Literature DB >> 31980888

Oropharyngeal swallowing functions are impaired in patients with naive-achalasia.

Sezgin Baha1, Eyigor Sibel2, Durusoy Duygu3, Karaoguz Ezgi4, Kirazli Tayfun3, Bor Serhat4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that achalasia is limited to the pathology of the esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter. However, patients with achalasia still have symptoms such as aspiration and weight loss after even a succesfull treatment, suggesting that additional oropharyngeal pathologies may be frequent in patients with achalasia.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the oropharyngeal/hypopharyngeal swallowing functions of patients with naive-achalasia.
METHODS: We evaluated the oropharyngeal functions with fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and high-resolution manometry (HRM) in 36 patients with naive-achalasia(mean age 47.8 ± 14.7; 20F, 20M) diagnosed with and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, HRM, radiology compared the results with 40 healthy volunteers (mean age 48.25 ± 12.37; 23F, 17M) as controls. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) were used for psychological analysis and to assess quality of life.
RESULTS: Mean integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) values were significantly higher (12.7 ± 10.9) for all patients compared to controls (0 ± 4.40). In the presence of pharyngeal residue IRP was 18.6 ± 11.8 mmHg compare to patients without pharyngeal residue which was 7.2 ± 6.4 mmHg (p < 0.05). Resting pressures were 105.7 ± 60.4 mmHg in study group vs 116 ± 55.1 mmHg in the control group (NS). In the study group we determined that residues of semisolid and liquid food were significantly higher in the vallecula, retrocricoid region, pharyngeal wall, and piriform sinuses with FEES. The average MDADI score was 58.1 ± 19.8 and 87.6 ± 10.7 in the study and control groups, respectively (p < 0.05). Depression may be significantly higher in achalasia patients based on the BDI.
CONCLUSION: Relaxation of the upper esophageal sphincter is insufficient especially in patient with residue. This finding is supported by the presence of residue during FEES evaluation. In the assessment of patients with achalasia, in the presence of residue symptoms,oropharyngeal phases of swallowing should be examined with FEES. Furthermore, the effect of exercises to improve the pathological findings should be evaluated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achalasia; Deglutition disorders; Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing; High-resolution manometry; Oropharyngeal dysphagia; Swallowing disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31980888     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-05800-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  29 in total

1.  Pulmonary complications of cardiospasm.

Authors:  H A ANDERSEN; C B HOLMAN; A M OLSEN
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1953-02-21

Review 2.  Achalasia: current treatment options.

Authors:  Pietro Familiari; Santi Greco; Ance Volkanovska; Giovanni Gigante; Anna Cali; Ivo Boškoski; Guido Costamagna
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.869

3.  Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients.

Authors:  Michael A Crary; Giselle D Carnaby Mann; Michael E Groher
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Primary surgical treatment for esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  D B Effler; F D Loop; L K Groves; R G Favaloro
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1971-06

Review 5.  Accuracy of endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing for oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Authors:  Luis Fernando Giraldo-Cadavid; Lorena Renata Leal-Leaño; Guillermo Alfredo Leon-Basantes; Alirio Rodrigo Bastidas; Rafael Garcia; Sergio Ovalle; Jorge E Abondano-Garavito
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 6.  Current diagnosis and management of achalasia.

Authors:  An Moonen; Guy Boeckxstaens
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 7.  A functional outcome swallowing scale for staging oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Authors:  J R Salassa
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.404

8.  High-Resolution Manometry Evaluation of the Pharynx and Upper Esophageal Sphincter Motility in Patients with Achalasia.

Authors:  Mariano A Menezes; Fernando A M Herbella; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Clinical, radiological, and manometric profile in 145 patients with untreated achalasia.

Authors:  Piero M Fisichella; Dan Raz; Francesco Palazzo; Ian Niponmick; Marco G Patti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Failed Deglutitive Upper Esophageal Sphincter Relaxation Is a Risk Factor for Aspiration in Stroke Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.

Authors:  Taeheon Lee; Jung Ho Park; Chongil Sohn; Kyung Jae Yoon; Yong-Taek Lee; Jung Hwan Park; Il Seok Jung
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.