Vincent Mor1,2, Todd H Wagner3,4,5, Cari Levy6,7, Mary Ersek8,9, Susan C Miller2, Risha Gidwani-Marszowski3,4,10, Nina Joyce2, Katherine Faricy-Anderson1,11, Emily A Corneau1, Karl Lorenz4,5, Bruce Kinosian12, Scott Shreve13,14. 1. Center of Innovation in Long-term Services and Supports (LTSS COIN), Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island. 2. Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island. 3. Health Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California. 4. Center of Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California. 5. Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California. 6. Eastern Colorado VA Healthcare System, Denver. 7. University of Colorado, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Aurora. 8. Veteran Experience Center (formerly, the PROMISE Center), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 9. University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia. 10. Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 11. Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 12. Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 13. Hospice and Palliative Care Program, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. 14. Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Medicare hospice beneficiaries discontinue disease-modifying treatments because the hospice benefit limits access. While veterans have concurrent access to hospice care and Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center (VAMC)-provided treatments, the association of this with changes in treatment and costs of veterans' end-of-life care is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether increasing availability of hospice care, without restrictions on disease-modifying treatments, is associated with reduced aggressive treatments and medical care costs at the end of life. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A modified difference-in-differences study design, using facility fixed effects, compared patient outcomes during years with relatively high vs lower hospice use. This study evaluated 13 085 veterans newly diagnosed with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from 113 VAMCs with a minimum of 5 veterans diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC per year, between 2006 and 2012. Data analyses were conducted between January 2017 and July 2018. EXPOSURES: Using VA inpatient, outpatient, pharmacy claims, and similar Medicare data, we created VAMC-level annual aggregates of all patients who died of cancer for hospice use, cancer treatment, and/or concurrent receipt of both in the last month of life, dividing all VAMC years into quintiles of exposure to hospice availability. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Receipt of aggressive treatments (2 or more hospital admissions within 30 days, tube feeding, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit [ICU] admission) and total costs in the first 6 months after diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 13 085 veterans included in the study, 12 858 (98%) were men; 10 531 (81%) were white, and 5949 (46%) were older than 65 years. Veterans with NSCLC treated in a VAMC in the top hospice quintile (79% hospice users), relative to the bottom quintile (55% hospice users), were more than twice as likely to have concurrent cancer treatment after initiating hospice care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.28; 95% CI, 1.67-3.31). Nonetheless, for veterans with NSCLC seen in VAMCs in the top hospice quintile, the AOR of receiving aggressive treatment in the 6 months after diagnosis was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.53-0.81), and the AOR of ICU use was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.99) relative to patients seen in VAMCs in the bottom hospice quintile. The 6-month costs were lower by an estimated $266 (95% CI, -$358 to -$164) per day for the high-quintile group vs the low-quintile group. There was no survival difference. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Increasing the availability of hospice care without restricting treatment access for veterans with advanced lung cancer was associated with less aggressive medical treatment and significantly lower costs while still providing cancer treatment.
IMPORTANCE: Medicare hospice beneficiaries discontinue disease-modifying treatments because the hospice benefit limits access. While veterans have concurrent access to hospice care and Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center (VAMC)-provided treatments, the association of this with changes in treatment and costs of veterans' end-of-life care is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether increasing availability of hospice care, without restrictions on disease-modifying treatments, is associated with reduced aggressive treatments and medical care costs at the end of life. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A modified difference-in-differences study design, using facility fixed effects, compared patient outcomes during years with relatively high vs lower hospice use. This study evaluated 13 085 veterans newly diagnosed with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from 113 VAMCs with a minimum of 5 veterans diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC per year, between 2006 and 2012. Data analyses were conducted between January 2017 and July 2018. EXPOSURES: Using VA inpatient, outpatient, pharmacy claims, and similar Medicare data, we created VAMC-level annual aggregates of all patients who died of cancer for hospice use, cancer treatment, and/or concurrent receipt of both in the last month of life, dividing all VAMC years into quintiles of exposure to hospice availability. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Receipt of aggressive treatments (2 or more hospital admissions within 30 days, tube feeding, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit [ICU] admission) and total costs in the first 6 months after diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 13 085 veterans included in the study, 12 858 (98%) were men; 10 531 (81%) were white, and 5949 (46%) were older than 65 years. Veterans with NSCLC treated in a VAMC in the top hospice quintile (79% hospice users), relative to the bottom quintile (55% hospice users), were more than twice as likely to have concurrent cancer treatment after initiating hospice care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.28; 95% CI, 1.67-3.31). Nonetheless, for veterans with NSCLC seen in VAMCs in the top hospice quintile, the AOR of receiving aggressive treatment in the 6 months after diagnosis was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.53-0.81), and the AOR of ICU use was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.99) relative to patients seen in VAMCs in the bottom hospice quintile. The 6-month costs were lower by an estimated $266 (95% CI, -$358 to -$164) per day for the high-quintile group vs the low-quintile group. There was no survival difference. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Increasing the availability of hospice care without restricting treatment access for veterans with advanced lung cancer was associated with less aggressive medical treatment and significantly lower costs while still providing cancer treatment.
Authors: Craig C Earle; Elyse R Park; Bonnie Lai; Jane C Weeks; John Z Ayanian; Susan Block Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David J Casarett; Jessica M Fishman; Hien L Lu; Peter J O'Dwyer; Frances K Barg; Mary D Naylor; David A Asch Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Richard Brumley; Susan Enguidanos; Paula Jamison; Rae Seitz; Nora Morgenstern; Sherry Saito; Jan McIlwane; Kristine Hillary; Jorge Gonzalez Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ann M O'Hare; Catherine R Butler; Janelle S Taylor; Susan P Y Wong; Elizabeth K Vig; Ryan S Laundry; Melissa W Wachterman; Paul L Hebert; Chuan-Fen Liu; Nilka Rios-Burrows; Claire A Richards Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Carolyn J Presley; Ling Han; John R O'Leary; Weiwei Zhu; Emily Corneau; Herta Chao; Tracy Shamas; Michal Rose; Karl Lorenz; Cari R Levy; Vincent Mor; Cary P Gross Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Yufan Chen; Steven D Criss; Tina R Watson; Andrew Eckel; Lauren Palazzo; Angela C Tramontano; Ying Wang; Nathaniel D Mercaldo; Chung Yin Kong Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-09-09
Authors: Anand S Iyer; Christine A Goodrich; Mark T Dransfield; Shama S Alam; Cynthia J Brown; C Seth Landefeld; Marie A Bakitas; Jeremiah R Brown Journal: Am J Med Date: 2019-12-27 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Kim Mooney-Doyle; Jessica Keim-Malpass; Radion Svynarenko; Lisa C Lindley Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Shelli L Feder; Janet Tate; Mary Ersek; Supriya Krishnan; Sarwat I Chaudhry; Lori A Bastian; Joshua Rolnick; Ann Kutney-Lee; Kathleen M Akgün Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-09-12 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Lisa C Lindley; Radion Svynarenko; Kim Mooney-Doyle; Annette Mendola; Wendy C Naumann; Jessica Keim-Malpass Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 2.500