| Literature DB >> 31980934 |
Christine Veith1, Dariusch Neghabian1, Himal Luitel1, Jochen Wilhelm1, Bakytbek Egemnazarov2, Caja Muntanjohl1, Jan-Hendrik Fischer1, Bhola Kumar Dahal1, Ralph Theo Schermuly1, Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani1, Friedrich Grimminger1, Ludger Fink1, Grazyna Kwapiszewska3, Norbert Weissmann4, Akylbek Sydykov5.
Abstract
AIMS: The cytoskeletal signaling protein four and-a-half LIM domains 1 (FHL-1) has recently been identified as a novel key player in pulmonary hypertension as well as in left heart diseases. In this regard, FHL-1 has been implicated in dysregulated hypertrophic signaling in pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells leading to pulmonary hypertension. In mice, FHL-1-deficiency (FHL-1-/-) led to an attenuated hypertrophic signaling associated with a blunted hypertrophic response of the pressure-overloaded left ventricle (LV). However, the role of FHL-1 in right heart hypertrophy has not yet been addressed. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Cytoskeletal proteins; Four and-a-half LIM domain 1 protein; Pressure overload; Pulmonary arterial banding; Right ventricular hypertrophy
Year: 2020 PMID: 31980934 PMCID: PMC6981327 DOI: 10.1007/s00395-019-0767-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Basic Res Cardiol ISSN: 0300-8428 Impact factor: 17.165
Fig. 1Changes in FHL-1 expression after PAB. a Real-time PCR analysis of FHL-1 expression in right ventricles of C57/BL6 mice after sham or PAB for 7, 14 or 21 days (d). Data were analyzed by analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s multiple-to-one comparison post hoc tests and are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). *Significant differences between sham and PAB; ns not significantly different. b Left: representative Western blot analysis of FHL-1 expression in right ventricles of C57/BL6 mice after sham or PAB. Right: densitometric analysis. Data were normalized to β-tubulin and sham was set to 100%. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s multiple-to-one comparison post hoc tests and are presented as mean ± SEM. c Immunohistochemical staining of FHL-1 (in red) after sham or PAB in C57/BL6 mice. NC isotype control staining. d Immunofluorescence staining of α-actinin (in red) and FHL-1 (in green) after 7 days of PAB in C57/BL6 mice. Nuclear staining was performed with DAPI (blue)
Fig. 2Hypertrophic signaling following PAB. a Left: representative Western blot analysis of Akt and Erk phosphorylation in right ventricles of C57/BL6 mice after sham or PAB for 7, 14 or 21 days (d). Right: densitometric analysis of Akt and Erk phosphorylation. Data were normalized to β-tubulin and sham was set to 100%. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s multiple-to-one comparison post hoc tests and are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). b Immunohistochemical staining of PCNA (in red) in C57/BL6 mice after sham or PAB. NC isotype control staining. Arrows indicate PCNA-positive nuclei
In vivo echocardiographic assessment of cardiac size and function in WT and FHL-1−/− mice following 5 weeks of TAC
| WT ( | Fhl-1−/− ( | |
|---|---|---|
| BW (g) | 32.19 ± 0.63 | 30.68 ± 1.18 |
| HR (bpm) | 535.1 ± 8.0 | 574.2 ± 7.7* |
| (LV+S)/TL | 6.0 ± 0.14 | 5.03 ± 0.14* |
| IVSd (mm) | 0.94 ± 0.02 | 0.82 ± 0.02* |
| LVIDd (mm) | 4.01 ± 0.10 | 3.76 ± 0.10 |
| LVIDs (mm) | 2.80 ± 0.12 | 2.34 ± 0.05* |
| LVPWd (mm) | 0.92 ± 0.02 | 0.82 ± 0.02* |
| LV FS | 30.72 ± 1.11 | 38.07 ± 0.78* |
Data were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc tests and are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM)
BW body weight, HR heart rate, (LV + S)/TL (left ventricle + septum)/tibia length, LVSd end-diastolic interventricular septum thickness, LVIDd LV internal diameter at end-diastole, LVIDs LV internal diameter at end-systole, LVPWd LV posterior wall thickness at end-diastole, LV FS left ventricular fractional shortening
*Significant differences. WT, n = 10; FHL-1−/−, n = 6
Fig. 3PAB-induced echocardiographic changes in WT Swiss and FHL-1−/− mice. a Western blot analysis of FHL-1 expression in right ventricles derived from WT Swiss and FHL-1−/− mice. b Right ventricular internal diameter (RVID) after sham or PAB for 3 days (d) or 1, 3 or 5 weeks in WT and FHL-1−/− mice. c Right ventricular wall thickness (RVWT). d Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). *Significant differences between WT PAB and FHL-1−/− PAB. $Significant differences between sham and PAB. #Interaction. Data were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc tests and are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM)
Fig. 4PAB-induced hemodynamic and right ventricular morphological changes in WT Swiss and FHL-1−/− mice. a Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) after sham or PAB for 3 days (d) or 1, 3 or 5 weeks in WT and FHL-1−/− mice. b Systolic arterial pressure (SAP). c Mean arterial pressure (MAP). d Ratio of right ventricle to tibia length. $Significant differences between sham and PAB. #Interaction. Data were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc tests and are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM)
Fig. 5PAB-induced hemodynamic changes in WT Swiss and FHL-1−/− mice. a Right ventricular end-diastolic pressure (RVEDP) after sham or PAB for 3 days (d) or 1, 3 or 5 weeks in WT and FHL-1−/− mice. b Contractility index. c Maximal changes in blood pressure during isovolumetric contraction (max dP/dT). d Minimal changes in blood pressure (min dP/dT). e Tau, time constant of RV relaxation. *Significant differences between WT PAB and FHL-1−/− PAB. $Significant differences between sham and PAB. #Interaction. Data were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc tests and are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM)
Fig. 6PAB-induced right ventricular remodeling in WT Swiss and FHL-1−/− mice. a Representative pictures of sirius red in picric acid staining to detect fibrotic changes (in red) after sham or PAB for 7 days in WT and FHL-1−/− mice. b Quantification of right ventricular fibrosis after sham or PAB for 3 days (d) or 1, 3 or 5 weeks in WT and FHL-1−/− mice. c Representative pictures of FITC conjugated wheat germ agglutinin (WGA FITC; in green) staining to determine cell size. d Quantification of cardiomyocyte size depicted by cross-sectional area. e Representative pictures of FITC conjugated wheat germ agglutinin (WGA FITC; in green) and IB4-TRITC (in red) staining to determine cell size and number of capillaries. Nuclear staining was performed with DAPI (blue). f Quantification of number of capillaries to cardiomyocytes. *Significant differences between WT PAB and FHL-1−/− PAB. $Significant differences between sham and PAB. #Interaction. Data were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey´s multiple comparison post hoc tests and are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM)
Fig. 7Changes in gene expression after PAB in WT Swiss and FHL-1−/− mice. a Ventricular wall stress markers, left: Anp and right: Bnp after sham or PAB for 3 days (d) or 1, 3 or 5 weeks. n = 4–6 each. b Ca2+-handling proteins, left: Plb, middle: Atp2a2 and right: Ryr. n = 4–6 each. c Fetal genes, left: α-Mhc, middle: β-Mhc and right: β-Mhc/α-Mhc ratio. d Collagens, left: collagen 1a1, middle: collagen 1a2 and right: collagen 3a1. e FHL-2. $Significant differences between sham and PAB. Data were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey´s multiple comparison post hoc tests and are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). f Western blot analysis of Erk and Akt phosphorylation in right ventricles of WT and FHL-1−/− mice after 3 weeks of PAB