Nancy E Moran1, Janet A Novotny2, Morgan J Cichon3, Kenneth M Riedl4, Randy B Rogers5, Elizabeth M Grainger1, Steven J Schwartz4, John W Erdman5, Steven K Clinton6. 1. The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center. 2. Human Nutrition Research Center, USDA, Beltsville, MD; and. 3. Department of Food Science and Technology, and. 4. The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Food Science and Technology, and. 5. Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition and Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL. 6. The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, The James Cancer Hospital and Department of Internal Medicine-Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Steven.Clinton@osumc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phytoene is a tomato carotenoid that may contribute to the apparent health benefits of tomato consumption. Although phytoene is a less prominent tomato carotenoid than lycopene, it is a major carotenoid in various human tissues. Phytoene distribution to plasma lipoproteins and tissues differs from lycopene, suggesting the kinetics of phytoene and lycopene differ. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize the kinetic parameters of phytoene absorption, distribution, and excretion in adults, to better understand why biodistribution of phytoene differs from lycopene. METHODS: Four adults (2 males, 2 females) maintained a controlled phytoene diet (1-5 mg/d) for 42 d. On day 14, each consumed 3.2 mg (13)C-phytoene, produced using tomato cell suspension culture technology. Blood samples were collected at 0, 1-15, 17, 21, and 24 h and 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 14, 17, 21, and 28 d after (13)C-phytoene consumption. Plasma-unlabeled and plasma-labeled phytoene concentrations were determined using ultra-HPLC-quadrupole time-of-flight-mass spectrometry, and data were fit to a 7-compartment carotenoid kinetic model using WinSAAM 3.0.7 software. RESULTS: Subjects were compliant with a controlled phytoene diet, consuming a mean ± SE of 2.5 ± 0.6 mg/d, resulting in a plasma unlabeled phytoene concentration of 71 ± 14 nmol/L. A maximal plasma (13)C-phytoene concentration of 55.6 ± 5.9 nM was achieved 19.8 ± 9.2 h after consumption, and the plasma half-life was 2.3 ± 0.2 d. Compared with previous results for lycopene, phytoene bioavailability was nearly double at 58% ± 19%, the clearance rate from chylomicrons was slower, and the rates of deposition into and utilization by the slow turnover tissue compartment were nearly 3 times greater. CONCLUSIONS: Although only differing from lycopene by 4 double bonds, phytoene exhibits markedly different kinetic characteristics in human plasma, providing insight into metabolic processes contributing to phytoene enrichment in plasma and tissues compared with lycopene. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01692340.
BACKGROUND:Phytoene is a tomatocarotenoid that may contribute to the apparent health benefits of tomato consumption. Although phytoene is a less prominent tomatocarotenoid than lycopene, it is a major carotenoid in various human tissues. Phytoene distribution to plasma lipoproteins and tissues differs from lycopene, suggesting the kinetics of phytoene and lycopene differ. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize the kinetic parameters of phytoene absorption, distribution, and excretion in adults, to better understand why biodistribution of phytoene differs from lycopene. METHODS: Four adults (2 males, 2 females) maintained a controlled phytoene diet (1-5 mg/d) for 42 d. On day 14, each consumed 3.2 mg (13)C-phytoene, produced using tomato cell suspension culture technology. Blood samples were collected at 0, 1-15, 17, 21, and 24 h and 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 14, 17, 21, and 28 d after (13)C-phytoene consumption. Plasma-unlabeled and plasma-labeled phytoene concentrations were determined using ultra-HPLC-quadrupole time-of-flight-mass spectrometry, and data were fit to a 7-compartment carotenoid kinetic model using WinSAAM 3.0.7 software. RESULTS: Subjects were compliant with a controlled phytoene diet, consuming a mean ± SE of 2.5 ± 0.6 mg/d, resulting in a plasma unlabeled phytoene concentration of 71 ± 14 nmol/L. A maximal plasma (13)C-phytoene concentration of 55.6 ± 5.9 nM was achieved 19.8 ± 9.2 h after consumption, and the plasma half-life was 2.3 ± 0.2 d. Compared with previous results for lycopene, phytoene bioavailability was nearly double at 58% ± 19%, the clearance rate from chylomicrons was slower, and the rates of deposition into and utilization by the slow turnover tissue compartment were nearly 3 times greater. CONCLUSIONS: Although only differing from lycopene by 4 double bonds, phytoene exhibits markedly different kinetic characteristics in human plasma, providing insight into metabolic processes contributing to phytoene enrichment in plasma and tissues compared with lycopene. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01692340.
Authors: Anat Ben-Dor; Michael Steiner; Larisa Gheber; Michael Danilenko; Noga Dubi; Karin Linnewiel; Anat Zick; Yoav Sharoni; Joseph Levy Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Keren Hirsch; Andrea Atzmon; Michael Danilenko; Joseph Levy; Yoav Sharoni Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2006-10-19 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Nancy J Engelmann; Jessica K Campbell; Randy B Rogers; S Indumathie Rupassara; Peter J Garlick; Mary Ann Lila; John W Erdman Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: E Giovannucci; A Ascherio; E B Rimm; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; W C Willett Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1995-12-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: A Heather Eliassen; Sara J Hendrickson; Louise A Brinton; Julie E Buring; Hannia Campos; Qi Dai; Joanne F Dorgan; Adrian A Franke; Yu-tang Gao; Marc T Goodman; Göran Hallmans; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Judy Hoffman-Bolton; Kerstin Hultén; Howard D Sesso; Anne L Sowell; Rulla M Tamimi; Paolo Toniolo; Lynne R Wilkens; Anna Winkvist; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Wei Zheng; Susan E Hankinson Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Nancy E Moran; Jennifer M Thomas-Ahner; Jessica L Fleming; Joseph P McElroy; Rebecca Mehl; Elizabeth M Grainger; Ken M Riedl; Amanda E Toland; Steven J Schwartz; Steven K Clinton Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Besma Abbaoui; Christopher R Lucas; Ken M Riedl; Steven K Clinton; Amir Mortazavi Journal: Mol Nutr Food Res Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 5.914
Authors: Begoña Olmedilla-Alonso; Ana M Benítez-González; Rocío Estévez-Santiago; Paula Mapelli-Brahm; Carla M Stinco; Antonio J Meléndez-Martínez Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-12-11 Impact factor: 5.717