Literature DB >> 26682138

Peak flow velocities in the ascending aorta-real-time phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging vs. cine magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography.

Jan M Sohns1, Johannes T Kowallick1, Arun A Joseph1, K Dietmar Merboldt1, Dirk Voit1, Martin Fasshauer1, Wieland Staab1, Jens Frahm1, Joachim Lotz1, Christina Unterberg-Buchwald1.   

Abstract

This prospective study of eight healthy volunteers evaluates peak flow velocities (PFV) in the ascending aorta using real-time phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in comparison to cine phase-contrast MRI and echocardiography. Flow measurements by echocardiography and cine phase-contrast MRI with breath-holding were performed according to clinical standards. Real-time phase-contrast MRI at 40 ms temporal resolution and 1.3 mm in-plane resolution was based on highly undersampled radial fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequences with image reconstruction by regularized nonlinear inversion (NLINV). Evaluations focused on the determination of PFV. Linear regressions and Bland-Altman plots were used for comparisons of methods. When averaged across subjects, real-time phase-contrast MRI resulted in PFV of 120±20 cm s(-1) (mean ± SD) in comparison to 122±16 cm s(-1) for cine MRI and 124±20 cm s(-1) for echocardiography. The maximum deviations between real-time phase-contrast MRI and echocardiography ranged from -20 to +14 cm s(-1) (cine MRI: -10 to +12 cm s(-1)). Thus, in general, real-time phase-contrast MRI of cardiac outflow revealed quantitative agreement with cine MRI and echocardiography. The advantages of real-time MRI are measurements during free breathing and access to individual cardiac cycles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic flow; echocardiography; peak flow velocity (PFV); phase-contrast MRI; real-time MRI

Year:  2015        PMID: 26682138      PMCID: PMC4671970          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2015.08.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  22 in total

Review 1.  Real-time magnetic resonance imaging of cardiac function and flow-recent progress.

Authors:  Shuo Zhang; Arun A Joseph; Dirk Voit; Sebastian Schaetz; Klaus-Dietmar Merboldt; Christina Unterberg-Buchwald; Anja Hennemuth; Joachim Lotz; Jens Frahm
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-10

2.  Real-time MRI at a resolution of 20 ms.

Authors:  Martin Uecker; Shuo Zhang; Dirk Voit; Alexander Karaus; Klaus-Dietmar Merboldt; Jens Frahm
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Real-time blood flow imaging using autocalibrated spiral sensitivity encoding.

Authors:  Reza Nezafat; Peter Kellman; J Andrew Derbyshire; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  [Flow measurements in cardiac MRI].

Authors:  J Lotz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Real-time flow MRI of the aorta at a resolution of 40 msec.

Authors:  Arun Joseph; Johannes T Kowallick; Klaus-Dietmar Merboldt; Dirk Voit; Sebastian Schaetz; Shuo Zhang; Jan M Sohns; Joachim Lotz; Jens Frahm
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Flow quantification using fast cine phase-contrast MR imaging, conventional cine phase-contrast MR imaging, and Doppler sonography: in vitro and in vivo validation.

Authors:  V S Lee; C E Spritzer; B A Carroll; L G Pool; M A Bernstein; S K Heinle; J R MacFall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Echo-Doppler assessment of diastole: flow, function and haemodynamics.

Authors:  Thierry C Gillebert; Michel De Pauw; Frank Timmermans
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Flow volume and shunt quantification in pediatric congenital heart disease by real-time magnetic resonance velocity mapping: a validation study.

Authors:  Hermann Körperich; Jürgen Gieseke; Peter Barth; Romhild Hoogeveen; Hermann Esdorn; Andreas Peterschröder; Hans Meyer; Philipp Beerbaum
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-04-05       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 1.5 T using balanced SSFP and 40 ms resolution.

Authors:  Dirk Voit; Shuo Zhang; Christina Unterberg-Buchwald; Jan M Sohns; Joachim Lotz; Jens Frahm
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  1 in total

1.  Multivariable Technique for the Evaluation of the Trans-stenotic Pressure Gradient.

Authors:  Junghun Kim; Jongmin Lee; Jieun Park
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.305

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.