Literature DB >> 26691853

Static endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: Transoral endoscopy during clinical swallow evaluations.

James A Curtis1, Joey Laus2, Katherine C Yung2, Mark S Courey2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the sensitivity and specificity for assessing pharyngeal residue, laryngeal penetration, and tracheal aspiration when comparing findings from the Static Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (SEES) with findings from the Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study (VFSS).
METHODS: Retrospective study at a tertiary academic medical center. Records were reviewed consecutive outpatients who underwent both SEES and VFSS evaluations. Video segments from SEES and VFSS examinations were blindly judged by experienced clinicians on a categorical/ordinal rating form for the absence, quantitative presence, and location of postswallow residue, penetration, and aspiration. Statistical analysis was performed to identify intra- and interrater reliability and correlation between SEES and VFSS findings.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were identified who met the above inclusion criteria, for a total of 206 video segments. Inter- and intrarater reliability was judged by Cronbach's alpha to be good to excellent. SEES findings revealed statistically significant correlations with VFSS findings (P < 0.001) with the absence, quantitative presence, and location of thin liquid and solid swallow residue, penetration, and aspiration. In addition, SEES was more sensitive to the presence of liquid residue, penetration, and aspiration than VFSS.
CONCLUSION: SEES is an endoscopic screening procedure that strengthens the clinical swallowing evaluation by documenting the presence or absence of postswallow residue, penetration, and aspiration. Accurate identification of a patient's risk for aspiration helps to direct further workup. It is an expedient, repeatable, and clinical relevant procedure that can be easily incorporated into a clinician's practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 126:2291-2294, 2016.
© 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rigid; clinical swallow evaluation; dysphagia; endoscopy; swallowing; transoral; videofluoroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26691853      PMCID: PMC4916032          DOI: 10.1002/lary.25828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  21 in total

1.  Validation of the 3-oz water swallow test for aspiration following stroke.

Authors:  K L DePippo; M A Holas; M J Reding
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1992-12

2.  Effect of Lidocaine on Swallowing During FEES in Patients With Dysphagia.

Authors:  Meredith B O'Dea; Susan E Langmore; Gintas P Krisciunas; Michael Walsh; Linsey L Zanchetti; Rebecca Scheel; Edel McNally; Asako Satoh Kaneoka; Anthony J Guarino; Susan G Butler
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Sensitivity and specificity of clinical/bedside examination signs for detecting aspiration in adults subsequent to stroke.

Authors:  G H McCullough; R T Wertz; J C Rosenbek
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2001 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 4.  The modified barium swallow and the functional endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.

Authors:  Susan Brady; Joseph Donzelli
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Role of videoendoscopy in assessment of pharyngeal function in oropharyngeal dysphagia: comparison with videofluoroscopy and manometry.

Authors:  S Périé; L Laccourreye; A Flahault; V Hazebroucq; S Chaussade; J L St Guily
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity?

Authors:  A M Kelly; P Leslie; T Beale; C Payten; M J Drinnan
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.597

7.  The probability of correctly predicting subglottic penetration from clinical observations.

Authors:  P Linden; K V Kuhlemeier; C Patterson
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Dysphagia: predicting laryngeal penetration.

Authors:  P Linden; A A Siebens
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare?

Authors:  Annette M Kelly; Michael J Drinnan; Paula Leslie
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Utility of clinical swallowing examination measures for detecting aspiration post-stroke.

Authors:  G H McCullough; J C Rosenbek; R T Wertz; S McCoy; G Mann; K McCullough
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  6 in total

1.  Oropharyngeal swallowing functions are impaired in patients with naive-achalasia.

Authors:  Sezgin Baha; Eyigor Sibel; Durusoy Duygu; Karaoguz Ezgi; Kirazli Tayfun; Bor Serhat
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Psychometric Properties of Visuoperceptual Measures of Videofluoroscopic and Fibre-Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katina Swan; Reinie Cordier; Ted Brown; Renée Speyer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 3.  A brief history of topographical anatomy.

Authors:  Susan Standring
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  The effect of "xanthan gum-based fluid thickener" on hydration, swallowing functions and nutritional status in total maxillectomy patients.

Authors:  Baha Sezgin; Duygu Durusoy; Meltem Sezis Demirci; Kerem Ozturk; Isa Kaya; Sibel Eyigor; Sercan Gode
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES): A Standardized Approach to Rating Pharyngeal Residue, Penetration, and Aspiration During FEES.

Authors:  James A Curtis; James C Borders; Sarah E Perry; Avery E Dakin; Zeina N Seikaly; Michelle S Troche
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Predictive values of static endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in adults.

Authors:  Joseph Chang; Sarah K Brown; Chaewon Hwang; Diana N Kirke; Leanne Goldberg
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.