Devavrat Likhite1, Promporn Suksaranjit2, Ganesh Adluru1, Nan Hu3, Cindy Weng3, Eugene Kholmovski1, Chris McGann2, Brent Wilson2, Edward DiBella1,4. 1. Utah Center for Advanced Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 2. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 4. Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the interstudy repeatability of multislice quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), and extracellular volume (ECV). A unique saturation recovery self-gated acquisition was used for the perfusion scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ungated golden angle radial turboFLASH pulse sequence was used to scan 10 subjects on two separate days on a 3T scanner. A single saturation pulse was followed by a set of four slices. Rest and hyperemia scans were acquired during free breathing. The images were reconstructed using an iterative algorithm with spatiotemporal constraints. The ungated images were retrospectively binned (self-gated) into near-systole and near-diastole. Deformable registration was performed to adjust for respiratory and residual cardiac motion, and the data were fit with a Fermi model to estimate the interstudy repeatability of quantitative self-gated MBF and MPR. RESULTS: The coefficient of variation (CoV) of the territorial MPR using the self-gated near-systole data was 18.6%. The self-gated near-diastole data gave less good CoV of MPR, equal to 46.2%. For MBFs, and using smaller (segmental) regions, the CoVs were 20.1% and 22.7% for the estimation of myocardial blood flow at stress and rest, respectively, using the self-gated near-systole data. The self-gated near-diastole data gave CoV = 48.6% and 44.9% for stress and rest. CONCLUSION: The self-gated free-breathing technique for quantification of myocardial blood flow showed good repeatability for near-systole, with results comparable to published studies on interstudy repeatability of quantitative myocardial perfusion MRI using ECG-gating and breath-holds. Self-gated near-diastole data results were less repeatable. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:1369-1378.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the interstudy repeatability of multislice quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), and extracellular volume (ECV). A unique saturation recovery self-gated acquisition was used for the perfusion scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ungated golden angle radial turboFLASH pulse sequence was used to scan 10 subjects on two separate days on a 3T scanner. A single saturation pulse was followed by a set of four slices. Rest and hyperemia scans were acquired during free breathing. The images were reconstructed using an iterative algorithm with spatiotemporal constraints. The ungated images were retrospectively binned (self-gated) into near-systole and near-diastole. Deformable registration was performed to adjust for respiratory and residual cardiac motion, and the data were fit with a Fermi model to estimate the interstudy repeatability of quantitative self-gated MBF and MPR. RESULTS: The coefficient of variation (CoV) of the territorial MPR using the self-gated near-systole data was 18.6%. The self-gated near-diastole data gave less good CoV of MPR, equal to 46.2%. For MBFs, and using smaller (segmental) regions, the CoVs were 20.1% and 22.7% for the estimation of myocardial blood flow at stress and rest, respectively, using the self-gated near-systole data. The self-gated near-diastole data gave CoV = 48.6% and 44.9% for stress and rest. CONCLUSION: The self-gated free-breathing technique for quantification of myocardial blood flow showed good repeatability for near-systole, with results comparable to published studies on interstudy repeatability of quantitative myocardial perfusion MRI using ECG-gating and breath-holds. Self-gated near-diastole data results were less repeatable. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:1369-1378.
Authors: Aleksandra Radjenovic; John D Biglands; Abdulghani Larghat; John P Ridgway; Stephen G Ball; John P Greenwood; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Sven Plein Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Abdulghani Larghat; John Biglands; Neil Maredia; John P Greenwood; Stephen G Ball; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Sven Plein Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Timothy F Christian; Mei Lee Frankish; Jennifer H Sisemoore; Madeline R Christian; George Gentchos; Stephen P Bell; Michael Jerosch-Herold Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2010-05-15 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Ganesh Adluru; Chris McGann; Peter Speier; Eugene G Kholmovski; Akram Shaaban; Edward V R Dibella Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ye Tian; Jason Mendes; Brent Wilson; Alexander Ross; Ravi Ranjan; Edward DiBella; Ganesh Adluru Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Federica E Poli; Gaurav S Gulsin; Daniel S March; Ahmed Msek Abdelaty; Kelly S Parke; Joanne V Wormleighton; Gerry P McCann; James O Burton; Matthew Pm Graham-Brown Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Anthony G Christodoulou; Jaime L Shaw; Christopher Nguyen; Qi Yang; Yibin Xie; Nan Wang; Debiao Li Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2018-04-09 Impact factor: 25.671
Authors: Louise A E Brown; Sebastian C Onciul; David A Broadbent; Kerryanne Johnson; Graham J Fent; James R J Foley; Pankaj Garg; Pei G Chew; Kristopher Knott; Erica Dall'Armellina; Peter P Swoboda; Hui Xue; John P Greenwood; James C Moon; Peter Kellman; Sven Plein Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Ye Tian; Jason Mendes; Apoorva Pedgaonkar; Mark Ibrahim; Leif Jensen; Joyce D Schroeder; Brent Wilson; Edward V R DiBella; Ganesh Adluru Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Håkan Ahlström; Mark Lubberink; Tanja Kero; Edvin Johansson; Mathias Engström; Kai M Eggers; Lars Johansson Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 5.952