Ann M J Cools1, Fran Vanderstukken2, Frédéric Vereecken2, Mattias Duprez2, Karel Heyman2, Nick Goethals2, Fredrik Johansson2,3. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 2B3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. ann.cools@ugent.be. 2. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 2B3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. 3. Department of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Musculoskeletal and Sports Injury Epidemiology Center (MUSIEC), Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In order to provide science-based guidelines for injury prevention or return to play, regular measurement of isometric and eccentric internal (IR) and external (ER) rotator strength is warranted in overhead athletes. However, up to date, no normative database exists regarding these values, when measured with a hand-held dynamometer. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to provide a normative database on isometric and eccentric rotator cuff (RC) strength values in a sample of overhead athletes, and to discuss gender, age and sports differences. METHODS: A HHD was used to measure RC strength in 201 overhead athletes between 18 and 50 years old from three different sports disciplines: tennis, volleyball and handball. Isometric as well as eccentric strength was measured in different shoulder positions. Outcome variables of interest were isometric ER and IR strength, eccentric ER strength, and intermuscular strength ratios ER/IR. RESULTS: Our results show significant side, gender and sports discipline differences in the isometric and eccentric RC strength. However, when normalized to body weight, gender differences often are absent. In general, strength differences are in favour of the dominant side, the male athletes and handball. Intermuscular ER/IR ratios showed gender, sports, and side differences. CONCLUSION: This normative database is necessary to help the clinician in the evaluation of RC strength in healthy and injured overhead athletes. In view of the preventive screening and return-to-play decisions in overhead athletes, normalization to body weight and calculating intermuscular ratios are key points in this evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level III.
PURPOSE: In order to provide science-based guidelines for injury prevention or return to play, regular measurement of isometric and eccentric internal (IR) and external (ER) rotator strength is warranted in overhead athletes. However, up to date, no normative database exists regarding these values, when measured with a hand-held dynamometer. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to provide a normative database on isometric and eccentric rotator cuff (RC) strength values in a sample of overhead athletes, and to discuss gender, age and sports differences. METHODS: A HHD was used to measure RC strength in 201 overhead athletes between 18 and 50 years old from three different sports disciplines: tennis, volleyball and handball. Isometric as well as eccentric strength was measured in different shoulder positions. Outcome variables of interest were isometric ER and IR strength, eccentric ER strength, and intermuscular strength ratios ER/IR. RESULTS: Our results show significant side, gender and sports discipline differences in the isometric and eccentric RC strength. However, when normalized to body weight, gender differences often are absent. In general, strength differences are in favour of the dominant side, the male athletes and handball. Intermuscular ER/IR ratios showed gender, sports, and side differences. CONCLUSION: This normative database is necessary to help the clinician in the evaluation of RC strength in healthy and injured overhead athletes. In view of the preventive screening and return-to-play decisions in overhead athletes, normalization to body weight and calculating intermuscular ratios are key points in this evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level III.
Authors: Jonathan C Reeser; Glenn S Fleisig; Ann M J Cools; Darcie Yount; Scott A Magnes Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Marilia Dos Santos Andrade; Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira; Rodrigo Luiz Vancini; Alexandre Aparecido de Almeida; Ana Amélia Benedito-Silva; Antonio Carlos da Silva Journal: Phys Ther Sport Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 2.365
Authors: Ann M Cools; Dorien Borms; Birgit Castelein; Fran Vanderstukken; Fredrik R Johansson Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-12-24 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Philippe Decleve; Joachim Van Cant; Ellen De Buck; Justine Van Doren; Julie Verkouille; Ann M Cools Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Emma M Baillargeon; Daniel Ludvig; M Hongchul Sohn; Constantine P Nicolozakes; Amee L Seitz; Eric J Perreault Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 2.368
Authors: Amanda J Arnold; Charles A Thigpen; Paul F Beattie; Stacy L Fritz; Michael J Kissenberth; John M Tokish; Ellen Shanley Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2022-02-01