Literature DB >> 33159279

Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Masses on Breast DCE-MRI Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network with Bayesian Optimization.

Akiyoshi Hizukuri1, Ryohei Nakayama2, Mayumi Nara3, Megumi Suzuki3, Kiyoshi Namba3.   

Abstract

Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a higher sensitivity of early breast cancer than mammography, the specificity is lower. The purpose of this study was to develop a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast masses on dynamic contrast material-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) by using a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) with Bayesian optimization. Our database consisted of 56 DCE-MRI examinations for 56 patients, each of which contained five sequential phase images. It included 26 benign and 30 malignant masses. In this study, we first determined a baseline DCNN model from well-known DCNN models in terms of classification performance. The optimum architecture of the DCNN model was determined by changing the hyperparameters of the baseline DCNN model such as the number of layers, the filter size, and the number of filters using Bayesian optimization. As the input of the proposed DCNN model, rectangular regions of interest which include an entire mass were selected from each of DCE-MRI images by an experienced radiologist. Three-fold cross validation method was used for training and testing of the proposed DCNN model. The classification accuracy, the sensitivity, the specificity, the positive predictive value, and the negative predictive value were 92.9% (52/56), 93.3% (28/30), 92.3% (24/26), 93.3% (28/30), and 92.3% (24/26), respectively. These results were substantially greater than those with the conventional method based on handcrafted features and a classifier. The proposed DCNN model achieved high classification performance and would be useful in differential diagnoses of masses in breast DCE-MRI images as a diagnostic aid.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian optimization; Breast magnetic resonance imaging; Computer-aided diagnosis; Deep convolutional neural network; Mass

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33159279      PMCID: PMC7886934          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-020-00394-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  29 in total

1.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Masses in Breast DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Emi Honda; Ryohei Nakayama; Hitoshi Koyama; Akiyoshi Yamashita
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for identifying histological classification of clustered microcalcifications by use of follow-up magnification mammograms.

Authors:  Ryohei Nakayama; Ryoji Watanabe; Kiyoshi Namba; Kan Takeda; Koji Yamamoto; Shigehiko Katsuragawa; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential.

Authors:  Kunio Doi
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; R Edward Hendrick; Martin J Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Jean B Cormack; Lucy A Hanna; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence W Bassett; Carl J D'Orsi; Roberta A Jong; Murray Rebner; Anna N A Tosteson; Constantine A Gatsonis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  ROC methodology in radiologic imaging.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).

Authors:  M O Leach; C R M Boggis; A K Dixon; D F Easton; R A Eeles; D G R Evans; F J Gilbert; I Griebsch; R J C Hoff; P Kessar; S R Lakhani; S M Moss; A Nerurkar; A R Padhani; L J Pointon; D Thompson; R M L Warren
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 21-27       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Jeffrey D Blume; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Etta D Pisano; Roberta A Jong; W Phil Evans; Marilyn J Morton; Mary C Mahoney; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Richard G Barr; Dione M Farria; Helga S Marques; Karan Boparai
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Self-referred mammography patients: analysis of patients' characteristics.

Authors:  H E Reynolds; V P Jackson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Three-Class Mammogram Classification Based on Descriptive CNN Features.

Authors:  M Mohsin Jadoon; Qianni Zhang; Ihsan Ul Haq; Sharjeel Butt; Adeel Jadoon
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Oncology: Towards the Establishment of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Ryuji Hamamoto; Kruthi Suvarna; Masayoshi Yamada; Kazuma Kobayashi; Norio Shinkai; Mototaka Miyake; Masamichi Takahashi; Shunichi Jinnai; Ryo Shimoyama; Akira Sakai; Ken Takasawa; Amina Bolatkan; Kanto Shozu; Ai Dozen; Hidenori Machino; Satoshi Takahashi; Ken Asada; Masaaki Komatsu; Jun Sese; Syuzo Kaneko
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Development and validation of a deep learning model for breast lesion segmentation and characterization in multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Jingjin Zhu; Jiahui Geng; Wei Shan; Boya Zhang; Huaqing Shen; Xiaohan Dong; Mei Liu; Xiru Li; Liuquan Cheng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Prediction of Radiation-Related Dental Caries Through PyRadiomics Features and Artificial Neural Network on Panoramic Radiography.

Authors:  Vanessa De Araujo Faria; Mehran Azimbagirad; Gustavo Viani Arruda; Juliana Fernandes Pavoni; Joaquim Cezar Felipe; Elza Maria Carneiro Mendes Ferreira Dos Santos; Luiz Otavio Murta Junior
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.903

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.