Literature DB >> 22562174

The iPad tablet computer for mobile on-call radiology diagnosis? Auditing discrepancy in CT and MRI reporting.

Sindhu John1, Angeline C C Poh, Tchoyoson C C Lim, Elizabeth H Y Chan, Le Roy Chong.   

Abstract

Tablet computers such as the iPad, which have a large format, improved graphic display resolution and a touch screen interface, may have an advantage compared to existing mobile devices such as smartphones and laptops for viewing radiological images. We assessed their potential for emergency radiology teleconsultation by reviewing multi-image CT and MRI studies on iPad tablet computers compared to Picture Archival and Communication Systems (PACS) workstations. Annonymised DICOM images of 79 CT and nine MRI studies comprising a range of common on-call conditions, reported on full-featured diagnostic PACS workstation by one Reporting Radiologist, were transferred from PACS to three iPad tablet computers running OsiriX HD v 2.02 DICOM software and viewed independently by three reviewing radiologists. Structured documentation was made of major findings (primary diagnosis or other clinically important findings), minor findings (incidental findings), and user feedback. Two hundred and sixty four readings (88 studies read by three reviewing radiologists) were compared, with 3.4 % (nine of 264) major discrepancies and 5.6 % (15 of 264) minor discrepancies. All reviewing radiologists reported favorable user experience but noted issues with software stability and limitations of image manipulation tools. Our results suggest that emergency conditions commonly encountered on CT and MRI can be diagnosed using tablet computers with good agreement with dedicated PACS workstations. Shortcomings in software and application design should be addressed if the potential of tablet computers for mobile teleradiology is to be fully realized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22562174      PMCID: PMC3447096          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9485-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  16 in total

1.  A demonstration of instant pocket wireless CT teleradiology to facilitate stat neurosurgical consultation and future telemedicine implications.

Authors:  L G Yamamoto; D R Williams
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Handheld device review of abdominal CT for the evaluation of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Asim F Choudhri; Thomas M Carr; Christopher P Ho; James R Stone; Spencer B Gay; Drew L Lambert
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) interpretation: discrepancy rates among experienced radiologists.

Authors:  Hani H Abujudeh; Giles W Boland; Rathachai Kaewlai; Pavel Rabiner; Elkarn F Halpern; G Scott Gazelle; James H Thrall
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Instant wireless transmission of radiological images using a personal digital assistant phone for emergency teleconsultation.

Authors:  Dong-Keun Kim; Sun K Yoo; Sun H Kim
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.184

5.  Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): survey of personal digital assistant use in radiology.

Authors:  William W Boonn; Adam E Flanders
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  PDA-phone-based instant transmission of radiological images over a CDMA network by combining the PACS screen with a Bluetooth-interfaced local wireless link.

Authors:  Dong Keun Kim; Sun K Yoo; Jeong Jin Park; Sun Ho Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  iPhone-based teleradiology for the diagnosis of acute cervico-dorsal spine trauma.

Authors:  Jayesh Modi; Pranshu Sharma; Alex Earl; Mark Simpson; J Ross Mitchell; Mayank Goyal
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Managing errors in radiology: a working model.

Authors:  C Melvin; R Bodley; A Booth; T Meagher; C Record; P Savage
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 9.  Radiology on handheld devices: image display, manipulation, and PACS integration issues.

Authors:  Bhargav Raman; Raghav Raman; Lalithakala Raman; Christopher F Beaulieu
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  Diagnostic efficacy of handheld devices for emergency radiologic consultation.

Authors:  Rachel J Toomey; John T Ryan; Mark F McEntee; Michael G Evanoff; Dev P Chakraborty; Jonathan P McNulty; David J Manning; Edel M Thomas; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  27 in total

1.  iPad-based patient briefing for radiological examinations-a clinical trial.

Authors:  Philipp M Schlechtweg; Matthias Hammon; David Giese; Christian Heberlein; Michael Uder; Siegfried A Schwab
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Radiological interpretation of images displayed on tablet computers: a systematic review.

Authors:  L J Caffery; N R Armfield; A C Smith
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Reliability of diagnosing acute ischemic cerebrovascular on magnetic resonance imaging disorders using iPads.

Authors:  Hidekazu Hattori; Yoshifumi Kuwayama; Yoshitaka Inui; Kazuhiro Murayama; Motoharu Hayakawa; Shinji Ito; Hiroshi Toyama
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Mobile markerless augmented reality and its application in forensic medicine.

Authors:  Thomas Kilgus; Eric Heim; Sven Haase; Sabine Prüfer; Michael Müller; Alexander Seitel; Markus Fangerau; Tamara Wiebe; Justin Iszatt; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Joachim Hornegger; Kathrin Yen; Lena Maier-Hein
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  iPads in Breast Imaging - A Phantom Study.

Authors:  M Hammon; P M Schlechtweg; R Schulz-Wendtland; M Uder; S A Schwab
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  The effect of time in use on the display performance of the iPad.

Authors:  Liam J Caffery; Kenneth L Manthey; Lawrence H Sim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  The Empirical Foundations of Teleradiology and Related Applications: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; James H Thrall; Noura Bashshur
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.536

8.  Mobile Image Interpretation: Diagnostic Performance of CT Exams Displayed on a Tablet Computer in Detecting Abdominopelvic Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Philipp M Schlechtweg; Ferdinand J Kammerer; Hannes Seuss; Michael Uder; Matthias Hammon
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  The reliability of tablet computers in depicting maxillofacial radiographic landmarks.

Authors:  Aditya Tadinada; Mina Mahdian; Sonam Sheth; Taranpreet K Chandhoke; Aadarsh Gopalakrishna; Anitha Potluri; Sumit Yadav
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2015-09-09

10.  Wireless mobile technology to improve workflow and feasibility of MR-guided percutaneous interventions.

Authors:  Martin A Rube; Andrew B Holbrook; Benjamin F Cox; Razvan Buciuc; Andreas Melzer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.