Literature DB >> 28301696

Toward an Ethically Sensitive Implementation of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in the Global Context.

Jessica Mozersky, Vardit Ravitsky, Rayna Rapp, Marsha Michie, Subhashini Chandrasekharan, Megan Allyse.   

Abstract

Noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA, which analyzes placental DNA circulating in maternal blood to provide information about fetal chromosomal disorders early in pregnancy and without risk to the fetus, has been hailed as a potential "paradigm shift" in prenatal genetic screening. Commercial provision of cell-free DNA screening has contributed to a rapid expansion of the tests included in the screening panels. The tests can include screening for sex chromosome anomalies, rare subchromosomal microdeletions and aneuploidies, and most recently, the entire fetal genome. The benefits of this screening tool are generally framed, by both providers and commercial laboratories, as enhancing reproductive autonomy and choice by providing an earlier, simpler, and more accurate screening while potentially reducing the need for invasive follow-up testing. The majority of the literature has explored these issues empirically or conceptually from a European or North American vantage point, one that assumes normative priorities such as individual reproductive autonomy and the clinical availability of maternal health care or prenatal screening programs within which cell-free DNA screening is offered. While its implementation has raised both challenges and opportunities, very little is known about real-world experiences and the implications of the rapid introduction of cell-free DNA screening outside of North America and Europe, especially in low- and middle-income countries. To begin addressing this gap in knowledge, we organized a four-day international workshop to explore the ethical, legal, social, economic, clinical, and practical implications of the global expansion of cell-free DNA screening. We describe eight key insights that arose from the workshop.
© 2017 The Hastings Center.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28301696      PMCID: PMC5568559          DOI: 10.1002/hast.690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep        ISSN: 0093-0334            Impact factor:   2.683


  25 in total

1.  Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: the paradigm will shift, but slowly.

Authors:  P Benn; H Cuckle; E Pergament
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 2.  Carrier screening for beta-thalassaemia: a review of international practice.

Authors:  Nicole E Cousens; Clara L Gaff; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  [Increasing rates of Down syndrome among newborns in Chile from 1972 to 2005].

Authors:  Julio Nazer H; Alfredo Aguila R; Lucía Cifuentes O
Journal:  Rev Med Chil       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 0.553

4.  'Men leave me as I cannot have children': women's experiences with involuntary childlessness.

Authors:  S J Dyer; N Abrahams; M Hoffman; Z M van der Spuy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in women following positive aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Shilpa Chetty; Matthew J Garabedian; Mary E Norton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 6.  Commercial landscape of noninvasive prenatal testing in the United States.

Authors:  Ashwin Agarwal; Lauren C Sayres; Mildred K Cho; Robert Cook-Deegan; Subhashini Chandrasekharan
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Feminist discourse on sex screening and selective abortion of female foetuses.

Authors:  Farhat Moazam
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.898

8.  Is informed choice in prenatal testing universally valued? A population-based survey in Europe and Asia.

Authors:  A van den Heuvel; L Chitty; E Dormandy; A Newson; S Attwood; R Ma; B Masturzo; E Pajkrt; T M Marteau
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Cell-free fetal DNA testing: who is driving implementation?

Authors:  Jessica Mozersky; Michael T Mennuti
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Impact of prenatal technologies on the sex ratio in India: an overview.

Authors:  Kamlesh Madan; Martijn H Breuning
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  4 in total

1.  Seeing Beyond the Margins: Challenges to Informed Inclusion of Vulnerable Populations in Research.

Authors:  Sarah Gehlert; Jessica Mozersky
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Interpretations of autonomous decision-making in antenatal genetic screening among women in China, Hong Kong and Pakistan.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Huso Yi; Dong Dong; Jianfeng Zhu; Hussain Jafri; Yasmin Rashid; Olivia My Ngan; Mushtaq Ahmed
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  The Right to Know and the Right Not to Know Revisited: Part One.

Authors:  Roger Brownsword; Jeff Wale
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2017-07-13

4.  Women's perspectives on the ethical implications of non-invasive prenatal testing: a qualitative analysis to inform health policy decisions.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Alexandra Cernat; Jeff Nisker; Lisa Schwartz
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.