Literature DB >> 15290513

Evaluation of personal digital assistants as an interpretation medium for computed tomography of patients with intracranial injury.

Vahid Yaghmai1, Sivaraja Kuppuswami, Jonathan W Berlin, Sean A Salehi.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the feasibility of using a personal digital assistant (PDA) as a medium for the interpretation of cranial CT scans of trauma patients. Twenty-one noncontrast cranial CT scans were transferred in their entirety to a PDA from the picture archiving and communications system (PACS) utilizing General Electric (GE) PathSpeed PACS Web Server interface and synchronization. All CT scans had been interpreted by board-certified radiologists prior to the study. Seven of the scans demonstrated subarachnoid hemorrhage, seven demonstrated subdural hematomas, and the remaining scans were normal. After transfer to the PDA, all images were separately reviewed in a blinded manner by a radiologist and a neurosurgeon. Images were graded for their quality and diagnostic utility in the evaluation of intracranial hemorrhage. Image quality was categorized as excellent, very good, acceptable for diagnosis, or not acceptable for diagnosis. Based on the radiologic diagnosis, recommendation for surgical management was made by the reviewing neurosurgeon. The accuracy rate for both the radiologist and the neurosurgeon in the detection of intracranial hemorrhage was 95%. There was one false negative which was attributed to error in judgment rather than poor image quality. This diagnostic error did not affect patient management. The sensitivity and specificity for detection of intracranial hemorrhage were 93% and 100%, respectively. Image quality was judged to be excellent in 90% of the cases and very good in the remaining 10%. Our results suggest that the PDA is a robust medium for interpretation of CT scans in patients with suspected hemorrhage following intracranial injury. In this setting, the PDA should be considered for teleradiology purposes.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 15290513     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-003-0300-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  5 in total

1.  Information in the palm of your hand.

Authors:  M Ebell; D Rovner
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Initial experience with a wireless personal digital assistant as a teleradiology terminal for reporting emergency computerized tomography scans.

Authors:  J Reponen; E Ilkko; L Jyrkinen; O Tervonen; J Niinimäki; V Karhula; A Koivula
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.184

3.  A demonstration of instant pocket wireless CT teleradiology to facilitate stat neurosurgical consultation and future telemedicine implications.

Authors:  L G Yamamoto; D R Williams
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.469

Review 4.  Handheld computing in medicine.

Authors:  Sandra Fischer; Thomas E Stewart; Sangeeta Mehta; Randy Wax; Stephen E Lapinsky
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Emergency image transfer system through a mobile telephone in Japan: technical note.

Authors:  Mikito Yamada; Hirotaka Watarai; Takashi Andou; Noboru Sakai
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.654

  5 in total
  10 in total

1.  PDA-phone-based instant transmission of radiological images over a CDMA network by combining the PACS screen with a Bluetooth-interfaced local wireless link.

Authors:  Dong Keun Kim; Sun K Yoo; Jeong Jin Park; Sun Ho Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  The iPad tablet computer for mobile on-call radiology diagnosis? Auditing discrepancy in CT and MRI reporting.

Authors:  Sindhu John; Angeline C C Poh; Tchoyoson C C Lim; Elizabeth H Y Chan; Le Roy Chong
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Mobile devices and their prospective future role in emergency radiology.

Authors:  Timothy W O'Connell; Michael N Patlas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Diagnostic efficacy of handheld devices for emergency radiologic consultation.

Authors:  Rachel J Toomey; John T Ryan; Mark F McEntee; Michael G Evanoff; Dev P Chakraborty; Jonathan P McNulty; David J Manning; Edel M Thomas; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Interobserver Variability of Radiographic Assessment Using a Mobile Messaging Application as a Teleconsultation Tool.

Authors:  Sezai Özkan; Jos J Mellema; David Ring; Neal C Chen
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-09

6.  Medical student case presentation performance and perception when using mobile learning technology in the emergency department.

Authors:  Matthew Tews; Kimberly Brennan; Tomer Begaz; Robert Treat
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2011-10-14

Review 7.  The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caroline Free; Gemma Phillips; Louise Watson; Leandro Galli; Lambert Felix; Phil Edwards; Vikram Patel; Andy Haines
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Utility of mobile devices in the computerized tomography evaluation of intracranial hemorrhage.

Authors:  Sridhar G Panughpath; Savith Kumar; Arjun Kalyanpur
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2013-01

9.  Radiology smartphone applications; current provision and cautions.

Authors:  M A Rodrigues; A Visvanathan; J T Murchison; R R Brady
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-08-04

Review 10.  Strengthening Delivery of Health Services Using Digital Devices.

Authors:  Maeghan Orton; Smisha Agarwal; Pierre Muhoza; Lavanya Vasudevan; Alexander Vu
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2018-10-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.