Literature DB >> 26787441

Aortic valve surgery and survival in patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction.

Zainab Samad1, Amit N Vora2, Allison Dunning3, Phillip J Schulte3, Linda K Shaw3, Fawaz Al-Enezi4, Mads Ersboll5, Robert W McGarrah4, John P Vavalle4, Svati H Shah6, Joseph Kisslo4, Donald Glower7, J Kevin Harrison4, Eric J Velazquez2.   

Abstract

AIMS: We aimed to determine the frequency of aortic valve surgery (AVR) with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), among patients with moderate/severe aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), and its relationship with survival. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The Duke Echocardiographic Database (N = 132 804) was queried for patients with mean gradient ≥25 mmHg and/or peak velocity ≥3 m/s and LVSD (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤50%) from 1 January 1995-28 February 2014. For analyses purposes, AS was defined both by mean gradient and calculated aortic valve area (AVA) criteria. Time-dependent indicators of AVR in multivariable Cox models were used to assess the relationship of AVR and all-cause mortality. A total of 1634 patients had moderate (N = 1090, 67%) or severe (N = 544, 33%) AS by mean gradient criteria. Overall, 287 (26%) patients with moderate AS and 263 (48%) patients with severe AS underwent AVR within 5 years of the qualifying echo. There were 863 (53%) deaths observed up to 5 years following index echo. After multivariable adjustment in an inverse probability weighted regression model, AVR was associated with higher 5-year survival amongst patients with moderate AS and severe AS whether classified by AVA or mean gradient criteria. Over all, AVR ± CABG compared with medical therapy was associated with significantly lower mortality [hazard ratio, HR = 0.49 (0.38, 0.62), P < 0.0001]. Compared with CABG alone, CABG + AVR was associated with better survival [HR = 0.18 (0.12, 0.27), P < 0.0001].
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate/severe AS and LVSD, mortality is substantial and amongst those selected for surgery, AVR with or without CABG is associated with higher survival. Research is required to understand factors contributing to current practice patterns and the possible utility of transcatheter approaches in this high-risk cohort. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2016. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Moderate aortic stenosis; aortic valve surgery; left ventricular systolic dysfunction; severe aortic stenosis; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26787441      PMCID: PMC5841220          DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  44 in total

1.  Ventricular function in aortic stenosis: how low can you go?

Authors:  Blase A Carabello
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-04-17       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Logistic or additive EuroSCORE for high-risk patients?

Authors:  Philippe Michel; Francois Roques; Samer A M Nashef
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Rick A Nishimura; Catherine M Otto; Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; John P Erwin; Robert A Guyton; Patrick T O'Gara; Carlos E Ruiz; Nikolaos J Skubas; Paul Sorajja; Thoralf M Sundt; James D Thomas
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Preoperative identification of patients likely to have left ventricular dysfunction after aortic valve replacement. Participants in the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease.

Authors:  M H Hwang; K E Hammermeister; C Oprian; W Henderson; G Bousvaros; M Wong; D C Miller; E Folland; G Sethi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Dobutamine echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: predicting outcome as a function of management strategy.

Authors:  E Schwammenthal; Z Vered; Y Moshkowitz; B Rabinowitz; Z Ziskind; A K Smolinski; M S Feinberg
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Monin; Jean-Paul Quéré; Mehran Monchi; Hélène Petit; Serge Baleynaud; Christophe Chauvel; Camélia Pop; Patrick Ohlmann; Claude Lelguen; Patrick Dehant; Christophe Tribouilloy; Pascal Guéret
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-30       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis operative risk stratification and long-term outcome: a European multicenter study.

Authors:  Franck Levy; Marcel Laurent; Jean Luc Monin; Jean Michel Maillet; Agnès Pasquet; Thierry Le Tourneau; Hélène Petit-Eisenmann; Mauro Gori; Yannick Jobic; Fabrice Bauer; Christophe Chauvel; Alain Leguerrier; Christophe Tribouilloy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Afterload mismatch in aortic and mitral valve disease: implications for surgical therapy.

Authors:  J Ross
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.

Authors:  James M Brown; Sean M O'Brien; Changfu Wu; Jo Ann H Sikora; Bartley P Griffith; James S Gammie
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: results from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial (cohort A).

Authors:  Sammy Elmariah; Igor F Palacios; Thomas McAndrew; Irene Hueter; Ignacio Inglessis; Joshua N Baker; Susheel Kodali; Martin B Leon; Lars Svensson; Philippe Pibarot; Pamela S Douglas; William F Fearon; Ajay J Kirtane; Hersh S Maniar; Jonathan J Passeri
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 6.546

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in Aortic Valve Stenosis: Low-Flow States Diagnosis, Management, and a Review of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Matthew W Sherwood; Todd L Kiefer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Moderate aortic valve stenosis in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction-insights on prognosis and the potential role of early aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Chetan P Huded; Milind Y Desai
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Outcomes with moderate aortic stenosis and impaired left ventricular function: prelude to a randomized trial?

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Rachel M Easterwood; Ian C Bostock; Jock N McCullough
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Exploratory assessment of left ventricular strain-volume loops in severe aortic valve diseases.

Authors:  Hugo G Hulshof; Arie P van Dijk; Keith P George; Maria T E Hopman; Dick H J Thijssen; David L Oxborough
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Evolving Indications of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement-Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Going.

Authors:  Jules Mesnier; Vassili Panagides; Jorge Nuche; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 6.  The contemporary role of echocardiography in the assessment and management of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Takeshi Kitai; Rayji S Tsutsui
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 7.  Imaging of Valvular Heart Disease in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Tomaz Podlesnikar; Victoria Delgado; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2018-08

8.  The challenge of co-existent moderate aortic stenosis and left ventricular systolic impairment.

Authors:  Russell J Everett; Marc R Dweck; Nicholas L M Cruden
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Discordant severity criteria in patients with moderate aortic stenosis: prognostic implications.

Authors:  Stephan M Pio; Mohammed R Amanullah; Steele C Butcher; Kenny Y Sin; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Philippe Pibarot; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Zee Pin Ding; Philippe Généreux; Martin B Leon; See Hooi Ewe; Victoria Delgado; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-06

Review 10.  Moderate Aortic Stenosis: What is it and When Should We Intervene?

Authors:  Sveeta Badiani; Sanjeev Bhattacharyya; Nikoo Aziminia; Thomas A Treibel; Guy Lloyd
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.