Literature DB >> 33837841

Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES): A Standardized Approach to Rating Pharyngeal Residue, Penetration, and Aspiration During FEES.

James A Curtis1, James C Borders2, Sarah E Perry2,3,4,5, Avery E Dakin2, Zeina N Seikaly2, Michelle S Troche2.   

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to describe the development of the Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES)-a standardized method to rate pharyngeal residue, penetration, and aspiration during FEES. As a secondary aim, we explored the feasibility of training novices to interpret FEES using VASES. Literature review and consensus panel discussions were used to develop standardized rules for VASES. A training protocol was developed and criterion ratings were established. Twenty-five novice raters completed VASES training and pre-/post-training assessments. Statistical analyses were used to examine pre- to post-training differences in the accuracy, reliability, and time to rate each video clip using VASES. Four sets of VASES rules were developed, including 'what', 'where', 'when', and 'how' to rate FEES. Large, significant post-training improvements in rating accuracy were observed across all seven VASES outcome measures (Cohen's d range 0.74-1.59). Additionally, inter-rater reliability increased for four of the seven outcome measures, and the amount of time to rate each video clip decreased from 2.6 min pre-training to 1.5 min post-training. VASES is a standardized FEES rating method used to enhance the subjective analysis of pharyngeal residue, penetration, and aspiration. It can be feasibly taught to novice raters with a high level of success and may be an effective method to analyze swallowing safety and efficiency in clinical and research practices. Future research is needed to test the validity of VASES by examining its relationship with other validated FEES rating scales.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aspiration; Dysphagia; Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES); Residue; Visual analysis of swallowing efficiency and safety (VASES)

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33837841     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-021-10293-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  59 in total

Review 1.  Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.

Authors:  Susan G Hiss; Gregory N Postma
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Comparing videofluoroscopy and endoscopy to assess swallowing in bottle-fed young infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Erika S Armstrong; Jenny Reynolds; Sandra Carroll; Chrysty Sturdivant; Mustafa S Suterwala
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 3.  History of Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Evaluation and Management of Pharyngeal Dysphagia: Changes over the Years.

Authors:  Susan E Langmore
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity?

Authors:  A M Kelly; P Leslie; T Beale; C Payten; M J Drinnan
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.597

5.  Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure.

Authors:  S E Langmore; K Schatz; N Olsen
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Chronic aspiration and laryngeal competence.

Authors:  K Bevan; M V Griffiths
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.469

7.  Exploring the utility of fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in young children- A comparison with videofluoroscopy.

Authors:  Jayanthy Pavithran; Indu Vadakke Puthiyottil; Madhumita Kumar; Anju Viswambharan Nikitha; Sivakumar Vidyadharan; Renjitha Bhaskaran; Arya Chandrababu Jaya; Krishnakumar Thankappan; Iyer Subramania; K R Sundaram
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 1.675

8.  Static endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: Transoral endoscopy during clinical swallow evaluations.

Authors:  James A Curtis; Joey Laus; Katherine C Yung; Mark S Courey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing and aspiration.

Authors:  S E Langmore; K Schatz; N Olson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Comparison between videofluoroscopy, fiberoptic endoscopy and scintigraphy for diagnosis of oro-pharyngeal dysphagia.

Authors:  B Fattori; P Giusti; V Mancini; M Grosso; M R Barillari; L Bastiani; S Molinaro; A Nacci
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.124

View more
  2 in total

1.  Translating Ultrasound into Clinical Practice for the Assessment of Swallowing and Laryngeal Function: A Speech and Language Pathology-Led Consensus Study.

Authors:  Jodi E Allen; Gemma Clunie; Joan K-Y Ma; Margaret Coffey; Katharina Winiker; Sally Richmond; Soren Y Lowell; Anna Volkmer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.733

2.  Reliability and Construct Validity of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale: Performance on Videos and Effect of Bolus Consistency.

Authors:  Sara Rocca; Nicole Pizzorni; Nadia Valenza; Luca Negri; Antonio Schindler
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.