Literature DB >> 10410164

Accuracy of MR imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions: a diagnostic meta-analysis.

J M Hrung1, S S Sonnad, J S Schwartz, C P Langlotz.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The authors performed a systematic, critical review of the literature on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for primary breast cancer detection in patients with suspicious breast lesions, analyzed MR test performance in the articles meeting study criteria, and used this information to examine the cost-effectiveness of preoperative MR imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured, predefined MEDLINE search was conducted to identify potentially relevant, peer-reviewed, English-language references from January 1996 through August 1997 on the diagnostic accuracy of breast MR imaging. This information was supplemented by manually searching bibliographies of the retrieved articles for additional potentially relevant references. All studies were independently abstracted by two reviewers using a prospectively designed worksheet. Abstraction results were analyzed with the summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method.
RESULTS: Of 41 identified studies, 16 met the inclusion criteria. These studies reported sensitivities ranging from 63% to 100% and specificities ranging from 21% to 100%. Maximum joint sensitivity and specificity of the summary ROC curve was 89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82%, 93%). At a sensitivity of 95%, specificity was 67%. When test performance values were applied to a previous cost-effectiveness analysis, the cost-effectiveness of preoperative MR imaging relative to that of excisional biopsy was confirmed, but its cost-effectiveness relative to that of needle core biopsy varied widely.
CONCLUSION: For MR imaging to be a cost-effective alternative to excisional biopsy for diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions, its diagnostic test performance must be equal to or better than the best results in recently published studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10410164     DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(99)80189-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  11 in total

1.  The added value of quantitative multi-voxel MR spectroscopy in breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M D Dorrius; R M Pijnappel; M C van der Weide Jansen; L Jansen; P Kappert; M Oudkerk; P E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Masses in Breast DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Emi Honda; Ryohei Nakayama; Hitoshi Koyama; Akiyoshi Yamashita
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on surgical treatment and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Kaoru Itakura; Juan Lessing; Theadora Sakata; Amy Heinzerling; Eline Vriens; Dorota Wisner; Michael Alvarado; Laura Esserman; Cheryl Ewing; Nola Hylton; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Monique D Dorrius; Hildebrand Dijkstra; Matthijs Oudkerk; Paul E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  MRI in the differential diagnosis of primary architectural distortion detected by mammography.

Authors:  Lifang Si; Renyou Zhai; Xiaojuan Liu; Kaiyan Yang; Li Wang; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  Invasive breast cancer: correlation of dynamic MR features with prognostic factors.

Authors:  Botond K Szabó; Peter Aspelin; Maria Kristoffersen Wiberg; Tibor Tot; Beata Boné
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-07-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Breast magnetic resonance imaging as a problem-solving modality in mammographic BI-RADS 3 lesions.

Authors:  M D Dorrius; R M Pijnappel; M C Jansen-van der Weide; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 8.  Computer-aided detection in breast MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Monique D Dorrius; Marijke C Jansen-van der Weide; Peter M A van Ooijen; Ruud M Pijnappel; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  The added diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at 3.0 T in nonpalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  Laura G Merckel; Helena M Verkooijen; Nicky H G M Peters; Ritse M Mann; Wouter B Veldhuis; Remmert K Storm; Teun Weits; Katya M Duvivier; Thijs van Dalen; Willem P Th M Mali; Petra H M Peeters; Maurice A A J van den Bosch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Breast MRI in nonpalpable breast lesions: a randomized trial with diagnostic and therapeutic outcome - MONET - study.

Authors:  Nicky H G M Peters; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Willem P T M Mali; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Remmert K Storm; Peter W Plaisier; Erwin de Boer; Adriaan J van Overbeeke; Petra H M Peeters
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.