Cari Levy1,2, Mary Ersek3,4,5, Winifred Scott6, Joan G Carpenter3,4, Jennifer Kononowech7, Ciaran Phibbs6, Jill Lowry8, Jennifer Cohen8,9, Marybeth Foglia8,10. 1. Department of Veterans Affairs, Rocky Mountain VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA. Cari.Levy@va.gov. 2. Division of Health Care Policy and Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. Cari.Levy@va.gov. 3. Department of Veterans Affairs, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 5. Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 6. Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, CA, USA. 7. Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 8. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington, DC, USA. 9. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA. 10. Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: On July 1, 2018, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) National Center for Ethics in Health Care implemented the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI). Its goal is to identify, document, and honor LST decisions of seriously ill veterans. Providers document veterans' goals and decisions using a standardized LST template and order set. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the first 7 months of LSTDI implementation and identify predictors of LST template completion. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study of clinical and administrative data. We identified all completed LST templates, defined as completion of four required template fields. Templates also include four non-required fields. Results were stratified by risk of hospitalization or death as estimated by the Care Assessment Need (CAN) score. SUBJECTS: All veterans with VA utilization between July 1, 2018, and January 31, 2019. MAIN MEASURES: Completed LST templates, goals and LST preferences, and predictors of documentation. RESULTS: LST templates were documented for 108,145 veterans, and 85% had one or more of the non-required fields completed in addition to the required fields. Approximately half documented a preference for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Among those who documented specific goals, half wanted to improve or maintain function, independence, and quality of life while 28% had a goal of life prolongation irrespective of risk of hospitalization/death and 45% expressed a goal of comfort. Only 7% expressed a goal of being cured. Predictors of documentation included VA nursing home residence, older age, frailty, and comorbidity, while non-Caucasian race, rural residence, and receipt of care in a lower complexity medical center were predictive of no documentation. CONCLUSIONS: LST decisions were documented for veterans at high risk of hospitalization or death. While few expressed a preference for cure, half desire, cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Predictors of documentation were generally consistent with existing literature. Opportunities to reduce observed disparities exist by leveraging available VA resources and programs.
BACKGROUND: On July 1, 2018, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) National Center for Ethics in Health Care implemented the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI). Its goal is to identify, document, and honor LST decisions of seriously ill veterans. Providers document veterans' goals and decisions using a standardized LST template and order set. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the first 7 months of LSTDI implementation and identify predictors of LST template completion. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study of clinical and administrative data. We identified all completed LST templates, defined as completion of four required template fields. Templates also include four non-required fields. Results were stratified by risk of hospitalization or death as estimated by the Care Assessment Need (CAN) score. SUBJECTS: All veterans with VA utilization between July 1, 2018, and January 31, 2019. MAIN MEASURES: Completed LST templates, goals and LST preferences, and predictors of documentation. RESULTS: LST templates were documented for 108,145 veterans, and 85% had one or more of the non-required fields completed in addition to the required fields. Approximately half documented a preference for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Among those who documented specific goals, half wanted to improve or maintain function, independence, and quality of life while 28% had a goal of life prolongation irrespective of risk of hospitalization/death and 45% expressed a goal of comfort. Only 7% expressed a goal of being cured. Predictors of documentation included VA nursing home residence, older age, frailty, and comorbidity, while non-Caucasian race, rural residence, and receipt of care in a lower complexity medical center were predictive of no documentation. CONCLUSIONS: LST decisions were documented for veterans at high risk of hospitalization or death. While few expressed a preference for cure, half desire, cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Predictors of documentation were generally consistent with existing literature. Opportunities to reduce observed disparities exist by leveraging available VA resources and programs.
Authors: Li Wang; Brian Porter; Charles Maynard; Christopher Bryson; Haili Sun; Elliott Lowy; Mary McDonell; Kathleen Frisbee; Christopher Nielson; Stephan D Fihn Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-07-21 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Susan E Hickman; Bernard J Hammes; Alexia M Torke; Rebecca L Sudore; Greg A Sachs Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Shannon M Nugent; Christopher G Slatore; Linda Ganzini; Sara E Golden; Dana Zive; Kelly C Vranas; Donald R Sullivan Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Edwin S Wong; Jean Yoon; Rebecca I Piegari; Ann-Marie M Rosland; Stephan D Fihn; Evelyn T Chang Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Anne E Sales; Mary Ersek; Orna K Intrator; Cari Levy; Joan G Carpenter; Robert Hogikyan; Helen C Kales; Zach Landis-Lewis; Tobie Olsan; Susan C Miller; Marcos Montagnini; Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Sheri Reder Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Ann Kutney-Lee; Scarlett L Bellamy; Mary Ersek; Elina L Medvedeva; Dawn Smith; Joshua M Thorpe; J Margo Brooks Carthon Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Benjamin R Griffin; Neeru Agarwal; Rachana Amberker; Jeydith A Gutierrez Perez; Kelsi Eichorst; Jennifer Chapin; Amy C Schweitzer; Mariko Hagiwara; Chaorong Wu; Patrick Ten Eyck; Heather Schacht Reisinger; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin; Ethan F Kuperman; Kevin Glenn; Diana I Jalal Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2021-10 Impact factor: 2.899
Authors: Mary Ersek; Anne Sales; Shimrit Keddem; Roman Ayele; Leah M Haverhals; Kate H Magid; Jennifer Kononowech; Andrew Murray; Joan G Carpenter; Mary Beth Foglia; Lucinda Potter; Jennifer McKenzie; Darlene Davis; Cari Levy Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2022-07-20
Authors: Joan G Carpenter; Winifred Josephine Scott; Jennifer Kononowech; Mary Beth Foglia; Leah M Haverhals; Robert Hogikyan; Ann Kolanowski; Zach Landis-Lewis; Cari Levy; Susan C Miller; V J Periyakoil; Ciaran S Phibbs; Lucinda Potter; Anne Sales; Mary Ersek Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Carolyn T Thorpe; Florentina E Sileanu; Maria K Mor; Xinhua Zhao; Sherrie Aspinall; Mary Ersek; Sydney Springer; Joshua D Niznik; Michelle Vu; Loren J Schleiden; Walid F Gellad; Jacob Hunnicutt; Joshua M Thorpe; Joseph T Hanlon Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 5.562