Literature DB >> 26663511

Interstudy repeatability of self-gated quantitative myocardial perfusion MRI.

Devavrat Likhite1, Promporn Suksaranjit2, Ganesh Adluru1, Nan Hu3, Cindy Weng3, Eugene Kholmovski1, Chris McGann2, Brent Wilson2, Edward DiBella1,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the interstudy repeatability of multislice quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), and extracellular volume (ECV). A unique saturation recovery self-gated acquisition was used for the perfusion scans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ungated golden angle radial turboFLASH pulse sequence was used to scan 10 subjects on two separate days on a 3T scanner. A single saturation pulse was followed by a set of four slices. Rest and hyperemia scans were acquired during free breathing. The images were reconstructed using an iterative algorithm with spatiotemporal constraints. The ungated images were retrospectively binned (self-gated) into near-systole and near-diastole. Deformable registration was performed to adjust for respiratory and residual cardiac motion, and the data were fit with a Fermi model to estimate the interstudy repeatability of quantitative self-gated MBF and MPR.
RESULTS: The coefficient of variation (CoV) of the territorial MPR using the self-gated near-systole data was 18.6%. The self-gated near-diastole data gave less good CoV of MPR, equal to 46.2%. For MBFs, and using smaller (segmental) regions, the CoVs were 20.1% and 22.7% for the estimation of myocardial blood flow at stress and rest, respectively, using the self-gated near-systole data. The self-gated near-diastole data gave CoV = 48.6% and 44.9% for stress and rest.
CONCLUSION: The self-gated free-breathing technique for quantification of myocardial blood flow showed good repeatability for near-systole, with results comparable to published studies on interstudy repeatability of quantitative myocardial perfusion MRI using ECG-gating and breath-holds. Self-gated near-diastole data results were less repeatable. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:1369-1378.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECG-gating; MRI myocardial perfusion; interstudy repeatability; quantitative perfusion; self-gated

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26663511      PMCID: PMC4865416          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  39 in total

1.  Estimates of systolic and diastolic myocardial blood flow by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Aleksandra Radjenovic; John D Biglands; Abdulghani Larghat; John P Ridgway; Stephen G Ball; John P Greenwood; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Sven Plein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Endocardial and epicardial myocardial perfusion determined by semi-quantitative and quantitative myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Abdulghani Larghat; John Biglands; Neil Maredia; John P Greenwood; Stephen G Ball; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Sven Plein
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging: inter-study reproducibility.

Authors:  Geraint Morton; Roy Jogiya; Sven Plein; Andreas Schuster; Amedeo Chiribiri; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Myocardial perfusion imaging with first-pass computed tomographic imaging: Measurement of coronary flow reserve in an animal model of regional hyperemia.

Authors:  Timothy F Christian; Mei Lee Frankish; Jennifer H Sisemoore; Madeline R Christian; George Gentchos; Stephen P Bell; Michael Jerosch-Herold
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  A general dual-bolus approach for quantitative DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Lucy E Kershaw; Hai-Ling Margaret Cheng
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Evaluation of the effect of myocardial segmentation errors on myocardial blood flow estimates from DCE-MRI.

Authors:  J Biglands; D Magee; R Boyle; A Larghat; S Plein; A Radjenović
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT.

Authors:  Kheng-Thye Ho; Kia-Chong Chua; Ernst Klotz; Christoph Panknin
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-08

Review 8.  Quantification of myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Michael Jerosch-Herold
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Acquisition and reconstruction of undersampled radial data for myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ganesh Adluru; Chris McGann; Peter Speier; Eugene G Kholmovski; Akram Shaaban; Edward V R Dibella
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance throughout the cardiac cycle.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Ananth Kidambi; Akhlaque Uddin; Steven Sourbron; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  8 in total

1.  Whole-heart, ungated, free-breathing, cardiac-phase-resolved myocardial perfusion MRI by using Continuous Radial Interleaved simultaneous Multi-slice acquisitions at sPoiled steady-state (CRIMP).

Authors:  Ye Tian; Jason Mendes; Brent Wilson; Alexander Ross; Ravi Ranjan; Edward DiBella; Ganesh Adluru
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Estimating extraction fraction and blood flow by combining first-pass myocardial perfusion and T1 mapping results.

Authors:  Devavrat Likhite; Promporn Suksaranjit; Ganesh Adluru; Brent Wilson; Edward DiBella
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-10

3.  The reliability and feasibility of non-contrast adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 mapping in patients on haemodialysis.

Authors:  Federica E Poli; Gaurav S Gulsin; Daniel S March; Ahmed Msek Abdelaty; Kelly S Parke; Joanne V Wormleighton; Gerry P McCann; James O Burton; Matthew Pm Graham-Brown
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Magnetic resonance multitasking for motion-resolved quantitative cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Anthony G Christodoulou; Jaime L Shaw; Christopher Nguyen; Qi Yang; Yibin Xie; Nan Wang; Debiao Li
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 25.671

5.  Fully automated, inline quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: repeatability of measurements in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Louise A E Brown; Sebastian C Onciul; David A Broadbent; Kerryanne Johnson; Graham J Fent; James R J Foley; Pankaj Garg; Pei G Chew; Kristopher Knott; Erica Dall'Armellina; Peter P Swoboda; Hui Xue; John P Greenwood; James C Moon; Peter Kellman; Sven Plein
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Feasibility of multiple-view myocardial perfusion MRI using radial simultaneous multi-slice acquisitions.

Authors:  Ye Tian; Jason Mendes; Apoorva Pedgaonkar; Mark Ibrahim; Leif Jensen; Joyce D Schroeder; Brent Wilson; Edward V R DiBella; Ganesh Adluru
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Compact MR-compatible ergometer and its application in cardiac MR under exercise stress: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Bo He; Yushu Chen; Lei Wang; Yang Yang; Chunchao Xia; Jie Zheng; Fabao Gao
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.737

8.  Evaluation of quantitative CMR perfusion imaging by comparison with simultaneous 15O-water-PET.

Authors:  Håkan Ahlström; Mark Lubberink; Tanja Kero; Edvin Johansson; Mathias Engström; Kai M Eggers; Lars Johansson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 5.952

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.