Masaaki Tsuruike1, Todd S Ellenbecker2, Yoshinori Kagaya3, Luke Lemings4. 1. Department of Kinesiology, College of Health and Human Sciences, San José State University, San Jose, California. 2. Rehab Plus Sports Therapy Scottsdale and ATP Tour, Scottsdale, Arizona. 3. School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Showa University, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan. 4. Conte Sport Performance Therapy, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the optimal exercise intensity and the effects of arm position on elastic resistance exercise. The purpose of this study was to investigate scapular muscle activity in different arm positions utilized during standing elastic resistance exercise. HYPOTHESIS: Lower trapezius (LT), serratus anterior (SA), and infraspinatus (IS) muscle activity will vary across arm positions above shoulder level. Also, oscillation resistance exercise will result in increased muscle activity compared with isometric contraction. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. METHODS: A total of 19 uninjured male collegiate baseball players volunteered to participate in this study. The electromyography (EMG) activity of the LT, upper trapezius (UT), middle deltoid (MD), SA, and IS muscles was determined using surface EMG in 3 arm positions: diagonal pattern 1 (D1), 120° of shoulder abduction (120), and 90° shoulder abduction with external rotation and elbow flexion (90/90) during both isometric contraction and oscillation resistance exercise. RESULTS: No difference in EMG activity of the LT muscle was found between the 120 and 90/90 position. However, the 120 position increased UT and MD muscle activity significantly more than those of the 90/90 position. The D1 arm position significantly increased SA muscle activity more than the 120 and 90/90 positions while the LT muscle activity was nearly silent. CONCLUSION: The standing 90/90 position effectively generated both LT and IS muscle EMG activity while minimizing both UT and MD muscle activity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of oscillation movements under elastic loading can create high muscle activation in the LT muscle without an adverse effect of the humeral head position and scapular rotation.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the optimal exercise intensity and the effects of arm position on elastic resistance exercise. The purpose of this study was to investigate scapular muscle activity in different arm positions utilized during standing elastic resistance exercise. HYPOTHESIS: Lower trapezius (LT), serratus anterior (SA), and infraspinatus (IS) muscle activity will vary across arm positions above shoulder level. Also, oscillation resistance exercise will result in increased muscle activity compared with isometric contraction. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. METHODS: A total of 19 uninjured male collegiate baseball players volunteered to participate in this study. The electromyography (EMG) activity of the LT, upper trapezius (UT), middle deltoid (MD), SA, and IS muscles was determined using surface EMG in 3 arm positions: diagonal pattern 1 (D1), 120° of shoulder abduction (120), and 90° shoulder abduction with external rotation and elbow flexion (90/90) during both isometric contraction and oscillation resistance exercise. RESULTS: No difference in EMG activity of the LT muscle was found between the 120 and 90/90 position. However, the 120 position increased UT and MD muscle activity significantly more than those of the 90/90 position. The D1 arm position significantly increased SA muscle activity more than the 120 and 90/90 positions while the LT muscle activity was nearly silent. CONCLUSION: The standing 90/90 position effectively generated both LT and IS muscle EMG activity while minimizing both UT and MD muscle activity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of oscillation movements under elastic loading can create high muscle activation in the LT muscle without an adverse effect of the humeral head position and scapular rotation.
Authors: Nariyuki Mura; Shawn W O'Driscoll; Mark E Zobitz; Guido Heers; Thomas R Jenkyn; Siaw-Meng Chou; Andreas M Halder; Kai-Nan An Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Ann M Cools; Vincent Dewitte; Frederick Lanszweert; Dries Notebaert; Arne Roets; Barbara Soetens; Barbara Cagnie; Erik E Witvrouw Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2007-07-02 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Alexis A Wright; Eric J Hegedus; Daniel T Tarara; Samantha C Ray; Steven L Dischiavi Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: W Ben Kibler; Paula M Ludewig; Phil W McClure; Lori A Michener; Klaus Bak; Aaron D Sciascia Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 13.800