Literature DB >> 14579890

Relative implications of protective responses versus damage induction at low dose and low-dose-rate exposures, using the microdose approach.

L E Feinendegen1.   

Abstract

In reviewing the tissue effects of low-dose radiation (1) absorbed dose to tissue is replaced by the sum of energy deposited with track events in cell-equivalent tissue micromasses, i.e. with microdose hits, in the number of exposed micromasses and (2) induced cell damage and adaptive protection are related to microdose hits in exposed micromasses for a given radiation quality. DNA damage increases with the number of microdose hits. They also can induce adaptive protection, mainly against endogenous DNA damage. This protection involves cellular defences, DNA repair and damage removal. With increasing numbers of low linear energy transfer (LET) microdose hits in exposed micromasses, adaptive protection first tends to outweigh damage and then (above 200 mGy) fails and largely disappears. These experimental data predict that cancer risk coefficients derived by epidemiology at high-dose irradiation decline at low doses and dose rates when adaptive protection outdoes DNA damage. The dose-risk function should include both linear and non-linear terms at low doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14579890     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  9 in total

1.  Modeling cell response to low doses of photon irradiation: Part 2--application to radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in human carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Micaela Cunha; Etienne Testa; Olga V Komova; Elena A Nasonova; Larisa A Mel'nikova; Nina L Shmakova; Michaël Beuve
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Association between Local External Gamma Rays and Frequency of Cancer in Babol-Iran.

Authors:  Ali Shabestani Monfared; Karimollah Hajian; Reza Hosseini; Akbar Nasir
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 3.  Systems biology and its potential role in radiobiology.

Authors:  Ludwig Feinendegen; Philip Hahnfeldt; Eric E Schadt; Michael Stumpf; Eberhard O Voit
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Potential treatment of inflammatory and proliferative diseases by ultra-low doses of ionizing radiations.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Is the glass half full or half empty?

Authors:  Bjj Abdullah; Kh Ng
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-04-01

7.  Survival analysis of F98 glioma rat cells following minibeam or broad-beam synchrotron radiation therapy.

Authors:  Silvia Gil; Sukhéna Sarun; Albert Biete; Yolanda Prezado; Manel Sabés
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  The effect of well-characterized, very low-dose x-ray radiation on fibroblasts.

Authors:  Katelyn Truong; Suzanne Bradley; Bryana Baginski; Joseph R Wilson; Donald Medlin; Leon Zheng; R Kevin Wilson; Matthew Rusin; Endre Takacs; Delphine Dean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk Associated with Granite Bearing Radioactive Minerals and Valuable Metals, Monqul Area, North Eastern Desert, Egypt.

Authors:  Ahmed E Abdel Gawad; Khaled G Ali; Adel A Abdel Wahed; Khalid Alsafi; Mawya Khafaji; Sarah Albahiti; Magdy Khalil; Masoud S Masoud; Mohamed Y Hanfi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.748

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.