BACKGROUND: Background activity is often used as a reference to assess tumor treatment response on positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-D-glucose integrated with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). Our objective was to find the preferred background by assessing the repeatability of its activity. The activity was expressed by a standardized uptake value normalized to lean body mass (SUL). METHODS: Patients who received repeat 18F-FDG PET/CT scans within 1 to 4 days were selected. The indications included cancer screening, tumor staging, or treatment response evaluation. Background SULs from the aortic blood pool (ABP), liver, and muscle were recorded. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), the coefficient of variation (CV), and Bland-Altman plots for repeated measures were used to evaluate the degree of repeatability between the two scans. Intrapatient variation in SULs and factors, including the blood glucose level (BGL), tracer uptake period, and dose, were calculated as relative changes between the two scans. A linear regression model was used to analyze all relative changes to identify the correlation between factors and SULs. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included. The SUL ICCs for the ABP, liver, and muscle were 0.65 (95% CI, 0.38-0.81), 0.47 (95% CI, 0.15-0.70), and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.65-0.91), respectively. The SUL coefficients of variation (CVs) were 9% for the ABP, 12% for the liver, and 10% for muscle. Similar results were obtained from the Bland-Altman plots. There was a positive correlation between the variations in the liver SUL and the BGL (b=0.60, P<0.01). A similar result was found between the variations in muscle SUL and the BGL (b=0.45, P<0.01). The variation in muscle SUL showed a positive correlation with the variation in the tracer uptake period (b=0.58, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The SUL of the liver is more sensitive to BGLs and, therefore, may not be suitable as a referential background. Activities within the ABP and muscle are more stable than those of the liver and should be used as the preferred background for sequential patient evaluation. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Background activity is often used as a reference to assess tumor treatment response on positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-D-glucose integrated with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). Our objective was to find the preferred background by assessing the repeatability of its activity. The activity was expressed by a standardized uptake value normalized to lean body mass (SUL). METHODS: Patients who received repeat 18F-FDG PET/CT scans within 1 to 4 days were selected. The indications included cancer screening, tumor staging, or treatment response evaluation. Background SULs from the aortic blood pool (ABP), liver, and muscle were recorded. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), the coefficient of variation (CV), and Bland-Altman plots for repeated measures were used to evaluate the degree of repeatability between the two scans. Intrapatient variation in SULs and factors, including the blood glucose level (BGL), tracer uptake period, and dose, were calculated as relative changes between the two scans. A linear regression model was used to analyze all relative changes to identify the correlation between factors and SULs. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included. The SUL ICCs for the ABP, liver, and muscle were 0.65 (95% CI, 0.38-0.81), 0.47 (95% CI, 0.15-0.70), and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.65-0.91), respectively. The SUL coefficients of variation (CVs) were 9% for the ABP, 12% for the liver, and 10% for muscle. Similar results were obtained from the Bland-Altman plots. There was a positive correlation between the variations in the liver SUL and the BGL (b=0.60, P<0.01). A similar result was found between the variations in muscle SUL and the BGL (b=0.45, P<0.01). The variation in muscle SUL showed a positive correlation with the variation in the tracer uptake period (b=0.58, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The SUL of the liver is more sensitive to BGLs and, therefore, may not be suitable as a referential background. Activities within the ABP and muscle are more stable than those of the liver and should be used as the preferred background for sequential patient evaluation. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
18F-FDG PET/CT; Standardized uptake value normalized to lean body mass (SUL); background; intrapatient; repeatability
Authors: Agostino Chiaravalloti; Roberta Danieli; Paolo Abbatiello; Barbara Di Pietro; Laura Travascio; Maria Cantonetti; Manlio Guazzaroni; Antonio Orlacchio; Giovanni Simonetti; Orazio Schillaci Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-02-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Patricia Iozzo; Fabian Geisler; Vesa Oikonen; Maija Mäki; Teemu Takala; Olof Solin; Ele Ferrannini; Juhani Knuuti; Pirjo Nuutila Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Raef R Boktor; Gregory Walker; Roderick Stacey; Samuel Gledhill; Alexander G Pitman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: David Groheux; Marc Delord; Domenico Rubello; Patrick M Colletti; Minh-Loan Nguyen; Elif Hindié Journal: Clin Nucl Med Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 7.794
Authors: Michael C Kreissl; David B Stout; Koon-Pong Wong; Hsiao-Ming Wu; Evren Caglayan; Waldemar Ladno; Xiaoli Zhang; John O Prior; Christoph Reiners; Sung-Cheng Huang; Heinrich R Schelbert Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Gerben J C Zwezerijnen; Jakoba J Eertink; Maria C Ferrández; Sanne E Wiegers; Coreline N Burggraaff; Pieternella J Lugtenburg; Martijn W Heymans; Henrica C W de Vet; Josée M Zijlstra; Ronald Boellaard Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-09-27 Impact factor: 10.057