Literature DB >> 30019178

Psychometric Properties of Visuoperceptual Measures of Videofluoroscopic and Fibre-Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.

Katina Swan1, Reinie Cordier2, Ted Brown3, Renée Speyer2,4,5.   

Abstract

Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) and Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies (VFSS) are instrumental assessments of dysphagia which provide videos of the internal structures of swallowing. They are commonly regarded as 'gold-standard' assessments; however, there is no consensus regarding a gold-standard measure to analyse the video recordings that they produce. Measures require sound psychometric properties to be suitable for clinical or research purposes. To date, no review of psychometric properties of FEES and VFSS measures has been undertaken or formally reported. This review assessed the quality of the psychometric properties of visuoperceptual measures of FEES and VFSS. Electronic databases were searched for studies reporting on psychometric qualities of visuoperceptual measures which are used to analyse recordings from FEES and VFSS. All dates until February 2017 were included. The Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to evaluate the methodical quality of studies. The measures' overall quality was then assessed by combining COSMIN ratings with quality criteria. Forty-five studies, reporting on 39 measures, met the inclusion criteria for this review. Data about the measures' psychometric properties were very limited. Twenty-one measures had information available about reliability only, while 18 had information on up to five of the possible nine psychometric properties categorised within the COSMIN framework. The majority of the FEES and VFSS measures' psychometric properties were rated as 'indeterminate' overall, due to the small number of studies, issues with design, statistical analyses, and reporting practices of extant studies. There is insufficient evidence to recommend any individual measure included in this review as valid and reliable to interpret VFSS and FEES recordings. Further research, which utilises robust methodological design and reporting, is needed to examine the psychometric properties of measures for FEES and VFSS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deglutition; Dysphagia; Fibre-endoscopic evaluations of swallowing; Measure; Psychometrics; Videofluoroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30019178     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-018-9918-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  82 in total

1.  Reliability of the pharyngeal squeeze maneuver.

Authors:  Kimsey H Rodriguez; Carole R Roth; Catherine J Rees; Peter C Belafsky
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Comparison of clinician judgments and measurements of swallow response time: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Michael P Karnell; Nicole M Rogus
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  The bedside examination in dysphagia.

Authors:  Giselle Carnaby-Mann; Kerry Lenius
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.784

4.  Subjective Assessment of Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies.

Authors:  Janet W Lee; Derrick R Randall; Lisa M Evangelista; Maggie A Kuhn; Peter C Belafsky
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in the Netherlands: a telephone survey.

Authors:  Berit Kertscher; Renée Speyer; Eric Fong; Anastasios M Georgiou; Moira Smith
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Swallowing disorders following acute stroke: prevalence and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  G Mann; G J Hankey; D Cameron
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.762

7.  Prevalence and symptom profiling of oropharyngeal dysphagia in a community dwelling of an elderly population: a self-reporting questionnaire survey.

Authors:  G Holland; V Jayasekeran; N Pendleton; M Horan; M Jones; S Hamdy
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 8.  Pediatric Dysphagia: Physiology, Assessment, and Management.

Authors:  Pamela Dodrill; Memorie M Gosa
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.374

9.  Interrater reliability of videofluoroscopic swallow evaluation.

Authors:  Sandro J Stoeckli; Thierry A G M Huisman; Burkhardt Seifert; Bonnie J W Martin-Harris
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) for neurogenic dysphagia: training curriculum of the German Society of Neurology and the German stroke society.

Authors:  Rainer Dziewas; Jörg Glahn; Christine Helfer; Guntram Ickenstein; Jochen Keller; Christian Ledl; Beate Lindner-Pfleghar; Darius G Nabavi; Mario Prosiegel; Axel Riecker; Sriramya Lapa; Sönke Stanschus; Tobias Warnecke; Otto Busse
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  19 in total

1.  European white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Laura W J Baijens; Margaret Walshe; Leena-Maija Aaltonen; Christoph Arens; Reinie Cordier; Patrick Cras; Lise Crevier-Buchman; Chris Curtis; Wojciech Golusinski; Roganie Govender; Jesper Grau Eriksen; Kevin Hansen; Kate Heathcote; Markus M Hess; Sefik Hosal; Jens Peter Klussmann; C René Leemans; Denise MacCarthy; Beatrice Manduchi; Jean-Paul Marie; Reza Nouraei; Claire Parkes; Christina Pflug; Walmari Pilz; Julie Regan; Nathalie Rommel; Antonio Schindler; Annemie M W J Schols; Renee Speyer; Giovanni Succo; Irene Wessel; Anna C H Willemsen; Taner Yilmaz; Pere Clavé
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Prevalence of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Adults in Different Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.

Authors:  Maribeth Caya Rivelsrud; Lena Hartelius; Liza Bergström; Marianne Løvstad; Renée Speyer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 3.  Links Between Swallowing and Consciousness: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Evelyne Mélotte; Audrey Maudoux; Rajanikant Panda; Jean-François Kaux; Aude Lagier; Roxanne Herr; Marion Belorgeot; Steven Laureys; Olivia Gosseries
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Dysphagia Presentation, Airway Invasion, and Gender Differences in a Clinically Based Sample of People with Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Matthew Dumican; Christopher Watts; Teresa Drulia; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Accuracy of High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry Metrics for Predicting Aspiration and Residue in Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Patients with Poor Pharyngeal Contractility.

Authors:  Howell Henrian G Bayona; Nicole Pizzorni; Jan Tack; Ann Goeleven; Taher Omari; Nathalie Rommel
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Refining measurement of swallowing safety in the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) criteria: Validation of DIGEST version 2.

Authors:  Katherine A Hutcheson; Carly E A Barbon; Clare P Alvarez; Carla L Warneke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Establishment of a Multi-parameter Evaluation Model for Risk of Aspiration in Dysphagia: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jing Song; Qin Wan; Yongli Wang; Huichang Zhou
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 8.  Frequency and associated factors for swallowing impairment in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rafaela Soares Rech; Bárbara Niegia Garcia de Goulart; Karoline Weber Dos Santos; Miriam Allein Zago Marcolino; Juliana Balbinot Hilgert
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.481

9.  Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES): A Standardized Approach to Rating Pharyngeal Residue, Penetration, and Aspiration During FEES.

Authors:  James A Curtis; James C Borders; Sarah E Perry; Avery E Dakin; Zeina N Seikaly; Michelle S Troche
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 10.  Best Practices in Modified Barium Swallow Studies.

Authors:  Bonnie Martin-Harris; Cheri L Canon; Heather Shaw Bonilha; Joseph Murray; Kate Davidson; Maureen A Lefton-Greif
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.