Ann M Cools1, Dorien Borms2, Birgit Castelein2, Fran Vanderstukken2, Fredrik R Johansson2,3. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 2B3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. ann.cools@ugent.be. 2. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 2B3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. 3. Department of Environmental Medicine, Musculoskeletal and Sports Injury Epidemiology Center (MUSIEC), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To give an overview of current knowledge and guidelines with respect to evidence-based rehabilitation of athletes with glenohumeral instability. METHODS: This narrative review combines scientific evidence with clinical guidelines based on the current literature to highlight the different components of the rehabilitation of glenohumeral instability. RESULTS: Depending on the specific characteristics of the instability pattern, the severity, recurrence, and direction, the therapeutic approach may be adapted to the needs and demands of the athlete. In general, attention should go to (1) restoration of rotator cuff strength and inter-muscular balance, focusing on the eccentric capacity of the external rotators, (2) normalization of rotational range of motion with special attention to the internal rotation ROM, (3) optimization of the flexibility and muscle performance of the scapular muscles, and (4) gradually increasing the functional sport-specific load on the shoulder girdle. The functional kinetic chain should be implemented throughout all stages of the rehabilitation program. Return to play should be based on subjective assessment as well as objective measurements of ROM, strength, and function. CONCLUSIONS: This paper summarizes evidence-based guidelines for treatment of glenohumeral instability. These guidelines may assist the clinician in the prevention and rehabilitation of the overhead athlete. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Expert opinion, Level V.
PURPOSE: To give an overview of current knowledge and guidelines with respect to evidence-based rehabilitation of athletes with glenohumeral instability. METHODS: This narrative review combines scientific evidence with clinical guidelines based on the current literature to highlight the different components of the rehabilitation of glenohumeral instability. RESULTS: Depending on the specific characteristics of the instability pattern, the severity, recurrence, and direction, the therapeutic approach may be adapted to the needs and demands of the athlete. In general, attention should go to (1) restoration of rotator cuff strength and inter-muscular balance, focusing on the eccentric capacity of the external rotators, (2) normalization of rotational range of motion with special attention to the internal rotation ROM, (3) optimization of the flexibility and muscle performance of the scapular muscles, and (4) gradually increasing the functional sport-specific load on the shoulder girdle. The functional kinetic chain should be implemented throughout all stages of the rehabilitation program. Return to play should be based on subjective assessment as well as objective measurements of ROM, strength, and function. CONCLUSIONS: This paper summarizes evidence-based guidelines for treatment of glenohumeral instability. These guidelines may assist the clinician in the prevention and rehabilitation of the overhead athlete. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Expert opinion, Level V.
Authors: Ann M J Cools; Fran Vanderstukken; Frédéric Vereecken; Mattias Duprez; Karel Heyman; Nick Goethals; Fredrik Johansson Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Ann M Cools; Vincent Dewitte; Frederick Lanszweert; Dries Notebaert; Arne Roets; Barbara Soetens; Barbara Cagnie; Erik E Witvrouw Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2007-07-02 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Michele Forgiarini Saccol; Guilherme Conforto Gracitelli; Rogério Teixeira da Silva; Cristiano Frota de Souza Laurino; Anna Maria Fleury; Marília dos Santos Andrade; Antonio Carlos da Silva Journal: Phys Ther Sport Date: 2009-12-11 Impact factor: 2.365
Authors: Ellen Shanley; Mitchell J Rauh; Lori A Michener; Todd S Ellenbecker; J Craig Garrison; Charles A Thigpen Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2011-06-17 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Sara R Piva; Kelley Fitzgerald; James J Irrgang; Scott Jones; Benjamin R Hando; David A Browder; John D Childs Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2006-03-31 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Michael A Stone; Omid Jalali; Ram K Alluri; Paul R Diaz; Reza Omid; Seth C Gamradt; James E Tibone; Erik N Mayer; Alexander Weber Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2018-04