Yuting Liang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-12

Review 2.  Factors Affecting the Fetal Fraction in Noninvasive Prenatal Screening: A Review.

Authors:  Cechuan Deng; Shanling Liu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  A fetal fraction enrichment method reduces false negatives and increases test success rate of fetal chromosome aneuploidy detection in early pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Longwei Qiao; Bin Zhang; Xiaojuan Wu; Chunhua Zhang; Ying Xue; Hui Tang; Haoyu Tang; Jingye Shi; Yuting Liang; Bin Yu; Ting Wang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 8.440

4.  Follow-up in Patients With Non-invasive Prenatal Screening Failures: A Reflection on the Choice of Further Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  Sha Liu; Hongqian Liu; Jianlong Liu; Ting Bai; Xiaosha Jing; Tianyu Xia; Cechuan Deng; Yunyun Liu; Jing Cheng; Xiang Wei; Lingling Xing; Yuan Luo; Quanfang Zhou; Qian Zhu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Next-generation sequencing: a follow-up of 36,913 singleton pregnancies with noninvasive prenatal testing in central China.

Authors:  Wan Lu; Ting Huang; Xin-Rong Wang; Ji-Hui Zhou; Hui-Zhen Yuan; Yan Yang; Ting-Ting Huang; Dan-Ping Liu; Yan-Qiu Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.412

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.